New York City: A Rollercoaster Ride

If I’ve learned one thing about New York, it’s that there are many more problems and dark sides to New York City than good sides.

New York City is perpetuated as the one place where anyone can make it big, that you just have to work hard for it. Even a frog and his Muppet friends can make it on Broadway. Not that simple! The idea of the “American Dream” is about as false an idea as it is a motivational and inspirational notion.

New York City is a dynamic place. It’s not just a red carpet where you walk down an easily navigable, expected path to fame and success. There are many roadblocks along the way that stop social hierarchical movement temporarily or might even hinder any further success. It’s the latter view of New York City that is the true one and the view that is not exposed enough to the American public. Let me say now to anyone looking to find success in New York City: It’s not going to be easy.

In the films Breakfast at Tiffany’s and Taxi Driver, the opposite ends of the class spectrum are depicted. In Edwards’ Breakfast at Tiffany’s, the glamorous, rich side of New York is shown, and in Scorsese’s Taxi Driver, the prostitution, gambling, and drugs and the darker side of New York City are exposed. I think the true image of New York is somewhere in the middle of the spectrum depicted by these two iconic films. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but New York City is not all the glam that it’s made out to be, but it isn’t the home of the low class drug addicts either.

In New York City, anything is possible. One day, you could be better off than you had ever hoped for in your wildest dream, and the next, you could be sleeping outside on a bench. You never know what to expect. Oliver Stone’s Wall Street is the perfect example of the so-called “American Dream” hope, but also exposes the corruption that could land anyone in the dumps, as it did to Bud Fox. Bud Fox had has dreams to make it big despite being a middle class stockbroker. He tries to make it with the big boys, like Gordon Gekko, but he ultimately fails, it’s just not possible; it’s not the way that it was meant to be. There are so many obstacles in “making it big” in New York City. It could be a corrupt, unscrupulous, wealthy businessman that two-times you, and sometimes it is just the money. Taking on New York City is riding a rollercoaster. There are so many bumps and twists and turns and loops in along the way. You will find your morals and ethics challenged, as Bud Fox found, you will run into the insiders who at first are kind but then stab you in the back, you will have the failure moments when you question the reasons why you started in New York City in the first place. The point is don’t expect anything and don’t run around like a chicken with your head cut off when something goes wrong.

That being said, the people never here enough of the failure stories that might knock some sense into their brains when considering investing all they have into moving to New York City. If New York City only produced success stories, there would be no homeless guy on the sidewalk asking for money. New York City is neither black or white, but a gray.

It’s so hard to pick a favorite film, because they all depicted such different views of New York City. However, if I have to choose, the piece that stood out to me this semester was A Sucker Emcee. “I ain’t no sucker emcee.” This piece was hard hitting for me as I could relate to it. I felt that it was the most personal of the views of New York City that we witnessed this semester. Mums’ story gave me the message, “Imagine if this was you? What would your life be like?” He delivered the pain, the heartbreak, and the obstacles he had to overcome to be someone in life. I could relate to his dad dying from diabetes, since my dad has been diabetic since he was nine. That just made me feel grateful for what I do have.

Is New York City a place where your dreams come true or your worst nightmares surface?

The Irony of My Tourism

I have always felt like a tourist in my own home city. I always lived in Staten Island, which is still technically part of New York City, but I can’t connect the concrete jungle of the city skyline as a part of my home. I grew up planning trips to “the city” (a.k.a. every other borough) without a second thought of the irony of these plans- I mean, I already LIVE in the city. I realized all of this on one of those “trips”, when I visited the Manhattan High Line.

Photojournal-119

Tourism at the High Line

Much to my embarrassment as a native resident, I found myself at what may be the one of the biggest tourist attractions on the west side of Manhattan. After all, it is a place specifically designed to view Manhattan as a huge mass of buildings; homes businesses and fabulous architectural structures rising higher and higher, surrounded by water and covered with beautiful graffiti. It’s absolutely breathtaking, even if you’re familiar with the island already. It also made me realize that I can think of myself as a New Yorker all I want, but I still act like a god damned TOURIST when it comes to the boroughs that aren’t Staten Island.

Photojournal-118

A mass of buildings as seen from the High Line

This city is my home, and yet it isn’t. Staten Island is definitely my home- I am simply a visitor everywhere else. I can tell you where each Staten Island town is and how to get there, but I am truly lost as to where each area is in the other boroughs. I am not even able to tell you where most of the towns in Queens are, and I’ve been living in the Summit dorms at Queens College for half a year now. The High Line was a wake-up call to my lack of knowledge of New York City and how utterly massive my home really is. I’ve lived here for 18 years and I’m still a New York City tourist; I might just be one for the rest of my life, too.

photojournal-8

High Rock Park, Staten Island, New York –        This is what I imagine when I think of home, which starkly contrasts what I imagine when I think of New York City and what I see at the High Line.

 

A Sucker Emcee: Best Work of Art This Semester

Personally, I think A Sucker Emcee was the best work of art that I saw in this class. Not only did it take an extreme amount of talent and memorization, but also it was all 100% true to his life’s story. Unlike the movies, the dances, or the opera, this was not just a performance telling a story with a meaning; it was a narrative tale of social standards and privilege. Unlike some of the movies, like Moonstruck and The Producers, A Sucker Emcee was not a comedy: it contained both humor and seriousness while still providing a valid message to the audience. This was my favorite thing we saw in the class because it’s message holds true for everyone without being too assuming or pretentious.

When muMs began speaking, I had no idea where this performance was going: on an empty stage with no more than a turntable and a microphone. Frankly speaking, I was not expecting much. Then as muMs and Richard began, I realized that the main focus of it was going to be privilege, or lack thereof. With topics ranging from drug use and racial inequality to cockroach hotels and Alzheimer’s disease, A Sucker Emcee left the audience with a smorgasbord of ideas to think about. What I’m saying is most of the other works of art we saw in this class, with the exception of a few, spoon-fed the audience about what the artist thinks about New York City. A Sucker Emcee, on the other hand, gives you the topics, while you think about them yourself so you can come to your own conclusion.

So why is this one of the best portrayals of NYC? Well, one of the struggles it shows seems to be the most relevant and important struggles happening right now: racial inequality and its effect on people. While never specifically stated, muMs hinted at the social injustice of racial inequality throughout his whole performance.

Throughout this semester, we’ve read plays, watched movies and performances, and attended world-renowned museum exhibits, yet a one-man performance at an independent theater company had the greatest impact on me. Most of the movies we watched were simply entertaining, but didn’t seem to have a great important message. I’m not saying that every movie needs one, but I don’t think the ones we saw did. Also, while I’m a nerd for museums and exhibits, there were only a few pieces of the Brooklyn Museum seemed to have social meaning. And let’s not forget Carmen and the unforgettably perfect performance of Birds With Sky Mirrors: while those were experiences unique to NYC, they themselves had no meaning.

So how do I wrap up the last blog post with a nice little farewell to the semester, this seminar, and a final “so long” to the performances we saw, ranging from A Sucker Emcee to The Muppets Take Manhattan? Needless to say, some works of art were just entertainment, while others had both entertaining qualities and real social messages.

Unapologetic

As I take my mental walk down memory lane, it’s actually kind of hard to pick which movie was my favorite. When I think of all of the movies, I think about how much I disliked most of them. In fact, it might be easier to pick which was my least favorite. My criteria for which movies were my favorite was simple: which were the ones that I actually dedicated 80% or more of my attention to, meaning which one was I not multitasking while watching. That narrows it down to three movies: Taxi Driver, Do The Right Thing, and The 25th Hour. Out of the three, I’m not sure that I can pick out an absolute favorite. They all sparked a lot of debate and controversy in class, and honestly, I would watch those three movies again. What’s so funny about all of these movies is that I would not have watched these if it weren’t for this class, not because they are all older movies, but because they just aren’t my kind of movie. I must admit that a little part of me had always wanted to watch Breakfast at Tiffany’s. After seeing endless pictures and gifs from the movie on Tumblr, I was slightly excited to finally have an excuse to watch the movie. But honestly, it did not live up to all of the hype. It was actually offensive and boring, but to each his own right?

It’s hard to say which movie was most truthful about New York. I think, however, that each of these movies represented something different about the city: the dirty streets, the classically beautiful architecture, the overzealous men and catcalls, the crime, the list really does go on and on. But luckily I was scrolling through my Instagram feed this morning to see a post by the most melodramatic people I follow, and the connection between all of these films clicked. It was something along the lines of “I’m from NYC. That defines be. I’m not going to apologize for being me.” In each of the movies we saw, the main characters were completely unapologetic about who they were. They all knew who they were and what their direct want or need was. And I think that totally depicts New York in one shot. That’s the Big Apple.

As far as the works we’ve read this semester, I actually really enjoyed all of them. Perhaps that fact that I enjoyed reading the plays more than I enjoyed watching the movies says something about me, and it probably explains why I work in a bookstore. With that being said, the theme of being unapologetic is still present throughout the readings. In God of Carnage, both sets of parents were a little too proud to admit that they were both in the wrong at some points. The characters of In Arabia We’d All Be Kings were completely indifferent to what other people thought about them, and they didn’t care whether or not they were in the wrong.

That’s New York for you!

NYC: An Ugly Girl with a Pound of Makeup

Choosing a favorite movie is quite hard to do. I find it much easier to choose certain aspects that I enjoyed about specific movies. But, if I have to choose one, and only one right off the bat, I would have to say The Muppets Take Manhattan for the simple reason that it did not contain any offensive material to me. It’s the only movie out of the list that I would personally feeling comfortable watching with my younger sisters and parents. The plot is rather childlike and unrealistic, however it brings back the innocent Sesame Street days, and I don’t mind.

Aspects that appealed to me from Wall Street include the suspenseful plot. I really didn’t care much about class and status while watching the movie. I really didn’t even pay attention to the NY setting as much. Instead I thought it was pretty cool (for a lack of a better word) and exciting film. I particularly enjoyed the challenge of trying to decode the business messages the stock brokers shuffled around and understanding exactly how (the more technical side of things) Bud was able to save Blue Star at the end of the movie. As realistic as it seems (and perhaps it is in many ways), it is funny that the plot centers on an honest man being in a Wall Street setting having to choose between his conscience and money. Hahahaha. What a joke! You want reality? Any guy that comes in pitching stocks better be one heck of a crook. The better they get, the more trustworthy they seem. The words “conscience” and “morality” mean nothing in these firms.

As far as truthful to New York, I don’t know? When was the last time you saw a pizza shop burn to the ground because of loud music playing? Or a criminal that pulls over while being chased by police to put a bleeding dog in his trunk? In all honesty, I am having a hard time recalling all the scenes in all the movies that would happen on the moon before they would happen in NYC, but as I have said time and time again, Movies make money. That’s their job, and thats what makes them successful (and the reason they have gained enough fame for us to even be watching them in our class). Bits and pieces can be put together from the movies to create some type of  “NYC,” but I’m not sure how close it will come.

As much as I love NYC because I’m born here (well actually oceanside, but close enough) and study here, I can tell you straight up, its a pretty nasty, mundane, depressing city. Rat infested, rude people, crime, potholes, and a downright selfish city. Nudity, obscenity, drunk people, people high on pot, crack. You name it, we got it. Center of the world. Feeling the Taxi Driver in this? Every man for himself. Every women for herself. Sense of community…in your dreams. You don’t get anything here unless you fight. Fight with your teachers, your boss, your whatever. Your always under someone. You always worrying. Your always planning.  You live here working until your last breath…and if your lucky, if..you can possibly claim to be happy (for Friday night so you can actually sleep). Parking tickets, parking meters, bumper-to-bumper traffic, taxes, sky-high prices. Rules and regulations every where you go. Makes you wish you lived in a suburb where you can actually go outside and sell some lemonade without a cop demanding your permit (I got shut down by a cop when I was selling water on a summer day with my brother, I was 13). But guess what, at the end of the day, you have that badge in your pocket that you can whip out to brag about living in the city that never sleeps (just please explain to them after that you don’t actually live in Times Square and that the official city you live in is called Flushing. Yes, same spelling for flushing the toilet, as my 1st grade teacher taught me).

The Greatest City in the World?

When asked what is the first thing that comes to mind when you think of NYC most would say skyscrapers. So if Manhattan is so well known for its amazing skyline, how does it compare to Dubai? Not very well, to say the least.

To some extent I think NYC is just another city. It would be false to say that there is nothing special about NYC. However, every city is different and unique and I don’t think some skyscrapers, or times square, or the statue of liberty makes NYC any more special and worthy of attention than any other city.

However, second only to Tokyo, NYC is the richest city. I think that is definitely the reason why NYC is so idealized. Money is almost always reflected in someway in the films we watched. Wall Street, The Producers, and Breakfast at Tiffany’s clearly express the importance of money through their clothing (Hepburn’s Givenchy dress), by showing how the rich live (Bud’s and Gekko’s fancy apartments), and by straight up talking about money. These three films also portray NYC as a center of power and wealth.

My favorite film would have to be The Muppets take Manhattan. The movie was very cute and funny. I really liked the fact that it was a film for all audiences and there were some truths in the film, like the rats in the restaurants, Mrs. Piggy getting street harassed, and Kermit getting hit by a car. The movie lacked substance which was fine by me as it was very entertaining- not all films need a greater purpose.

While none of these films we watched expresses my view of NYC, the Muppets take Manhattan and Wall Street do come close. Although I don’t see the need or purpose for all the hype NYC gets, one factor that set NYC apart it would be NYC is a place where people are after money, fame, or both.

I do think that money and fame are very very very very important factors in todays society- but more so here in NYC than in perhaps any other city in the world. Wall Street and The Muppets take Manhattan are similar in that they show people (or puppets) trying to “make it big” in the city and that NYC is a place where dreams come true. However they do so in very different ways. Wall Street portrays NYC as a place where deceit is necessary to climb to the top and the rich are marked with a brand of dishonesty. Many of the famous and rich got to where they are today by cheating, selling their morals, and stepping on others. While I believe that this is accurate 8/10 times. I think its possible for someone to succeed honestly- as shown in the Muppets take Manhattan. Also the dreams of the main characters in these films are are to be rich and to be famous- two qualities which are very characteristic of New York. I think you can find so many people willing to sell out for money and fame in NYC (Anyone come to mind?). New York maintains a culture where success= money and fame. NYC is definitely a city which overly romanticizes fame and money.

 

New York City: Where Hope Lies

There is so much more to New York City than what any one view can portray. Throughout the semester we have read plays and watched various movies that have attempted to shed light on what New York City is all about. Each director or playwright highlighted the images that they found most spectacular about the city, whether this was a positive image or one full of greed and disgust. The only problem is that there is no one correct view of New York City. Just like every other city there are wealthy people and neighborhoods, and there are dangerous areas where you should be wary. Depending on what time period, location, and people you find yourself surrounded by will give you a totally different perspective of New York City.

The very first movie we watched this semester, Wall Street, brought to light the greed and corruption that is present in the financial district of New York City. In wealthy communities as seen in this movie people often find themselves overwhelmed with the need to just keep gaining more money no matter how rich they already are. The flashy life appeals to Bud, and he lets Gordon Gekko become his mentor; this leads Bud to making all kinds of immoral decision. In the end, he does not let himself sell out to Gekko’s obscene morals; he is punished for his actions and appears to be a changed man. Yasmina Reza’s God of Carnage then continued to illustrate the lack of morals that New Yorkers have. The plot is full of ex-convicts, alcoholics, and drug addicts. Despite their out of ordinary ways of going about it, they are all full of dreams and aspire to get somewhere. Most of the works we studied this semester portrayed New York City in more than one light, and we as an audience had the ability to choose what stuck out to us.

From all the works we saw this semester, Craig Wright’s Recent Tragic Events stood out to me. It was not the most descriptive in showing New York City as a whole because it focused on one event and how specific people felt during it; despite this, it was a very effective work of literature. There was something off about Andrew’s character from the beginning of the play, and when the plot revealed his connection to Waverly’s sister, I was completely immersed in it. Wright displayed the confusion that was occurring with all the 9/11 events in a very realistic way. There was so much confusion and denial on everyone’s part that no one knew how he should behave.

Deciding which of all the works is the most truthful to what New York City is all about is extremely challenging. They all highlight certain things that are very instrumental to what New York is. With how current events are turning out, I am sad to say that a movie like Do the Right Thing is a part of an image of New York that still is evident. The tragic events that occur in it continue to be a part of our society; yet, this movie is still not exactly what New York City is, at least not today. If I would have to pick one work that illustrates New York City in the most truthful way, it would be Wall Street. Most that are in New York are in search of that dream and accomplishing the impossible. On our way to trying to achieve this, we start to question our ideals. If all our true, hard work is getting us nowhere and when people like Gekko on Wall Street cheat and make it so big, why shouldn’t we be doing the same thing? Being successful and having everything makes it really complicated in standing by your morals. This was something that Wall Street demonstrated very well. It appears that it only shows the greed and corruption, but that’s not where the point lies; there are the wealthy, and there is the middle class, and so on, and we all struggle to survive one way or another, going about things in either honest or dishonest ways. That is something that occurs everywhere. In all of these works it is important to note that New York City serves as a symbol, a symbol that stands for hope and the ability to make something of yourself.

I See Myself in those Stock Market Lights

Back in November I got to spend time with one of my friends who had moved to Indiana. It’s been a weird transition for him, a Brooklyn native, to move so far away. He was telling me that in his English class, they had to write down something they wanted to do for Christmas. One of his classmates wrote that she wanted to see the Christmas tree in Rockefeller Center and he had to stop himself from laughing. All of these “New York” things really just draw in tourists; few New Yorkers actually go and see them.

The glorification of New York is everywhere in popular culture. From music to movies, New York is always the place to be. It’s the center of the universe to many. But is it really?

My favorite movies from this semester were The Muppets Take Manhattan and The Producers. They were both lighthearted and hilarious, and a nice breather from the heavy, drudging films that otherwise filled our syllabus. Even though they were comedies, they both still had a heavy dose of reality in both. The Muppets showed us that you have to work hard to make it, but you still can in the end. The Producers showed us that there are cons out there that want to exploit art for a profit.

However, I don’t think either of those works showcased the true New York City. Why? Because in Muppets, the good guys win out and the show is a hit and in The Producers Max and Leo just keep doing their thing (in prison, but still). The only film that really captured New York was undoubtedly Oliver Stone’s Wall Street. Stone shows New York as the urban jungle that it is, and more importantly shows the people who live here accurately. Deep inside, we all have bits of Bud Fox and Gordon Gekko in us. We’re like Bud because we want to get ahead in life; we’re like Gekko because sometimes we don’t mind stamping on others to get there. We’re even like Darien in that we’ll use others as a means to support ourselves.

Wall Street forces the viewer to examine him or herself. If you weren’t riveted by Gekko’s ‘greed is good’ speech, it was probably because you were too busy trying to deny that he was right. In a world where money is everything, greed is natural. It’s even good! Without greed, we’ll just get stuck where we are, no upward mobility for anyone. Maybe greed for money itself is negative, but greed for a better life isn’t so negative. However, the issue comes with the realization that more often than not, a better life is facilitated by more money. So how do you get money? If you’re Bud, you play the stock market game with an unfair advantage. If you’re Gekko, it takes you a while to get caught, but you live the life you want for the time that you’re under the radar and that’s not so bad. Wall Street is the truest reflection of New York because it has brutal honesty without being sensationalist or superfluous. Every person wants to get ahead and in the urban jungle of NYC sometimes you can’t do that by keeping your hands out of the mud. Sometimes you’ve got to get elbow deep in it. And sometimes you get caught.

The Truth of NYC Revealed

Many non-New Yorkers think that New York City is the city “where dreams are made of”, where “there’s nothing you can’t do.” Alicia Keys and Jay Z state these lines in their song “Empire State of Mind.” However, movies such as Wall Street by Oliver Stone depict that achieving everything you want comes with consequences and difficulties. There are definitely loads of opportunities available for everyone in New York. But, these opportunities require a person to be willing to sacrifice different aspects of their lives.

Gordon Gekko epitomizes what might result from a New Yorker who attempts to achieve his or her full potential. Gordon Gekko rises to the top through corrupt means and heartlessly maintains his position in the upper class of New York. Gekko, a self-made millionaire, is willing to go to any extent to gain more money. His character is shown to be one with a huge ego and a small conscience. This accurately depicts how people in the upper class are willing to go to any extreme to maintain their wealth.

Additionally, Stone uses Bud Fox to illustrate that many people try to achieve their high dreams/expectations in New York. This also represents most of the population of New York City that tries to achieve this higher-class status. Therefore, Bud is a vital character in the film who serves as a representative of many New Yorkers. Bud’s attempt to attain success under Gekko’s wings is a very common situation in New York. Many people attempt to achieve success or money through networking/associations. Think about it… even students in college try to make connections knowing that they will one day come in handy. However, Bud’s attempt to transform from a middle-class status to a higher-class status leads to a character transformation. This transformation is shown through his character change and even his room change. He becomes more interested in material success and subsequently his values start to decline. His father also represents the people who are a part of the working class. However, unlike Bud, Carl is satisfied with his middle class position. Carl represents the hard workingman who earns money through honest methods. It is clear through the events in the film, that the working class struggles to maintain its money. The various characters and their positions in society represent Stone’s interpretation of the class structure that exists in New York.

blog

To sum up, Wall Street was my favorite work of art this semester. I enjoy how Stone demonstrates how the capitalistic system works, the class structure that exits, and the various methods of achieving/maintaining success in New York City. This film demonstrates the truth about what living in New York City is like and it touches on every class that exists. Stone did a great job at exposing the truth and everyone who thinks that dreams just magically turn into a reality in New York should definitely watch this film!

Wall Street: Money=Power=Privilege

(As of matter of fact) GREED IS GOOD - by Charlie Crowell

Throughout this seminar class, we have watched many movies that revolved around the New York setting, with each film uniquely conveying its own message about this fascinating city. My favorite work, however, was definitely Wall Street by Oliver Stone. It depicted the corporate world of NY and revealed a very important truth about it: becoming a success in such a competitive environment often requires resorting to corruption and getting ones hands dirty. It’s unfortunate, but it’s inevitable, and like they say: it is what it is, right?

Stone literally (and accurately) portrayed Wall Street as a jungle: there exist people like Bud Fox, who are the vulnerable prey trying hard to survive and make a living, and then there are people like Gordon Gekko, who are the voracious predators destroying and eating anyone in their way just to make it big in the city.

And with such a jungle-like atmosphere inescapably comes the application of Charles Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest. Unlike Gekko, Bud was unfit for working in such a risky, dangerous, competitive world. On the other hand, Gekko, the opulent and legendary stockbroker who Bud aspired to become, took advantage of Bud, who was so desperate to become affluent like him, and got him to do insider trading for him.

In the end, Bud lost everything he ever really cared about. He lost his girlfriend, Darien, betrayed his father and led him to a heart attack, compromised his moral integrity, and was arrested and looking at jail time for insider trading. But what ever happened to Gekko you might ask? Nothing. What a joke! It’s sad, but truth of the matter is that rich people have money, and that equals power. And with this power comes privilege. Simple.

I really appreciated this movie for it showed how greedy the human mind really is (even though we often don’t want to admit it). One quote that really spoke to me from Wall Street was when Michael Douglass notoriously stated: “Greed is good.” And in class, I couldn’t help but notice that many people viewed this quote as something negative; after all, greed is bad, right?

But honestly, if you really think so, you’re just being a HYPOCRITE! Just like fear, anger, sex, and rivalry, greed is ALSO a natural human instinct. Greed is actually the mere gathering of resources that allow an organism to survive and reproduce, and the more the better! These resources range from food, to water, to shelter. Without these things, the organism dies. And in this capitalistic society, money becomes a very important resource for survival, because without it we can’t provide for ourselves.

And this is exactly what I loved about the movie: it showed the true nature of the human mind that we all possess and don’t like to admit we have.