This article is designed for public educational purposes. As a result, it cannot be considered as an unbiased source, the information has been simplified to appeal to a larger audience. However, the idea of using a kite to map possible solutions for the canal brings the idea of using fun activities to engage the support of the communities, even with the children. At the same time, it’s use of people’s voices within the project is something that can be exploited within our own.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/for-local-residents-a-mission-to-clean-up-the-gowanus-canal/
– Jessen Thomas
Jessen, You start: “This article is designed for public educational purposes. As a result, it cannot be considered as an unbiased source.” I don’t follow your logic. Why can’t public educational materials be unbiased?