Author Archives: ipulatov

Man Push Cart – Review Essay

Man Push Cart, by Ramin Baharani, is about Ahmed Razvi, a Pakistani immigrant trying to make ends meet with a pushcart. In Pakistan he was a rock star, but each day now he commutes from his apartment in Brooklyn to Midtown Manhattan, to a corner on Avenue of the Americas, ready to sell coffee bagels by 3 a.m. He also sells bootleg adult films. His wife died after immigrating, and their son lives with Ahmed’s in-laws. Ahmed works hoping to one day make enough to live with his son. He temporarily befriends Mohammad, a rich Pakistani, who recognized him as a singer and hired him to help him financially. Ahmed also forms a romance with Noemi, a Spaniard who runs a newsstand. He adopts a cat too, which helps him cope emotionally, but it dies shortly. After having paid 5,000 dollars for the first installment, Ahmed’s cart is stolen. This is a devastating blow, and he’s forced to beg for financial help from the person he was buying from, Noori. The film portrays Ahmed’s life as lonely, confined, desolate, and bordering on desperation within a prosperous and indifferent urban landscape. Regardless of his past, now he has no choice but to start from scratch and keep working his pushcart until things get better, but don’t look like they will.

The film is compelling because of artistic choices that don’t advance the plot but give the viewer a greater understanding for Ahmed’s circumstances. For example, there are multiple, repetitive shots of Ahmed sleeping on a train ride home or to Manhattan, dragging his pushcart down the street, selling his bagels and coffee during the day. Showing these situations again and again gives the sense of his monotonous and boring lifestyle.

Additionally, many conversations magnify and highlight the struggles Ahmed and people like him have to go through. In one scene, Ahmed’s talking to a character who looks Pakistani, and who tells of a friend “living the life” because he’s in Albany working at Dunkin’ Donuts, which highlights just how poor these immigrants are. In another scene, one Pakistani character shows a scar on his stomach, while someone else explains to a group that he was stabbed up the gut for being a “terrorist.” This conversation conveys how Pakistanis struggle with maintaining their identity and with their safety because of American prejudices.

Moreover, many of the shots of the Manhattan setting show just how insignificant Ahmed’s pushcart is compared to the city, and how depressing his situation is. Whenever he is dragging his cart down the street, one always sees cars driving past, while he’s walking hunched over. There are also many shots of skyscrapers towering over him and his pushcart. To make the mood gloomy, many scenes take place in the dark, either outside at night or inside, and the few scenes outdoors in the daytime mostly take place in rain.

Man Push Cart leaves out many details, like why Ahmed’s in America and how his wife died. However, our lack of knowledge about Ahmed reflects how he knows so few people, and those he knows, he doesn’t know well or questions if he knows at all. For example, he asks for but does not get 5,000 dollars from Mohammad, who isn’t a close friend by any stretch. Also, he suspects that Noori, someone he considered a friend, and the one to whom he pays installments, stole his cart after the first payment.

Ahmed’s story shares elements with that of many other immigrants. He lost his identity. His ethnic group is a victim of prejudice. Ahmed hasn’t much social capital, but he has some. Mohammad helped him by hiring him to paint his apartment. This is a clear example of social capital, how immigrants of the same ethnic group will support each other and lend each other money.

If “you are what you eat, where you eat, and because you eat out,” then Ahmed doesn’t exist, because he never eats out. He does sell food, but the food he sells is the cheapest and most basic there is. The food he sells does show that he is assimilating, because he must appeal to an on the go New York market.

This film shows an immigrant who cannot advance without cultural, economic, and social capital. Ahmed barely has any of these. He has no family except his in-laws, who greatly dislike him, no connections, no money, and no education, and so he’s forced to stay working in a low-income job to sustain himself.

Man Push Cart lets us experience and emotionally connect with the life of someone with whom many New Yorkers interact but about whom few New Yorkers think. Ahmed’s circumstances are shared by those in newsstands, those selling umbrellas outside when it’s raining, and all those getting by, by any means necessary. After this film a New Yorker will never look at a street vendor, or any struggling immigrant, the same way again, but rather as someone with a history, a lost identity, a family, aspirations, and struggles.

On a larger scale, and bigger picture, we see a wealth gap between Ahmed and the Americans he sells to, and yet he is working tirelessly from 3 a.m., then selling DVDs on the side, and yet lacks the capital necessary to advance himself. This film would benefit policy makers and Americans in general, to rethink how possible the American dream and economic advancement really is for someone that really starts from nothing and works tirelessly, and how to actually make the dream a possibility.

 

Questions on Restaurants Reading

In Gastropolis, the author points out that restaurants are used for assimilation, because eating out is eating American and this helps immigrants negotiate their identity. But, I don’t think it’s that simple. Another dimension to it is that when people open up ethnic restaurants, they cheat on the authenticity of the food to appeal to Americans, and so the people of that ethnic group coming there are still getting assimilated. So when Chinese people open up a store that isn’t authentic to appeal to Americans, the owners themselves are assimilating and so are the Chinese people coming in. So the question is, it’s clear that a Bengali man is assimilating when he eats out at American restaurants, but is he also assimilating, and having his identity changed, inadvertantly, when going to a Bengali restaurant, because business owners want to appeal to Americans? How much of a factor are non-“American” restaurants in assimilation?

Questions on Market Readings

When reading about these push carts and the peddlers, I kept thinking of the halal carts, like the ones we have right outside of our college. Although they’re not such a problem here, they can be a problem in a place like the East Village, which is very close to the lower east side. In fact, here’s an article about how people in East Village don’t like the then newly arrived Halal cart -http://nypost.com/2013/12/29/east-villagers-bash-new-halal-food-cart/. To sum up their complaints, the cart smells bad, makes noise both by attracting people and with its generator, is dirty, can cause people to crowd up the block, and because of all of this, devalues the homes. The readings talked about how officials wanted to get rid of the pushcarts because they crowded and noise-polluted the streets, made the area look more ethnic then they wanted, and took business away from merchants. Today we have halal carts, waffle trucks, roasted peanut stands, etc. I know that these people have to get permission from the government, but under what conditions do you think the government would be justified in getting rid of these carts and trucks? In other words, in what cases and under what circumstances are these entities hurting the neighborhood as opposed to helping it?

Latina Obesity in the United States

I have a few questions, so I’ll just say all of them.

1) Is the best solution to fixing obesity among Latinos to educate them more or to change government policies?

People get fat because fatty foods are so cheap, like 1 dollar burgers at McDonald’s, and any rules that try to fix that will be inherently opposing free market principles. When Bloomberg tried to limit how much soda we could buy, he came under attack and was ridiculed, but anything else done to make people eat less would be the same idea and come under scrutiny.

2) What changes in policy can stop the trend in obesity, or curtail it? Or, should the government just stay out of it?

3) Does the obesity among Latinos change depending on where they live, and who they live around?

Question on “But is it Authentic”

In “But is it Authentic,” the author describes food as an art, and that the contributions of the dish and of the experience-er are both important. Every person will have a different experience based on how familiar they are with the food or with the ingredients. Regarding art, such as paintings, or maybe even poetry, my understanding is that although the artist might mean one thing when creating his art, the work of art itself can mean many things, as long as that meaning can be supported with sufficient evidence. Someone with one set of experiences can interpret the exact same words of a poem just as well but differently as someone with different experiences. With that being said, do you think food is more like art or less like art? The cook might intend to install certain flavors in a dish, target specific taste buds and activate specific sensations, maybe even remind the eater of another food. But, what the taster experiences is largely based on what kinds of foods he has eaten before and how much of them. Even the wording of the food or ingredients or the atmosphere changes the experience. For example, someone from India will probably think something Americans think is spicy as a lot less so. So once again, considering this, is food more or less like art?

Questions on “But is it Authentic”

In “But is it Authentic,” the author describes food as an art, and that the contributions of the dish and of the experience-er are both important. Every person will have a different experience based on how familiar they are with the food or with the ingredients. Regarding art, such as paintings, or maybe even poetry, my understanding is that although the artist might mean one thing when creating his art, the work of art itself can mean many things, as long as that meaning can be supported with sufficient evidence. Someone with one set of experiences can interpret the exact same words of a poem just as well but differently as someone with different experiences. With that being said, do you think food is more like art or less like art? The cook might intend to install certain flavors in a dish, target specific taste buds and activate specific sensations, maybe even remind the eater of another food. But, what the taster experiences is largely based on what kinds of foods he has eaten before and how much of them. Even the wording of the food or ingredients or the atmosphere changes the experience. For example, someone from India will probably think something Americans think is spicy as a lot less so. So once again, considering this, is food more or less like art?