Macaulay Honors College Seminar 4 | Professor Robin Rogers

Author: patrieceausili

Chapter 11&12 Response

Housing and rental discrimination still persist today.  In the past, discrimination was more open and overt; today, it is subtle.  Minority buyers and renters are treated less favorably than whites.  Whites generally are given more information, help, and options than minorities by realtors, bankers, and insurance providers.  For example, banks have become stricter to minorities, offering “higher down payments and less favorable mortgage rates.”  As a result, minorities have a tougher time buying a house.  Very little has been done to dismantle the segregated neighborhoods.  Real estate practices continue to contribute to residential segregation. Even today, the Fair Housing Act is not adequately enforced.  For example, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is processing fewer complaints, it is taking longer to process complaints, and victim compensation has declined.

I truly believe that educating those in poverty can help decrease urban poverty rates. Inner city schools should provide equal opportunities to students that other schools in the U.S. offer. If funding is an issue for inner city schools, then the government should increase the schools’ funding (easier said than done). Federal aid and programs can work but they are seriously flawed. Many people that qualify to receive aid can use the assistance. But if they are working and receive raises for doing well or promoted to a higher position with a higher wage, those once eligible for aid will no longer be eligible. Thus, these people can be worse off if they receive a wage increase. We can’t slightly open the door for those in poverty and then shut the door once they reach the handle. I remember one class we spoke about whether a job application should have a box to check for those that were incarcerated. If the box disappeared, many more people will be able to get jobs and support their families. Of course those that sexually molested children shouldn’t be able to work in a daycare (or anywhere). But the people who were busted for petty crimes, such as carrying drugs in their pocket, should be able to work.

Chapter 10 Response Paper

Chapter 10 in the CQ reader discusses wealth and inequality. Income inequality is an issue that I believe will be debated about until humans go extinct. And I only said debated. Will it be addressed and combatted? It has been, but the gap in income between the affluent and the poor is widening. So will income inequality be combatted effectively? I’m not sure.

I agree that there does need to be income inequality for the economy to thrive, but not an enormous gap we have now and will continue to have. Yes, economic growth is thriving, but the people that aren’t the wealthiest 1% are struggling. The price of everything is increasing and income isn’t increasing at the rate it should for the people that need it to. The rich’s consumption increases and the middle- and working-class’s consumption decreases. And it will continue to decrease if middle-class stores and restaurants decrease as well.

Education inequality is a factor that adds to income inequality. The rich are provided with the necessary tools to succeed and have the money to do so. The middle and working classes aren’t provided with the same opportunities as the rich. Mayor de Blasio passed the Fair Student Funding and it is helping certain schools, but other schools aren’t eligible or don’t receive adequate funding from the program. Personal responsibilities and choices do increase chances for social mobility. But the same opportunities must be provided for those born in the bottom 5% that are provided for others. Otherwise upward social mobility rates will not increase.

Increasing tax on the rich is too much to ask for. Because if I made $1 billion and I’m taxed 49% of that, I wouldn’t know how to live on only $500 million. And I definitely would have lost my desire to make more money.

We have a champagne class distribution of wealth, and the middle class is diminishing. Soon we’ll have only two distinct sections: the rich and the poor.

Chapter 9&11 Response

Homelessness isn’t only an issue involving poverty. Income inequality and increasing housing costs are factors that add to homelessness, and fixing those factors can help decrease the likelihood of a family becoming homeless.

Also, many kids born in working class family neighborhoods don’t receive the same quality of education kids receive in middle class family neighborhoods. The inequality in education needs to be eradicated and more opportunities, such as job training and fun activities that will build skills needed later in life, need to be provided for kids that are in the lower SES.

I agree with Nunez and Culhane that the homeless must be provided with services such as job training, other educational services, and mental and physical health care instead of just being plopped into housing. Some can really utilize the services if they are provided with it, and others might not need it. But for some, providing education services and health care can help end a cycle of homelessness.

Housing and rental discrimination still persist today.  In the past, discrimination was more open and overt; today, it is subtle.  Minority buyers and renters are treated less favorably than whites.  Whites generally are given more information, help, and options than minorities by realtors, bankers, and insurance providers.  For example, banks have become stricter to minorities, offering “higher down payments and less favorable mortgage rates.”  As a result, minorities have a tougher time buying a house.  Very little has been done to dismantle the segregated neighborhoods.  Real estate practices continue to contribute to residential segregation. Even today, the Fair Housing Act is not adequately enforced.  For example, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is processing fewer complaints, it is taking longer to process complaints, and victim compensation has declined.

I am unsure if I would be for blocking HUD’s new fair-housing rule or against. I agree that people should choose where they want to live without government interference. But I’m also for reducing racial segregation and providing people access to better resources. I’m leaning more towards against blocking it, but who am I to say that people have to live in certain areas even if they don’t want to.

Chapter 8 Response Paper

How does the U.S. end slavery, continue to hold African Americans and other minorities from thriving, and expect them to feel equal? Legal segregation ended, but segregation and discrimination continues. I always read about the wealth gap, and it amazes me every time. Blacks’ household net worth is $11,000 vs. whites’ almost $142,000. Feagin says that white families had generations to increase their wealth, improve their education, and improve their overall lifestyles that others weren’t allowed to have access to. It’s true and there’s no denying that. I agree with Feagin that the crime economy is sometimes the only option that many blacks in poverty have, because doors are shut in their faces. And I think opening The Smithsonian Natural Museum of African American History and Culture is a great step towards introducing the side of history that is untold and many try to forget.

I think, in theory, improving police interactions with African Americans would improve race relations. African Americans would be able to feel protected instead of targeted by the police. But FBI Director James Comey acknowledges that the police racially profile black Americans. I don’t think improvements in the interactions will improve race relations because there are going to be more incidents that draw attention to the race of the subjects and divide black Americans and the police even more. Law enforcement should definitely try, and continue to try in the future to improve relations, but I don’t see improvements in relations happening anytime soon. In NYC in 2014, 54% of blacks were stopped and frisked compared to 12% of whites, and whites account for the majority of the population. I think those numbers will remain stable if stop and frisk is continued.

I think schools should emphasize desegregation and reintegrate. I went to a public school that had numerous races and ethnicities, and the diversity I grew up with was awesome. I learned from other cultures, and they learned from me. But there will be opposition to reintegration. I remember listening to a journalist’s recording of a high school PTA meeting that discussed the high school’s recent acceptance of minority students to come to the school because the minority students’ school had closed down (I think. It was a long time ago). The point is, one of the moms was speaking and said the minority students will bring the school’s test scores down, that the minority students’ don’t have the capabilities to do well with the other (white) students, and that they shouldn’t be sent here. The outcome……. the minority students had to go to a high school with other minority students. I think reintegration can be positive, and not every school is equal. And George Theoharis puts it perfectly by stating that “[w]e have enough history in this country of being unable to achieve separate but equal schools.”

Chapter 7 Response

Gangs are becoming more sophisticated and law enforcement has to keep up. Gangs are using social media to recruit people. I wonder how they use social media and if the gangs are worried about a trail left behind because nothing is a secret on the internet. And I wonder what is posted on their sites? Many gangs have turned to human trafficking and law enforcement officials overlook gangs’ involvement in human trafficking more now. Human trafficking affects 20+ million people and it’s an organized business that needs more law enforcement attention.

I believe educating youths, offering job training programs and extracurricular activities can help reduce the likelihood of gang members that are vulnerable to becoming recruited. Others may not agree, but letting youths know there are other options than becoming a gang member can be beneficial. And the youths can’t just be told about the offers, they need guidance along the way because there will be gangs pressuring them to join.

The CQ chapter states that some gang crimes are not reported enough because they keep a low profile. For example, Asian gangs aren’t territorial and they victimize their community members. What is unfortunate is the fact that the members of the community don’t report the crimes because of fear (I would be afraid, too), but also language barriers. The members of the community shouldn’t feel that language barriers are in the way of justice. Law enforcement should have more translators if there aren’t enough, and law enforcement should educate communities that speaking another language is not an issue if they need help.

Injunctions sounds like it can work, but gang members will also be more careful about meeting in public and can avoid injunctions. But injunctions also rely on profiling as the CQ chapter says police and prosecutors make their own list of what gang members look like. I understand what Morreale says, that “the more gangs get hassled for the little things, the less time they have for the big things,” but it’s also not okay for people to be at family party or walking home late and be in violation.

Chapter 6 Response

Racial and ethnic profiling have been around for centuries, and no matter how outdated it is, profiling persists today. As the CQ discusses, racial profiling exists in the police force. Racial and ethnic profiling had been fought before, but the “Black Lives Matter” movement really shed light on the situation to people that didn’t notice or care to notice before. And it’s a shame people, specifically minority men and women, had to die in order for the broader public to open their eyes and realize how their fellow Americans are treated.

Mac Donald said the aggressive stop-and-frisk policies in NYC lead to crime to decline in the 1990s. She adds that minorities benefited from the tactics, and it is important to bring safety to poor neighborhoods. Others say stop-and-frisk is over-enforcing and driving a wedge between law enforcement and the general population. I agree with the latter. Personally, if I saw more cops in my neighborhood I would take my business elsewhere. High crime neighborhoods have an over abundant amount of officers conducting stop-and-frisk procedures on Americans. Instead of focusing on the number of officers in an area, new strategies should be devised to improve the quality of stop-and-frisk, as the Police Executive Research Forum report suggested. The CQ provides the wedge between law enforcement and the public by stating 73% of blacks say they are treated less fairly and 54% Hispanics say they are treated less fairly as well.

At the end of the chapter, Obama said, “when any part of the American family does not feel like it is being treated fairly, that’s a problem for all of us,” means us Americans as a whole need to combat any obstacle one of us faces, together. I know I won’t understand how it feels to be racially or ethnically profiled, but it affects many Americans today and new law enforcement techniques and strategies must be established.

If It Weren’t For You Two

“I lost my mother ten years ago. She raised me and my brother in a single-family home. My mother worked for AT&T from 5:30am to 5pm, and slept on the weekends. When crime rates in our neighborhood was rising, my mother made me do my homework and stay out of trouble. I finished high school at fifteen years old, but my mother wouldn’t let me graduate. I took gym and vocational classes to stay in school. I was a C-average student, focusing my time on sports. My high school track team once qualified for state championships, but one of the relay runners fell sick and could not compete. To get the open spot, I had to race another teammate. As I was stretching before the race, I saw my mother in the stands. She could barely come to my meets at the time, but she took off of work early that day to watch me run. My mother told me to focus and that I had the opportunity to do something. However, she was gone as I finished the race. When I saw her at home later, I asked her why she came but left early. She said that I needed to know that she was with me as I ran, even if she didn’t get to see me finish. If it wasn’t for sports and my mother, I probably would have been a pregnant teen on welfare.”

(Queens, New York)

Chapter 4: Air Pollution and Climate Change, Patriece Ausili

I was shocked when I read Jeff Holmstead statement that said, “All the companies I deal with are concerned about greenhouse gases.  And pretty much all of them think the Clean Power Plan is not a lawful way of doing this.” What also isn’t lawful is the amount of deaths per year due to air pollution that the companies contribute to. So to cut carbon emissions to save lives and the planet shouldn’t be such a problem but to the companies, money is more important.

Some people see things differently and see that the cost of changing is too great. Coal burning industries contribute to excessive green house gas emissions, while natural gas emits half the carbon emissions than coal when used to generate electricity. This change isn’t costly and industries have yet to switch. The government should intervene and make changes when necessary. The temperature is going to rise two degrees at the rate we’re going? OK, let’s implement a change and cut green house gas emissions. Unfortunately, it’s not that easy. There are many opponents to changing traditional coal industries. The government should also intervene in the market place because if market forces continue to pick winners and losers, when will clean and renewable energy sources be able to provide more energy without help?

Obama’s Clean Power Plan aims to cut emissions 32% by 2030. The plan aims to limit emissions of power plants because they are the biggest contributor to carbon emissions. But as a society, we can limit our emissions as well. Automobiles are very very very very fuel inefficient. The U.S.’s second largest greenhouse gas emissions is transportation. About 86% of fuel that is pumped into the tank of an automobile is used for something other than driving. Only 14% of the fuel put into car is actually used to move the car. More fuel efficient automobiles need to be considered to cut down on air pollution, and we can take mass transit to help (and mass transit needs to become better in general, too).

The EPA should impose regulations and restrictions when greenhouse gas emissions are out of hand and become a hazard to society, as the EPA did when they proposed the Clean Power Plan. There needs to be a limitation on emissions, and a movement towards natural gas and renewable energies in order to have cleaner air that people are supposed to have, and to limit more extreme weather events, because we ignored climate change for so long that avoiding it is impossible.

Video Response – Patriece Ausili

Brandon Stanton says he must “steer the conversation away from pre-constructed answers” while interviewing people, and wants the honest truth, not what the interviewees think the right answer is. How can I point out the honest truth and steer the conversation? I feel I’ll understand once the interviews occur but I’m not exactly 100%. What if I try to steer their answers and it turns out to be a disaster? How do I steer their answers to honest answers with an invisible hand?

During the interview, Stanton wants to understand the person and not to squeeze him/her into a political category. If the class is interviewing people with an issue in mind, we will have policy ideas that they will fit in to. I thought I should ask questions about their lives that don’t pertain to any policy issues I previously had in mind, and maybe I would understand the individual just a bit more. Thoughts anyone?

While I watched the ethnography video, I kept thinking how I have to speak to strangers and how can I make them feel comfortable when I will most definitely not be comfortable. I know the interviewee must be comfortable for reliable data to be told. But what do I do? Fluff up a pillow for them and let them know I’m nervous as well? I understand the video but understanding what to do and actually doing it are completely different. At the end of the video, Colleen Murray suggests to watch other interviewers to see the ethnography process. I probably need a run through of an interview process, for example, to understand what transitions words to use, but not transition words that will make the rapport weaker.

The video also suggested that interviewers can’t just observe what their interviewees are saying, but the interviewers must participate with the interviewees. But if I’m interviewing people about human trafficking or homelessness, I can’t participate as they are forced to work and I can’t sleep with the homeless overnight (I mean I could but not if I just met them). I don’t want to butcher their stories. How do I work my way around that and truly understand my interviewees if I can’t participate?