• 1886 Broadway

    1886 Broadway

    Posted by

    on

    Lily Chen – Baruch

    Though this public space does have a large sign it is kind of hidden away. As you walk past Lincoln Plaza Cinemas there are four pillars and the sign is on the fourth pillar. If someone did not walk in further enough they could easily miss the sign. From the outside I also didn’t think this was a space I could enter in because it felt very tucked away in the back.

    Going further inside to the space, there are a couple benches and two trash cans. There wasn’t anyone around besides a family that was passing through with their children to go into a building nearby. I feel that this space would be more useful in the summer since it is so cold out nobody really wants to sit outside.

    As for the nature setting at this public space the front bushes were at a good height to indicate as a gate to not enter inside the grass but also low enough so that you can see the trees and larger bushes up top inside the garden. I would say this space is not bad but I am more of an indoor person so I prefer the Atrium public space more than this one.

    During our walk we also talked about hostile architecture which contradicts to the phrase “public space.” Though this area is public it is clear that there is an unnecessary bar at the center of the benches to maybe prevent homeless people from sleeping on it.

    See this post on its own page: 1886 Broadway
  • David Rubenstein Atrium

    Posted by

    on

    I would rate this public space 5 stars out of 5. This space greets you with a large sign in the front, clarifying that it is open to all and has a variety of amenities. When entering the space, I am immediately pleased by the visuals which include high ceilings, a plant wall, tons of seating, a water feature, and more. The space is very clean and although it was empty, it was comforting to see all the free space that I was welcome to use. Also, the space had clean and easily accessible bathrooms, with signs that also had braille for visually impaired people. There were also multiple signs that remind the public of surveillance cameras to maintain safety. Overall, I felt safe and would like to visit again as it was very clean, safe, accessible, and visually appealing.  -Sara Abdulla (Lehman College)

    See this post on its own page: David Rubenstein Atrium
  • David Rubenstein Atrium

    David Rubenstein Atrium

    Posted by

    on

    Mariah I. Massari from Queens College

    • Has a big sign that says it’s a open public space and specifies what is inside (like how many tables, chairs, etc.)
    • It’s very nice and quiet, not much people here
    • They have a nice plant wall (with real plants) and cool water fountain.
    • They have a video screen that displays videos
    • They have an elevator and a restroom 
    • There is security and cameras here, so I do feel safe
    • There are water fountains 
    • It’s inside and you can take shelter if there is bad weather outside 
    • I was able to use the bathroom (even though you’re supposed to use a key to enter)
    • The bathroom toilet had a way to save water based on the way you flushed (environmental friendly). They also have an emergency handle you can pull just in case anything happens while you’re in the bathroom.
    • I definitely can see myself hanging out here, eating lunch, or studying.

    Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    See this post on its own page: David Rubenstein Atrium
  • David Rubenstein Atrium

    Posted by

    on

    Rating: 4.5/5

    Overall, this POP seemed to be very accessible where it was even wheelchair accessible. From the images provided, you can tell that it has a very open and inviting. It had a public restroom, heating, and seating. There was music playing and friendly staff which adds to the welcoming ambiance. The only thing that is stopping this POP from getting a 5/5 is that it seems to be a bit hidden from the public eye. As a pedestrian walking the streets of NYC, I wouldn’t really have noticed this beautiful location. Not many people stop to read what are placed outside the walls of buildings and for the sign to be towards the opposite direction if people walk, it seems purposely placed there.

    Kristen Sosa, Queens College

    See this post on its own page: David Rubenstein Atrium
  • David Rubenstein Atrium

    David Rubenstein Atrium

    Posted by

    on

    Rating: 4.5 / 5 stars

    First impression was the space was that it is well designed with high ceilings and plenty of moving space. The starking contrast of the green wall against the relatively muted palette allows the wall to provide its due job of engaging the viewer. The space is wide with plenty of facilities, including but not limited to, a cafe (only open on Tuesdays and Saturdays), moveable tables and chairs, green wall, water decor, water fountain (on a more cramped second floor), restroom (on the second floor but is accessible), video screening, etc. I observed a game of chess being played, proving the comfortability of this POPS. On another side was a couple having a presumable date. There were signs everywhere that declared the space was public, I personally counted more than 4. I liked how the signs made it clear what was inside the facility, including a free show once a week (which we did not have the opportunity to see). My critiques are as follows, the entrance accessible door is partly broken which defeats the purpose of the accessibility button, the space leading into the bathroom is very cramped (but it seems to be gender neutral which is nice), and finally, the cafe is opened at very limited times (this is biased cause I was hungry).

    Review and pictures by Selina Zheng (Macaulay Hunter College ’27)

    See this post on its own page: David Rubenstein Atrium
  • David Rubenstein Atrium 61West 62nd Street

    David Rubenstein Atrium 61West 62nd Street

    Posted by

    on

    Lily Chen

    Starting at the entrance of the building there is a large metal sign that makes it very obvious that this area is a public space. There is also a button for disabled people to be able to easily enter into the building, however, the automatic doors only work for the second door inside not the door outside. Maintenance is needed to ensure that those in wheelchairs can be able to access this space.

    The second sign that I noticed was that this building is LEED certified which means that they would be environment friendly and cost saving. This is obvious as you walk in and look up into the ceiling, there are holes in the ceiling allowing natural light to come in. Overall, the setting is ambient, calm, and dim it is more reliant on the sunshine that is coming through to give in more light. However, I feel that the light is just right.

    I feel that the overall setting is welcoming and I would come visit again if I was around this area. There are a lot of empty tables and chairs for sitting and many people are here doing work or eating lunch. What I was interested in is how they built their green wall. Over the summer I was also trying to build a green wall myself at Socrates Sculpture park however my project was mainly on finishing a green roof so I did not get to finish my side project of a green wall. I wonder how the plants were set up and how the dirt is set into place.

    See this post on its own page: David Rubenstein Atrium 61West 62nd Street
  • Interview with Avi

    Posted by

    on

    Throughout the course of this interview with Avi, I learned exactly how he created his audio clip. Avi explored, going through and Arc’teryx and a Kiehl’s, before finally wandering outside. Meanwhile, he recorded the entire trip and then took the most interesting parts from that longer recording. As I was asking my questions, I realized how my own opinions had impacted the questions I thought to ask. When I had created my own recording, I had deliberately searched for an interesting sound to try to record, and I found that the questions I had written reflected this. It was eye-opening to see how differently we thought about the same tasks.

    You can read my partner’s post here.

    See this post on its own page: Interview with Avi
  • My interview with Emily

    Posted by

    on

    ”New Yorkers always have somewhere to be.” – Emily

    Questions asked during the interview:

    Where was your sound recording taken?

    • Emily has said that her recording was taken around the streets of the Macaulay Building.

    What made you choose this sound?

    • Emily said that she chose to do a recording on the sounds made on the streets of NYC because New Yorkers always have somewhere to be so there would constantly be noises on the streets of NYC.

    If you can choose to make a recording on a different sound, what would it be?

    • Emily said that she would go into a cafe and record the background music because it is normally calming to listen to.
    See this post on its own page: My interview with Emily
  • My Interview with Dalia

    Posted by

    on

    Dalia recorded a group of Macaulay students playing certain instruments in the cabaret room. She thought the sound was unique compared to anything else.

    It was the first and last sound that I heard in the Macaulay Building.

    We hear music all around the city.

    See this post on its own page: My Interview with Dalia
  • Interview

    Posted by

    on

    My approach to recording the sounds of the city consisted of immediately recording my whole venture and visiting various stores to capture both the outdoors and indoors of the city. I then trimmed the recording down to the places I’ve gone to (the outside, Arc’teryx, and Kiehl’s).

    As I interviewed Steven about his journey, I assumed he approached the assignment in the way I did, but soon discovered that I was wrong. Rather than recording his whole journey, he wandered around the area with no set destination and attempted to capture a nice sound like “birds,” the “sweeping” of a broom, and “traffic.”

    Though we approached the task very differently, our recordings still resulted in what we believe to be the essence of the city–mine on consumerism and his on serenity.

    See this post on its own page: Interview
  • My Interview with Dasani

    Posted by

    on

    We recorded our audio clips in Central Park, but we managed to capture different aspects of it.

    As we were walking through the park, we noticed the difference between the atmospheres of Manhattan and the Bronx. Dasani managed to capture the sound of birds chirping in a bush, leading me to ask about whether she had heard similar sounds in her neighborhood. In part of her response she said,

    The Bronx seems to be quite dead. I wish that there were more nature-centered places, and I kind of wish we had some like Manhattan.

    This statement captured my attention as I also noticed the differences between the nature sounds in Manhattan and in the Bronx. At Lehman I manage to see glimpses of nature like a seagull or a falcon, but I rarely see them around where I live.

    On our way to the park, however, we stumbled upon a deeper issue. I had mentioned that I overheard a conversation between locals who were discussing which country they should go to for vacation. We had found this exchange amusing because, as residents of less wealthy neighborhoods, we rarely talk about going on vacation, much less a vacation to a different country. Dasani summarized our thoughts in the following statement:

    I feel like there’s a lot of wealthy people here. By their mannerisms you can tell there’s a class divide.

    Hearing Dasani’s thoughts about her feelings of alienation were really insightful, and it is interesting that a walk in a park led to this discussion.

    See this post on its own page: My Interview with Dasani
  • Interview with Diana

    Posted by

    on

    While the climate in New York City has distinct changes throughout the year, for some people, like myself, the city itself significantly changes with the seasons. But for people like my interviewee, Diana, the city does not change throughout the seasons. For her, there is so much going on all the time and opportunities offered in every season, people are always caught in a never-ending cycle of activities. Diana believes that because of the amount of activities, one can immerse oneself in and allow them to reconnect with their surroundings and community. 

    Regardless of the temperature, rain, snow, or sun, the city is always moving at the same pace through her eyes and it keeps everything flowing. She does notice a change of dynamic in the number of people, however. In Rockaway, her neighborhood, for example, Diana notices a distinct change in the amount of people. In the summer, the beaches fill up with people, but as the temperature gets colder, human movement in the area decreases. But Diana pointed out something crucial; the residents of Rockaway are always there. She claims that people who live there step away from the beach in the summer, and start going back routinely as the waves of people die down. So the movement of the city overall is always the same, perhaps the hotspots just change and rotate. But the city itself is always in movement. 

    See this post on its own page: Interview with Diana
  • Interview with Ashley

    Posted by

    on

    This is the recording.

    What made you walk into the place you were in?

    “I really like Starbucks and I walked in earlier in the morning and the cashier was really nice. I also go there often.

    What about your environment was comfortable or uncomfortable?

    “It was really welcoming, I wasn’t uncomfortable at all.”

    Would you recommend Starbucks to a tourist? What about Manhattan?

    “Yes, Starbucks is a good place to be in and the city is really pretty.”
    See this post on its own page: Interview with Ashley
  • Sound Interview: Amna

    Posted by

    on

    Amna’s audio in Central Park

    The audio makes Amna feel the vastness of the city. She says it makes her think of the people of New York. For her, she likes that the people of New York mind their business, but she notes that once you get into a conversation with one– good luck!

    Even though the people may have their ups and downs, Amna really loves the visual aspect of New York, something an audio doesn’t capture. She’s a big fan of the buildings here and thinks the architecture is really gorgeous. She mentions that the cultural diversity really adds to the sounds of New York.

    Though the architecture enchants her, she doesn’t always come to the city because the public transportation is a real hassle. She dislikes how crowded it gets, and the sheer volume of people that are always in the subway, specifically.

    Overall, Amna would still recommend people come to New York because it is a good experience, and you get to meet a lot of people different from you.

    See this post on its own page: Sound Interview: Amna
  • My Interview with Marisa

    Posted by

    on

    Marisa’s video in Central Park

    Marisa took this video in Central park. One of the questions I asked her was what she likes about this particular park? She responded by saying that she like nature, animals, birds in the Central Park. It’s also a great sight for people watch. You see a lot of cultural diversity and tourists. It’s also very beautiful, peaceful and quiet. Marisa also mentioned that she comes here once or twice a month .

    Marisa thinks that Central Park is unique as an individual gets to experience and see things that they might not see in other parts or NYC, for example, Horse carriages. You don’t see many horse carriages in NYC but you see it here. Its also a place for runners where they can practice for marathons. It’s a great place for bird watch.

    See this post on its own page: My Interview with Marisa