Upside Down

A unique type of museum viewing experience can be seen at the “Carsten Höller: Experience.” It involves the guests wearing goggles that flip their vision upside down. Karen Rosenberg talks about her experience at the museum in Where Visitors Take the Plunge, or Plunges. The weird thing is, you need to sign a waiver before going in.

She gives a slight background on the artist. She explains that there are certain requirements for the exhibit. You have to be a certain size and cannot have heart problems. She says her experience was quite unsettling not being used to seeing the forms of at that way. She begins to climb up the floors and even enters a spa like exhibit filled with Epson salt. The final exhibit was a slide down to the first floor. At first Rosenberg didn’t want to go on it. However, she was a reviewer and how could she review and art piece without experiencing it? She says that the exhibit was quite interesting and it provides an experience that some people look for.

I think this type of art is extremely fascinating. The thought of wearing the upside down goggles makes me think of all the crazy possibilities the museum can offer. The great thing about this is how art is changing in a different way. Nobody in the past would have thought of slides and a pool of water being considered art. However, I feel that these new kinds of art really defines what art is. Art is something that anybody can appreciate and this kind of art, especially ones where you can interact with, definitely take the pedestal for me. I would love to be able to interact with such modern types of art.

Sims Social

Most teenagers in the United States who are on Facebook (which is mostly all) have either played or heard of the game FarmVille. Though I have never played it, I have heard that it is an incredibly addicting game which when started, is impossible to stop. This is one of the connections made in the article, A Game to Make Zynga Nervous by Seth Schiesel.

The article is about the new Facebook game, Sims Social, which is becoming perilous competition for the maker of FarmVille, Zynga. Schiesel explains that it is much like all the other Sims games in which you make your own character and control his/her actions and the world around them. The social aspect of the game is that fact that it is on Facebook and as a substitute for spending money, you can ask your friends to for example, give you a wrench to build a table.

The article is a general description of the game but what I found intriguing was the amount of connections that Schiesel was making to different games, shows, and other art mediums. For example, in the beginning he explained that over the last month about 65 million people have played Sims Social, which is more than double the audience that watched the new season of “Two and a Half Men”, roughly twice the number of copies of “The Catcher in the Rye” sold during the last 60 years and other comparisons. Later in the article he even makes a connection to one of the Nintendo Mario games.

I have been noticing a ton of connections in the recent articles and once I noticed them, they have been coming up everywhere. Essentially all these connections are made to further make the reader interested in the article. I, for one, loved the show “Two and a Half Men” while Charlie Sheen was on it and I tuned in for the new episode to see what direction the show would take. Now I feel part of the article because I was one of the 30 million people who watched the first episode. I feel like these connections are made by the authors to draw their audience and eventually leads to the reader clicking links and following more articles.

Comparison of Opera to Play

Although both the Opera and the Play have the same plot, the two pieces focus on different characters. While the characters in the Play are all accessories to the main character, The Count of Almaviva, the Opera focuses mainly on Figaro the barber. Figaro is a very important piece of the opera and brings everything and everyone together and his significance is displayed when he sings in constant repetition of his name (which may represent the voices of the people calling his name and his importance to the people”.The Opera, of course, was a lot more musical – everything was singing and the mood is even more comedic and light hearted. Another difference was the ending of the two pieces. The Opera provided a more overall happy ending for all characters compared to the play which left Bartolo with a somewhat unhappy ending.

The Effect of the Opera

The play of The Barber of Seville illustrates the struggle of the Count when he was trying to get Rosine to fall for him in different personas with the help of Figaro. Dr. Bartholo attempts to stop him an every turn but the lovers inescapable love drives them to marry in the end. The opera generally follows an incredibly similar plot to that of the play but there were some changes that I noticed. First, just like any opera, most of the dialogue is in a singing manner, which brings up emotions less through the actions of the actors but through their voice. Second some of the scenes were slightly altered. In the play, the Count bribed the lawyer for him to sign the marriage paper to marry Rosine. However, in the opera, Count threatens the notary with a gun. This in turn adds even more drama and emotion to the opera. Another great difference was the role of Figaro. In the play Figaro acted as fate, driving the Count and Rosine to be together, much like in the opera. He was mostly just a side character that made things happen. However, in the opera, Figaro may be considered as the main character. The opera becomes more of a story of the struggles of Figaro attempting to help everyone around him.