All posts by Makeba

Just a small teen with some really big dreams

My (Embarrassing) Foot Prints

Official Foot Print Graph

Discussion Questions:

1. Compared to my original foot print calculation of requiring 5.7 planets to provide enough resources for everyone to live the way I live, the country’s average is only 5.0 planets

2. The biggest, easiest and more sensical change I could make would be to cut back on all of the meat I consume on a weekly basis. I eat meat around 4-5 times a week. If I cut back on my meat consumption, my foot print would decrease by more tan an entire planet. It would also save me huge amounts of money.

3. Overall as a society and as a world, we just need to think more in regards to all of the resources we consume. There are some huge changes we can make, such as switching to a car with more miles per gallon, but there are also the simple and easy changes we can make, like consuming less meats or consuming local meats and foods. Even if we don’t make changes right away, if we just take the time to consider the changes we could make and how greatly it could impact and better our world, that alone would be a step in the right direction. Awareness is the first step.

Hall of Biodiversity at the American Museum of Natural History

The Wall of different Species of Animals

IMG_0556

The purpose of the wall of different species is to inform its views of the different species found in the Animalia kingdom, including, but not limited to arthropods, mollusks , and echinoderms. Through videos, diagrams and mounted models, the wall informs its viewers of the trademark characteristics of various species, in addition to how they interact with their environment.

This was a very popular display in the Biodiversity Hall. During a 15 minute observation, roughly 37 people came and left this wall. Most of the visitors were young children who vigorously touched the video screens and pointed at the various models on the wall crying out excitedly to their parents as they watched.

As far as the information and its accessibility goes, I feel as if this wall pretty much nailed it. The information was clear, colorful and easy to read and comprehend. The information was also accessible either through text if you felt like reading, or video if you didn’t want to.

The Endangered Species Case

IMG_0557

The case of Endangered Species is meant to show its audience some of the many animals that are threatened, endangered and facing imminent extinction.

This was also a fairly popular case, but not to the extent of the Wall of Different Species. During a 15 minutes observation at this display, roughly 26 people came and left. Once again, the majority of the viewers were children, and although there were no videos or touch screens at this display, the children seemed even more excited than at the Wall of Different Species. They pressed their hands and faces against the glass trying to get as close as humanly possible to the stuffed models in the case and waved their parents over to come and see what they were seeing.

Though its visuals may have potentially outshine those of the Wall of Different Species, the Endangered Species case’s information was not as extensive and in depth as the Wall’s. There was only one information box for the whole case and although its information was great, it felt awkwardly placed on the case, and unless you really searched for it, you just might miss it. That small note aside, it was an incredible display.

I wish I could better answer the question of whether or not the Biodiversity exhibit could have better conveyed the biodiversity and conservation message. The truth is, I knew so, so little about both topics prior to taking this class, that I feel as if I cannot confidently give any criticism to how accurately the topics were portrayed. I thought it was all wonderful and very well executed and extremely informative. I don’t really have any suggestions on how it could have been improved. Maybe a bit more lighting in some areas to take it easier to read the information boxes, but that’s about it.

Overall the Hall of Biodiversity did a fantastic job of introducing the public to and educating them on such an important topic. It can be difficult to take in conservation and biodiversity issues and topics when you hear about them on the news or in the nature magazines with all of the expert opinions and scientific words, but the exhibit at the Museum of Natural History informs without, overwhelming, which is the approached the average person responds best to. Great exhibit!

Is This Science? “Endangered Species: The de-extinction Controversy”

2

I’m sure most of you guys had a clear idea of an issue you wanted to further explore when Professor C first gave us the assignment to find an article on a controversial environmental topic, but in my case, I wound up choosing and article on an issue I didn’t even know was and issue, so I definitely learned something new.

I found an article on The Weather Network website (its actually a pretty awesome website just for exploring alone) about the “de-extinction” of endangered species which, again, I wasn’t even aware was a thing. I soon found out however, it most certainly is a thing.

Following the flow chart, I gathered that the author’s unspoken beliefs/feelings do not necessarily support the idea of ‘de-extincting’ animals. All of the evidence she provided throughout the article seemed to be of the failed attempts to ‘de-extinct’ animals, and of the attempts that were a success, she made sure to highlight all the defects and unfortunate events following the successful attempt.

Some scientists/experts on the other hand, are all for the bringing back of extinct animals. Some believe they “have an obligation to try and do this”, especially if we (humans) are the reasons the animals are extinct to begin with. Others argue that the resources invested in trying to bring back animals that are no longer living should be redirected to the animals that are living (I happen to agree).

If these animals are brought back, many feel the many threats the eliminated the species in the first place, like climate change and human interference, still exist today. (This is clearly true) If these animals are brought back, the chances of them becoming extinct again are tremendous.

I could be wrong, but it seems this author of this article is trying to emphasize the dangers and the sheer uncertainty about sure a serious scientific interest. If that was her intent, she won me over. I went from not knowing people were trying to bring back extinct animals, to actually hoping people song bring back extinct animals. It’s hard to explain, but just thinking about it makes me feel weird.

There’s the link if you want to read it for yourselves

http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/endangered-species-the-de-extinction-controversy/10338/

And as far as the initial question: Is this science? I definitely think it is.

Mini-BioBlitz 2014 : Lily Pond

1Unfortunately I was unable to make it to the BioBlitz with the rest of the Macaulay gang, but I was able to do a sort of “Mini-BioBlitz” on my own at the Lily Pond located on our very own Brooklyn College campus. During  my time at the Lily Pond,  I observed the various plants (as well as a turtle!) that were there. I am not very good at identifying various types of plants, but I did take pictures and record some notes regarding the appearance of each plant. My findings were as followed:

IMG_9508

As shown above, I came across a short sort of leafy bush with spear-shaped leaves that were dark green in color with some white along the edges. I have no idea what this plant is called (for the purposes of this reflection I will call it Plant #1), but it smelled kind of nice!

IMG_9509

Next to Plant #1, there was another squat leafy bush (Plant #2). This one was significantly smaller in size compared to the other plant, but it had roughly the same shaped leaves, but these leaves lacked the white colored edging the others had. The veins in Plant #2 were also more prominent thank that of Plant #1 (or at least they appeared to be). Again, I have no idea what the scientific name of this plant is.

IMG_9510

The plant shown above (Plant #3) posses significantly differing characteristics than that of the previous two. This plant’s leaves had more of a jagged edge and unlike the other two, this plant had some lavender flowering on it. The flowers faintly resemble bells when closed, but when opened, they look like most flower petals. I forgot to smell this plant, and I’m annoyed I didn’t. It seems like it might smell nice.

IMG_9512

My favorite part of the Lily Pond is the mass assortment of colorful flower bushes and plants they have encircled within a small wall of hedges.  The wall and some sort of sundial statue keep you from entering the circle and getting an up and personal look at the flowers (and maybe thats why they’re all still so pretty) but even from a distance you can easily make out all the beautiful reds and pinks and organs. I wish I knew what these were called so I could plant some at home!

That’s about it. I didn’t have as thrilling of a BioBlitz as I’m sure the rest of Macaulay did, but I can’t say I’m unhappy with my Mini-BioBlitz. I was able to see some beautiful plants, some cute turtles, and escape from the sheer “urbanness” of Brooklyn for a little bit.  All in all, a successful visit.