Animation: Changing and What Was

Animation

 

I used more than three images for this animation but they all revolved around these three terms: darkness, change, and shadows. I started with the image of a path half in shadows and half in light. I took this picture for our first video assignment but it really reminded me of a balance leaning towards the darkness.

The swan that I originally took a picture of was black and I found that very intriguing. We normally think of swans as white, pure creatures but the black one with a red beak was just as pure, even if it wasn’t white in color. I decided to use that as a representation of change and darkness because it has been changed but I believe that, even in change, the essence of everything remains. The black swan had changed physically but it was still graceful as it glided across a pond in the Bronx Zoo.

Halfway through, there is a horizontal image of a shadow of a person (me!) and I had that picture to show, aside from the actual shadows, of what was. This was another representation of change but rather than the actual change, I wanted to focus on what was left after the change. I also changed the colors of the original light and dark path to black and white to show the “what was.”

Lastly, I decided rather than having too many moving images, I wanted to make an animation for the color experience. I changed the hue and saturation of the different images and overlapped them to show the change. Gradually, the images become less and less recognizable. They become more like blurs of color intermixing until it’s impossible to tell what is what at the end.

This is how my middle image looked like. There’s the shadow and the park and the black-and-white color shows the change and what was. Thinking about it, the shadow seems like a person looking back at their memories.

0066

 

 

Comics on Display

Have you ever seen sections of the funny papers in museums? I can’t say I have, well cartoonist Art Spiegelman once again has an opportunity to do so. The article I have read tells of how a collection of his art is now being shown on display at the Jewish Museum. Also of Spiegelman’s long career of drawing, publishing and editing. His work is intertwined with the emotions and lessons he has learned in his life. Now everyone has the opportunity to mull over his work in great detail.

250px-Maus

This is not the first time Spiegelman has had his work on display. In 1991 he had a solo at the Museum of Art. The showing exhibition contained only one work, Spiegelman’s book length pictorial narrative “Maus”. This graphic novel depicts an interview Spiegelman has with his father about experiences as a Polish Jew and Holocaust survivor. These factual accounts paint Polish Jews as mice and Germans as cats. It is a very interesting spin to a very serious and horrible event. In 1992 it was the first graphic novel to win a Pulitzer Prize.

Spiegelman has produced about a half centuries worth of art. In the show you it is clear the he has never stuck to one type of style. Each section on display emphasizes a different visual and mental theme. Even from an early age Spiegelman showed skill in comics. He was born in Sweden in 1948, to two World War II Holocaust survivors. He grew up in Queens, New York and drew his first comic strip the “Loonies” when he was 12 years old. He sold his first drawing to a newspaper at age 17.

In his professional career Spiegelman worked with MAD magazine and ZAP Comix. In his early work he drew much of his style and inspiration from artists such as Harvey Kurtzman, R. Crumb, and Basil Wolverton. One aspect that is found continuously in Spiegelman’s work is his use of autobiographical content. One example of this can be seen in his strip “Prisoner on the Hell Planet,” where he recounts of his awful experiences while hospitalized for a mental breakdown, after his mother committed suicide. This strip contains a more harsh and intense style, which Spiegelman used once and then moved on.

Spiegelman then became less bold he worked on “he took on steady bread-and-butter jobs.” He began designing trading card and stickers for chewing gum. It was not until 1980 he started RAW magazine, which mad comics into an avant-garde art form. He invited artists such as Gary Panter, Sue Coe and Chris Ware whose works were shown in galleries. It was in RAW magazine that Spiegelman first published “Maus” one chapter at a time. Then exhausted Spiegelman began designing children’s books, but was shocked back into comics after witnessing the 2001 World Trade Center attack at close range.

Art Spiegelman’s comic prowess is once again on display for all to see. You can appreciate the time and effort of the pieces because the display showcases first drafts and original manuscripts. Emily Casden, a curatorial assistant, at the Jewish Museum has taken the time to really celebrate an amazing artist.

I would like to know how you feel about comic art and whether it can be perceived as art worth putting in museums like paintings and photographs.

Cotter, Holland “A Master’s Bubbles and Panels, in Depth.” New York Times 16 November 2013: C1. Print.

 

Simpsons sold to FXX: Why do we care?

“The Simpsons” is moving to cable television. FXX, a relatively new network offspring of FX, recently bought the cable and streaming rights to the 24 seasons (and ongoing).

The purchase price is not publicly disclosed, but analysts estimate that the highly grossing show was bought for a whopping price in the range of $550 million to $1 billion (or more). It will begin airing in August 2014.

But why FXX? The only notable animated shows FX broadcasts/broadcasted are/were Archer and Unsupervised — one of which received solid ratings. One would expect Adult Swim — known for its re-runs of McFarland’s animated comedies and other animated shows — to add “Simpsons” to its lineup. Though after reviewing the lackluster ratings of shows that have moved from FX TO FXX — “Totally Biased with W. Kamau Bell” lost more than 80% of its viewers after the move — one can clearly see why FXX desperately needs a show like “Simpsons.” With more than 530 episodes, the show can be broadcasted on a daily basis and never have to repeat an episode for more than a year.

The real question is: How will those without cable television be able to watch reruns of the show? Netflix won’t be able to stream the show due to FXX’s exclusive rights. The show will also no longer be on Fox. It seems like quite a lot of people will be getting the short end of the stick.

 

Source:

Carter, Bill. “‘Simpsons’ Reruns Sold to FXX in First Cable Deal.” The New York Times. The New York times Company, 15 Nov. 2013. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.

Lou Reed’s New York Was Hell or Heaven- NY Times Blog Post

This past October, New York City suffered a great loss of an iconic, New York City native, musician, songwriter, and singer-Lou Reed. His lyrics possessed a moving rhythm and powerful message that no other artist has ever competed with. He did what he wanted and left all criticism behind. As a tribute to his very recent death, the NY times commemorated Reed’s life and work as a musical visionary in New York City.

For those who didn’t know, like myself prior to this article, Lou Reed was a rock and roll legend who helped shape rock music for approximately 50 years. Reed wrote classic songs about everything and anything in New York City.  Some of his greatest songs include “Walk on the Wild Side”, “Perfect Day”, and “Satellite of Love”, all from his 1972 album “Transformer.” According to the article, these songs “mixed rough street reportage with playful, trippy musings,” and it is definitely evident in his music!

Reed is known to be one of the few artists who accurately echo the great triumph of NYC going from a city of drugs, violence, and graffiti, to an impeccable mecca of luxury retail and extravagant buildings. While much of his work is an emotionally dark chaos of rhythmic tunes, it also reflects his ability to experiment with different styles of music, his perception on life, and his his own personality.

Reed’s lyrics showed the side of New York that not many people actually understand and experience. If you attentively analyze his lyrics, you can notice some implied themes of sex and drug usage in clubs as a casual activity (specifically noted in “Walk on the Wild Side”) and other themes like hustlers and drag queens on the street. Reed has been widely renowned for the underlining dark tone in his songs, yet his work still managed to make his listeners feel a strong passion and emotion for the city.

After listening to a couple of his songs, and living in NYC for my whole life, I am speechless that I have never listened to his music. Reed’s mark about New York City’s rise and fall was so immense, that he has been highly acclaimed by reputable sources like Rolling Stone, Metallica, Sex Pistols, NPR, and many more.

If you would like to experience some of his music, here is a link to Rolling Stone’s list of 20 essential songs by him!

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/20-essential-lou-reed-tracks-20131027

Comment below if you liked his songs!

Link to article: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/14/arts/music/lou-reeds-new-york-was-hell-or-heaven.html

Redefining the Console

There was a time when a console was just a console. But today it is a new generation of gaming. The much anticipated Xbox One and PlayStation 4 are coming out and have redefined the meaning of console yet again. Old consoles like NES and Atari were made to enjoy playing video games, and that was it. From there gaming console evolved to play DVDs, a huge innovation at the time. I remember being thrilled to watch movies on my PlayStation 2 since I did not have a DVD player. Later with the now aging Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, came computer browsing and video streaming. The general trend of consoles was becoming a multipurpose tool.

In my opinion, this change came about mainly due to lack of viable customers for pure gaming consoles. While there are a lot of gamers, they are not included with the “average” consumer. There needs to be some incentive the regular customer to buy it. A console that streams video, has internet, and can play movies alongside gaming appeals a lot more to someone like parents or other older adults. This way the benefits multiple people in a household and has more value. The Article talked about the competition in the gaming market, which is also an important factor. Devices like iPhones, iPads, have entered the gaming market, which puts pressure on gaming consoles to have more features.

I think this change in gaming consoles is a great trend. The Xbox One’s new cable TV support sounds promising. Being able to control with your voices is a great innovation, one that shows how far the Microsoft has gone in voice recognition. The PlayStation 4’s new “share” button is also a welcome improvement. It really conveys the feeling that gaming is no longer something you do alone in the dark in the basement of your mom’s house. It is something that is hared globally with others and will improve as people collaborate.

Link to the article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/15/arts/video-games/sizing-up-the-playstation-4-and-xbox-one.html?pagewanted=1&ref=arts

The Era of Consoles

LINK TO ARTICLE

It’s 2013. The first NES (Nintendo Entertainment System) was released in 1985. Playstation was released in 1994, and the first XBox was released in 2001. Not the first consoles by far, these three consoles represented a development into the new generation of video game consoles. These systems made video game consoles more common on a retail and consumer level, and more accessible to the public at large.

Many people would argue that video games are not art by any standards. Although inside the scope of this classroom, as we’ve seen with past articles, the general consensus is that anything can be art, and by extension video games. But in the outside world, many forms of non-traditional art can be seen as just that: non-art.

This article discusses the place of the consoles in this modern era of smartphones, and smart computers, and smart tablets, and smart watches, and smart gadgets. The writers start with a bold statement: “THE video game console is dead.” It’s almost as if they are announcing it to the world. Such a blunt and powerful statement for a geek at heart whose early forms of artistic and literary expression were through video games, on the medium of video game consoles. It hurts…

The writers argue that video games consoles can no longer exist as simply video game consoles. They are competing in an ever growing market of games. The next generation of video game consoles, Playstation 4 and the Xbox One, are competing to be entertainment systems. It’s ironic that the Playstation 2 once posed a threat to the computer entertainment system, but today, it’s the advent of personal computers and personal mini-computers in our pockets (smartphones) that threaten these new generations of consoles.

My question to you is: what does the demise of the video game console era propose for video games? Personally, I see a distinction between the games I’ve played on video game consoles and a game of Temple Run or Angry Birds. Some of my earliest literary and artistic pursuits (of course were books) but after that were in fact video games. Games like Metal Gear Solid, Kingdom Hearts, and Final Fantasy had complex and well written plots that required critical thinking and analysis skills to play and comprehend. In an essay I read for English class titled “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff, he argues that mainstream academia has often dismissed and smothered practices and pursuits viewed as anti-intellectual. One of my favorite games, Metal Gear Solid provoked strong ideas about different social, political, and economic themes including but not limited to warfare, technology, genetic engineering, religion, peace, race, engineering, history, weapons, life and death. Below is a brief trailer to one of the games. Notice how it seems to be telling more of a story rather than mindless entertainment (which can also be considered art :] )

Source:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/15/arts/video-games/sizing-up-the-playstation-4-and-xbox-one.html?pagewanted=1&ref=arts&_r=0
Hidden Intellectualism if you are interested

Art Is Hard to See Through the Clutter of Dollar Signs

As I have stated in my comments lately, people may be buying art for all the wrong reasons, such as prestige and to flash their deep pockets. Coincidently, as I was searching for an article in Today’s New York Times, I found one displaying exactly that. The article states that people with extreme wealth such as hedge fund owners and business moguls are attending auctions solely for sport, and are paying over the top prices for historic pieces strictly because they can.

The article speaks particularly about a piece by Francis Bacon called “Three Studies Of Lucian Freud”, that recently sold for 142 million dollars! That amount of money on a single piece of art is unimaginable, but it is happening. That sale was a new single sale record, but two records were broken that day. The auction house also broke the record for most money brought in at a single auction. That figure was 692 million dollars. Do these people really appreciate the art for its intrinsic value, or do they just want to show off? I believe it is the latter, and it must be heartbreaking for people who truly appreciate art for what it really is.

14BACON1-articleLarge(“Three Studies of Lucian Freud”)

These auction are getting absurd and out-of-control. I guess people really feel the need to impress others in the auction house and around the world because they have the means to do so. However they don’t realize what they are doing to the art world! They are turning it into a game of flaunting wealth, and that is what is so disappointing!

Let’s go back to that figure of $142 million. The article states that that figure would’ve paid for the renovation of the Queens Museum more than twice, but I want to look at it in terms of people. The average income per capita in 2012 was $42,693. That means it would take the average American 3326 years to make that amount of money! These super wealthy people feel the need to spend that amount of money in one day, and then go throw the piece of art in a vault somewhere? I absolutely dislike the thought of that.

Granted the historic piece is worth a ton of money, but it has more intrinsic value. However due to the purchase of the piece for 142 million dollars, people will not see it in that way anymore. Now the piece will be looked at in terms of money, and not as an beautiful piece of art that an artist spent many hours making. In my opinion this huge price devalues the true worth of the piece. My question to you is, do you agree that this may be getting way out of hand?

If you would like to check out the article, here is the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/14/arts/design/art-is-hard-to-see-through-the-clutter-of-dollar-signs.html?_r=0

Creative Project #3 Animation

finished project2

My animation reflects the elements of female loss of innocence, death, and fear in Nosferatu. The bright yellow daffodils represent purity, not only of Lucy in Nosferatu the play, but also in Nina in the original film. Neither Nina nor Lucy intended on having their blood sucked by a vampire. Lucy also did not deserve to have those men touch her body the way they did in the play. I do not believe that Nina and Lucy deserved this obviously, therefore the bright yellow daffodils wilting to a gray blur are meant to symbolize the female loss of innocence.

Technically, the girls are dead after having their blood sucked by the vampire, which is why I included the red images of the tombstones which also hint into the image of blood. The duplication of the tombstones show that this is not an event that will stand alone and that there will be more death to come. Eventually, all that was left was death. The repetitive ending of the word “caution” is meant to warn all of the other people involved because they could be the next victims of the vampire. The caution sign is a classic symbol of danger and fear, which is exactly what Nosferatu stands for.

project0013

The middle of my collage is the frame above because it represents the full loss of female innocence. The flowers are no longer yellow, they are no longer even visible, and the sense of identity is now changed. This deconstruction of female innocence in Nosferatu emphasizes the “death” of Lucy and Nina and the fear for what is to come which is the idea I portray in my animation.

Creative Project #3: Animation

IDC-collage-gif in google chrome

(Click on the image to see the gif)

Middle image:

collagemiddle

My themes for this collage were death, shadows, and life. I started out by editing the background image, which represents death. I desaturated it a bit to make it look more grim but made the sky bluer to show that there was a chance of “life” to defeat the “death.” Then the things that start appearing are shadows. They cover and darken most of the image to show that shadows have taken over any of the life from the “death” part, and adds to the grimness of death. However, since the shadows do not completely cover the image up, that lets the possibility of light or life to come through and defeat the darkness. The light keeps piling on in order to cover up the darkness. The middle picture is the finished collage which shows life permeating through death and being able to cover up the darkness.

My version of destruction was covering up all the light. Like the shadows, the light didn’t completely cover up all the shadows, but merely hid the shadows a bit. Therefore, the shadows come back but this time, they are opaque and cover up all the light and any life. At the end, the image is completely black which leaves no room for any life to defeat death. This shows that darkness prevails over light and death will always beat life, or at least in this collage.

Creative Project #3: Animation

AnimationforIDCAs an opener, I’d like to say that deconstructing the piece felt much better than putting it together. The three images I used in this animation symbolized the themes of life, desire, and death. The sun peeking over the horizon represented life to me, as the outward expansion of the colors felt like a blooming or growth. The fence was actually cut from a photo I took from the other side of a graveyard at night (Washington Cemetery in Brooklyn, if you’re interested), so it represents death. The slow obscuring of the sunlight by the fence was intentional.

The ocean spray that is slowly expanded and laid over the image of life obscured by death represents the desire to be free from the bars and taste the wonders of nature and life once more. The desire fades first, leaving a broken dream, so all seems lost, but then the fences become corrupted and fade away, leaving only the remnants of life that fade away as well, symbolizing the “final death.”

The piece:

middle image27