New York TV

Though a philandering womanizer, an architect searching for love, a hockey loving late night news anchor, and a married couple of an offbeat kindergarten teacher and a corporate lawyer doesn’t sound like a community, “How I Met Your Mother” preserves much of New York culture. Non-New Yorkers may not understand the characters’ references to specific parts of the Museum of Natural History, their disdain for New Jersey, their passionate debate over how to best get across Manhattan, or why seeing a celebrity isn’t a big deal, but these are all recognizable traits and conversations to the residents of New York city.  New York city culture is a clear influence on the show, and the show wouldn’t be as funny without it.

One particular episode which stands out in my mind as preserving New York culture is “Subway Wars”.  In this episode, the group of friends the show focuses on- Barney, Ted, Robin, Lilly, and Marshall- races from McClaren’s, their usual hangout, to a restaurant downtown.  Robin chooses to take a cab, Lilly the subway, Ted the bus, Marshall chooses to run, and Barney feigns illness in order to be taken downtown in an ambulance. This debate is familiar to New Yorkers, and is somewhat unique to New York because very few other cities have so many options. Though choosing- or not choosing- a cab often has more to do with money and comfort than efficiency, I’m sure almost all New Yorkers have argued about what is the best way to get around town.  With my friends we may argue bus vs. train or about which bus or train.  Others may want to forgo public transportation and just walk, “Why bother taking the train five (or three, or six) blocks?” is often asked. People usually come to a consensus rather than racing, but each individual tends to still think the way he or she first suggested is the best.

Though they each are met with unusual complications along their journey, much of the travel experience is recognizable to a New Yorker.  Lilly’s experiences were the most relatable to mine.  Lilly just misses a train, and after catching the next one learns that it is running on a different line than usual- both of which are experiences most New Yorkers have had.

In this episode the characters also discuss what it means to be a “real New Yorker”.  Robin, being from Canada, is excited about the prospect of seeing Woody Allen.  Her friends are unimpressed because they’ve seen him before, he is a common figure in New York.  Robin, in an attempt to sound as hip as her friends, brags about seeing Maury Povich, but they have all seen Maury multiple times.  This leads to the challenge of Robin’s status as a “real New Yorker”. The rest of the group decides that being a real New Yorker entails stealing someone’s cab ride, crying on the subway and not caring who hears, and killing a cockroach with your bare hands.  Though none of these things sound particularly appealing, they are likely familiar to New Yorkers as they are a big part of New York culture.  In the beginning of the episode, Robin has done none of these, but by the end does all of them.  She has officially experienced the aspects of New York culture which make her a true New Yorker.

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment

Photojournal Week 3

Posted in Elizabeth Fruchter, Photojournal | 1 Comment

Zoolander, a Culture Capsule

Derek Zooland: Well I guess it all started the first time I went through the second grade. I caught my reflection in a spoon while I was eating my cereal, and I remember thinking “wow, you’re ridiculously good looking, maybe you could do that for a career.”

Matilda: Do what for a career?

Derek Zoolander: Be professionally good looking.

This really deep and thought provoking account about how fictional model, Derek Zoolander, discovered his path in life, encapsulates the movie Zoolander. Released in 2001, it is a comedy about the fashion industry and modeling, a satire of the times. It is a movie about an extremely stupid male model trying to find his place in the world. When hearing this quote, one may laugh.

But, if you really think about it, it’s kind of absurd: Making a career out of being good-looking? Kind of odd, no? There is no real talent involved. You do not need to be smart or skillful. Yet, in 2001 and still today, our society is so enamored by modeling and models. To the point where a society’s body image as a whole, can be deeply affected by it. Girls look through magazines and wish they were as skinny and as beautiful and privileged as these girls. The movie really captures our societies obsession with celebrity and fashion and how sometimes this obsession can become ridiculous.

Even though we are not  that far removed from 2001, a lot can happen in 9 years.  When living in time it is hard to see outside of it. That is why movies can be an interesting freeze frame of time to look at and examine. Now our culture’s obsession has shifted from the industry depicted in the movie to celebrities as almost an enterprise. In 2001, the fixation with fame and celebrity was much different than it is today.  In Zoolander, the world of the models has this aura and mystique around it. As though the general public, just knows them through an awards show or an add campaign. But today the relationship to fame and famous people has slightly shifted. Now, we know everything about everyone who is famous, thanks to dangerously stalker-ish paparazzi.

I will admit, I have fallen victim to this world of glitz and glamour, of fame and celebrity. I love it. I know all there is to know about famous actors singers, models, fashion you name it. Yet I am not completely ashamed of my knowledge. There is a fine line, for me at least, between complete stupidity and the beauty of different cultural forms. I think the idea of celebrity has been blown into this completely ridiculous world. But I do believe that a “Passion for Fashion” and knowledge of pop culture is admirable. As long as you appreciate the art form instead of just liking a singer or fashion designer because you saw her in a magazine and she is famous but you have no idea what she even does.

In the film, there is a presumption and a commentary about American culture and consumerism and how thoughtless and robotic it can be. In the movie the male model Hansel blabs, “I wasn’t like every other kid, you know, who dreams about being an astronaut, I was always more interested in what bark was made out of on a tree. Richard Gere’s a real hero of mine. Sting. Sting would be another person who’s a hero. The music he’s created over the years, I don’t really listen to it, but the fact that he’s making it, I respect that. I care desperately about what I do. Do I know what product I’m selling? No. Do I know what I’m doing today? No. But I’m here, and I’m gonna give it my best shot.”

There is this notion that that we kind of just do things and believe things because that is what the media tells us to do. The models are just pawns, eye candy to get us to be intrigued by something that may or may not be useful to us.

This movie is really a time capsule for the time it was created. Right now, it may not seem so far off from the world we live in, but years hence, when our world has shifted even further away from where we are, Zoolander will be an artifact. A funny movie that people will watch and be able to make fun of the 2000s.

Posted in 10. curator of culture, Blog | Leave a comment

Posted in Ashley Barlev, Photojournal | Leave a comment

Week 2

Posted in Peter Kramer, Photojournal | 1 Comment

YouTube as a Curator of Culture

Youtube videos are the perfect examples of the artist as a curator of culture.  I’m sure some of you won’t agree with me, but hear me out.

Youtube preserves our culture because today our culture is ruled by technology.  There’s no escaping it.  Everyone says the Internet has radically changed our life and society, and since I’m not old enough to remember what it was like beforehand, I have to believe them.  Besides, I can’t imagine life without it, which just shows how dependent and how important it is to our culture.  I doubt any of you can imagine life without it, either.

Aside from the Internet, our culture is very much about freedom, individuality and self-expression.  For example, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, etc. are all about documenting and following an individual’s life.  If you sat there and stalked someone’s facebook (as I’m sure we’ve all done), looked through all their pictures and videos, read their wallposts, etc., you would have a very clear picture of the type of person they are, who their friends are, and about their lives.

What better way to combine all four things (freedom, individuality, self-expression and Internet/technology) than through Youtube videos?

Youtube videos in general preserve ideas of our culture because of the four combined elements listed above.  There are virtually no restrictions- anyone with a video camera can upload a video, and it can be about whatever they choose.

Since anyone is free to upload a video, youtube videos are so diverse.  Anyone of any race, nationality, religion, citizenship, ect. can post a video, and everyone has an equal opportunity in representing themselves on the Internet.  In this way many different cultural communities can be conserved- religious ones, racial ones, geographical ones, common interest ones, or any other you can think of.

If that wasn’t enough to convince you, think of the youtube videos that people post.  They can post videos of whatever they want, and many people post videos of their daily lives- playing with their dog, showing off their baby, fooling around with friends, vlogging, etc.  They can also post videos discussing their opinion or views on certain issues in the news and media or life in general.  These youtube videos are similar to Facebook and other social media in that it documents parts of their lives and personalities, and puts it on the Internet for the public to view.

In that way they can be considered artists- a while back in class we spoke about how the artist puts themselves into their work and put themselves out there and make themselves vulnerable when making their work public.  The same is true for youtube videos- when you post a youtube video, you make yourself vulnerable to the comments and judgments of others.

It’s not at all uncommon to see comments on youtube videos saying nasty comments like, “This sucks. Kill yourself,” or something along those lines.  And getting negative comments can be hurtful which is why the artist as well as the vlogger make themselves vulnerable to criticism and rejection when publicizing their work.

All of the youtube videos together contribute to conserving our culture by representing the individual people who make up the population.  When looked at together as a cohesive unit, it is a truthful representation of the population and culture that is present today, at this moment.

Posted in 10. curator of culture, Blog | Leave a comment

Posted in Marinna Bradfield, Photojournal | Leave a comment

“You’ve been changing so much lately I don’t even know who you are anymore”

My brother told me this today, and it almost killed me. In his eyes, I knew this change was positive, but I am a person prone to inertia so this really bothered me. Why change when everything was fine before?

This made me reflect on all the changes I made in the short period of my existence. In middle school I went straight from the punk phase with the pink hair to the gothic phase with black lipstick (I still regret having both). One thing that hasn’t changed though is my taste in music.

During this rebellious phase I saw a movie that I found so striking (although not as much now). It is entitled SLC Punk! and it is about two punk fans in Salt Lake City, Utah. While the movie gives insight into the lives of two friends, Stevo and Bob, it also is a perfect example of different cultures in Utah in the 1980s. The film was based on the writer/director’s experience growing up in Salt Lake City, and introduces different groups present at the time (although I think there as a bit of exaggeration): there are the punks, Nazis (skinheads), rednecks, heavy metal guys, and other cliques. I think the clothing of the movie is also a way the movie preserves a culture, because it distinguishes between each group. Attitudes were reflected in clothing, and I could easily tell each group apart. The movie appealed to me at the time because it was edgy and it focused mainly on the punk clique. Now I am more interested in the way the characters change as the movie progressed.

The character Stevo is based on the director’s life, and this movie is an attempt to highlight his experience growing up. He says of the film, “…during this period there was the constant threat of nuclear war…parents were always talking about how the world could be destroyed. There was no hope, no future.” This hopelessness is reflected in the attitude of the punks, and how they put no thought into their future.

Also in the movie were landmark sites in Salt Lake City. Although I only discovered this when researching the movie I found it interesting because by using such well-known sites the director is showing that punk culture was not just an underground trend during this time. Using landmarks also introduces a New Yorker like me into the culture of a place I normally wouldn’t care about.

The movie narrates the story of two friends, but it does so in a manner that encapsulates the ideology of the punk culture, and its tensions between other groups. It is quite intriguing. The punks fought with the Nazis and they in turn fought with the metal heads. Punks were the rebellious ones and treated the corporate world with disdain.

The protagonist, Stevo is accepted to Harvard Law School but rejects the offer because he does not want to become a sell out like his father. At a party, his best friend Bob has a headache and is given medicine, which he consumes with alcohol. It was so sad how this ends up killing him. It is ironic because he is the one character in the movie that avoids drugs. When Bob dies, Stevo has a complete breakdown. He then pulls his life together and goes to Harvard, admitting in the end that he was just another poser.

The ending was by far the best part of the movie. The film depicts a time many people have forgotten and an area many are not too familiar with and thus immortalizes this area in time. The hopeful attitude towards the end left me feeling optimistic for the future, and it made me wonder if I was also a mere poser. Like Stevo, my old self would totally want to kick my ass right now, but that’s ok because things are getting better. We can document the past, but after that there is no point to remaining in it.

Citation:

http://www.sonypictures.com/classics/slcpunk/production.html

Posted in 10. curator of culture, Blog | Leave a comment

Posted in Janine-Marie Rafio, Photojournal | Leave a comment

Week of 11/7

There needs to be more of this in the world

Posted in Jacqueline Helmig, Photojournal | Leave a comment