Museum Websites

The website for the Metropolitan Museum of Art recently underwent a major overhaul. Edward Rothstein reviews the new site in his New York Times article “From Met Museum, Virtual Virtue.” Overall, Rothstein does a good job with his article. First, he describes the new site, which has a very simplistic design with black and gray banners and shows off the museum’s many collections. He continues his review with an analysis of this specific website as well as the role of websites for museums.

Rothstein points out the many things he likes about the new website and uses other websites as examples of his ideas. For example, he explains how the amount of information about the objects included on the site is just right, calling the site “encyclopedic.” He presents the websites for the Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg and the Louvre as examples of websites that didn’t do this quite as well as the Met did. Another aspect of the website for the Met that Rothstein liked was the way the website associates itself with the museum rather than competing with it. The simplistic design of the website doesn’t try to evoke sensations about the museum and the site includes interactive maps to direct people to the actual exhibits and objects in the museum building. Again, he provides an example of a website that is much weaker in this area, this time using the Museum of Modern Art’s site, which makes you feel “a sense of excitement and variety.”

The ideas that Rothstein proposes and the examples he uses help the reader to think about the role of a museum’s website. They make me wonder about how the websites impact the museums and their visitors. Is it better to see the objects in the museum in person or be able to look at images of them from anywhere? Does putting everything in the museum online make people less motivated to visit the physical museum building? How could this impact the experience? If less people decide to go to the museum because they can see it online, would this be good or bad for the experience of the people that do go to the museum? Is a less crowded museum better or is the social aspect in which people are responding to the objects in the museum together and seeing each others responses a part of the experience? I believe that putting more of a museum online will detract from the meuseum itself. However, I do think that the answers to many of these questions depend on the way the websites and museums are designed and how they work together. If they are designed to go together well, as Rothstein believes the Met and its website are, then people will look to both and there will be the impact could even be positive.

Short and Sweet?

Talk about avoiding the subject.  In Ken Jaworowski’s review “Stranger Ship, Stranger Cast,” barely talks bout the play he is reviewing, “Benito Cereno.” “Benito Cereno,” is “based on a novella by Herman Melville, and the play was first performed by Robert Lowell in 1964.” The play that is currently being performed has been directed by Woodie King Jr, but I didn’t find that out until later on in the review.  In fact, when I first read the review , Jaworowski said “Mr. King” and I thought he was mentioning Martin Luther King Jr.  I missed him mentioning that Woodie King Jr. directed the current production.

I then realized that part of that fault resided in me, but Jaworowski was also to blame.  His review described the play and praised Robert Lowell’s version of it, but when it came time to evaluate Mr. King’s version his effort was as lackluster as he described the play to be.  He only dedicates four sentences to his review of the piece and goes on to give credit to Mr. King for attempting  to resurrect the composition.  This need to award condolence to Mr. King demonstrates the high standards Jaworowski holds for Lowell’s piece and how much King fails to measure up to it.  I felt as if he were being condescending when he did this because he implied Mr. King’s production wasn’t good enough to be on the same level of Lowell’s. 

Another act of degrading the act, aside from mentioning how neither the cast nor the props were properly chosen, was the length of his critique, which was four paragraphs.  I was surprised when I finished the review so quickly, because I’ve never read one so short before.  Jaworowski showed that he felt the play didn’t need his full attention and opinion because it was so bad.  Instead he wrote a few small paragraphs and called it a night.

While this play in running until October 16th at the Flea Theater, I doubt anybody will go based on this account since it was given little effort, as it views the play was given. 

Scrapbooks

To get started with your scrapbook, Jill has given you editing privileges to create your own page on the website. Yes, you are now masters of the site. We trust you. You are now full collaborators.

If you have a moment, set this up. Go to your dashboard and “add new page.” Use your name in the subject heading. This way, Jill can transfer your page to the menu later in the week. We decided to go with a page instead of eportfolios for the convenience and joint creative vision it allows–so that the pages express perspectives of our shared cultural journey. If you feel very strongly that you want to use the eportfolio or some type of advanced wizardry, you can always link to the page. Whatever your vision, we can find a way to realize it.

Once you have created your page put up your first entry on a cultural passport event: theatre, meet the artist, museum visit or such. It need not polished. Many start with a slideshow or visual diary. These set dates to get something up are merely to keep you on track. Be sure to show me proof of where you went. By the way if you are looking for something Halloweeny, check out Blood Manor. It is a haunted house/ interactive experience downtown on Varick Street. Tickets are $25 +service fee. It looks like they will be holding some student nights. This kind of immersive tour is one of the hottest cultural trends happening globally.

Picking up Your Loaner Video Camera from MHC

As we discussed in class last week, each of you is responsible for going up to MHC over the next few weeks to pick up your loaner video camera.  You will need this equipment to complete your projects this semester.

In order to get your video camera, each student will need to schedule an appointment with Mary Carney, MHC’s Laptoop Coordinator and A/V Custodian, in advance.  Students can come in groups, but you should not just drop by unannounced.

Mary will be available on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays from 11am until 6:30pm, and on Sundays from 3 to 7:30pm.  Make sure to contact her ahead of time to set up an appointment to get your camera.

It is MHC policy that if you do not return your camera before the end of the semester, you will not pass your Seminar 1 course (you will sign paperwork and get all the necessary information when you meet with Mary to check out your camera).  These cameras are on loan from MHC, so you should make sure to take care of them and then return them in a timely fashion.

In the stars…

Destiny is the notion that certain parts of our lives are predetermined and no matter how much we will it to be different, it will not change. Greek culture and literature puts a large deal of importance on the idea of destiny. Sophocles’ tragedies of Oedipus Rex and Antigone are perfect examples of characters that fight the uphill battle against their destinies. In Oedipus Rex, a shaman foresees that Oedipus will kill his father and have sex with his mother. Out of fear that this will come true, Oedipus’ parents exile him and due to this he runs into them later on in life as a stranger and fulfills the prophecy. Oedipus’ parents attempted to change their fate and the fate of their son but in doing so put in motion events that led to their destiny unfolding.

In Antigone, two brothers named Eteocles and Polyneices fight for the throne and both die in the process. Creon, ruler of Thebes, orders Eteocles to be buried and Polyneices to be left to rot. Polyneices’ sister, Antigone, defies Creon’s orders and buries Polyneices. Creon buries Anigone alive in a cave but his son Haemon begs him not to. The prophet Tiresias comes and says that if Creon doesn’t release Antigone, he will lose a son. While Creon decides what he should do he finds out that Antigone, Haemon, and his wife Eurydice have killed themselves.

The idea of fate in a tragedy is to tell the reader what horrible thing is going to happen at the end of the story. The importance of this is to see how the characters use this knowledge and in most cases the characters misuse it or panic. Certain things are written and certain things can be changed by will but the tragedy of man is that he does not want to accept that certain things are out of his control.

Antigone Art Talk

People in ancient Greece heavily believed in fate. They believed that a person had their destiny laid out before they were born and nothing would change it. Sophocles, a playwright, used the theme of fate in his plays. One play in which fate is evident is Antigone, in which Creon suffers a terrible tragedy that he tried to avoid.

In the play Antigone, Creon orders that Antigone’s brother Polyneices’ dead body be left on the battle field and not buried. Antigone pleads with Creon to bury him and when Creon refuses, Antigone decides to bury Polyneices her self. When Creon learns of this, he sends Antigone to be buried alive and gets into a fight with his son.

After Creon orders the punishment on Antigone, Teiresias, a prophet, gives Creon a dire warning. Teiresias tells Creon that if he does not bury Polyneices and forgive Antigone then Creon “will not see the sun race through its cycle many times before you lose a child of your own loins, a corpse in payment for these corpses.” Creon quickly realizes that he has to listen to the God’s so he decides to bury Polyneices and forgive Antigone but he finds out it is too late; Antigone had killed herself and when Creon’s son saw her dead body, he killed himself as well. Later Creon’s wife killed herself because of the death of her son and cursed Creon right before she died.

Fate is clearly seen in this tragedy. Once Creon decided on a punishment, the Gods decided on a punishment for Creon. Even though Creon tried to fix his mistake, the God’s still followed through with their plan for Creon. Sophocles wanted to teach people that it is impossible to escape fate. Sophocles wanted people to have a catharsis of fear after reading his plays, something they definitely had after reading about the tragedies caused by fate.

Blurring the Line Between Food and Talk

In her New York Times article, Daytime’s Talking Heads Are Now Eating Too, Alessandra Stanley reviews the new daytime talk-show “The Chew.” It is a new food related talk-show that premiered on ABC. The show features world renowned chef Mario Batalli, vegetarian author Daphne Oz, Top Chef winner Carla Hall, Food Network Star winner Michael Symon, and co-host of What Not To Wear Clinton Kelly. The show’s interesting dynamic comes from the unique personalities of the hosts and the styles that they bring to the show. The Chew takes its name from the wildly popular talk-show The View to show viewers that it will be just as upbeat and lively but on the topic of food. During the show one of the hosts will prepare a dish and discuss it with the others. This brings a much needed and refreshing change to the static shows where the chef talks to the camera.

Stanley does a great job reviewing the show. She discusses the premise of the show and gives descriptions of all of the hosts. She also brings in other shows to give examples of what to expect. She adds quotes from the host’s playful banter to give the reader a sense of what the mood of the show is like. At some times her examples may stray a little too far away from the topic but it doesn’t take away from the rest of the article. I found her review nicely written and interesting and I might just tune in to The Chew one of these days.

Oedipus Rex and Antigone

Throughout the history of the world, divine intervention has been a prevalent matter.  Specifically, many Greek pieces of art and literature the idea of fate is intrinsic.   Socrates’ trilogy of Theban plays is a prime example of these ideals.  In this trilogy there are the Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, and Antigone.

Before the story of Antigone, there was Oedipus Rex.  Oedipus Rex epitomizes the concept of fate.  From his early birth it was foretold that he would kill his father and marry his mother.  Then he would be the father of his siblings.  Since fate was no laughing matter to the Greeks, Oedipus’s parents decided to kill him to prevent those occasions from ever happening.  Little did they know that Oedipus did not die, and instead his destiny began to unfold.   Unknowingly following the commands of fate, Oedipus kills his father at a crossroad.  He then continues along this predetermined path and marries his mother.  From a baby these events were foretold to happen, and they were unintentionally carried out by Oedipus.  In this respect the Greeks believe, fate is determined from the day one is born and there is no way of stopping it. Oedipus’s parents tried to end his life and his life’s purpose along with it, but they couldn’t stop the doom he was foretold to bring upon himself and them.  In this sense, the Greeks believed that man could not unbend the chains of fate and change the course of life.

            However, Antigone presents a different argument to this idea.  The first implication is the word anti in her name.  Her name suggests that she opposes a belief of the Greeks.  Contrary to the belief that there is a predetermined path for every person, Antigone takes actions into her own hands.  She chooses to go against Creon and bury her traitorous brother.  Enforcing her stance on individuality is the fact that she takes her own life.  She refuses to experience a judgment by another that should’ve been decided by her deeds.  Hanging herself proved that she defied the verdict on her life and she is the sole controller of her life.

            The Greek way of life was centered on fate.  When a person was born he was given a purpose for living and that force would push him through his existence.  However, the Greeks believed in the action of choice, but as an “anti” ideal of their people.  The idea of choice gives light to our individuality, which contrasts with the idea that the gods gave us our life to carry out certain deeds.  If the gods gave us purpose then the beings of our existence isn’t ours.

           

Fate

In plays and in real life people believe in fate. They believe that their life and choices are predetermined and nothing can change them. In Antigone, Antigone believes that her fate is a bad one. She thinks that since she was born due to an incestuous marriage between King Oedipus of Thebes and his mother Jocasta she will forever be cursed. Antigone goes against direct order from the kings and buries her brothers body and when summoned to explain why she did so Antigone says that natural law is above the law of the king. When Antigone mentions natural law she is talking about something similar to fate something that is out of control of mortals and will always be present. In the end Antigone makes her fate a self profiling prophecy by committing suicide when the king was going to let her go free. 

Inevitability of Fate as an Element of Tragedy

From Shakespeare’s Hamlet to ancient Greek myths, fate is an inherent, and even necessary, element in tragedy. Fate is recognized to be omnipresent and omnipotent in tragedy. The free will of the characters, whether exercised or not, is overpowered by their preordained fates. Hence, a tragedy occurs when despite a character’s brave efforts and noble intentions, he/she faces death simply because they are destined to die.

This is what happens to the protagonist Antigone in Sephocles’ play Antigone. The daughter of the ill-fated Oedipus and the sister of Polyneices and Eteocles, who also died tragic deaths, Antigone is a character that rouses the audience’s sympathy. When her uncle, King Creon issues a royal edict banning anyone from giving the disgraced Polyneices a proper burial, Antigone makes the choice that dooms her life. She is forced to defy the King’s orders because of her principles and firm conviction in the laws of Heaven which dictated that the dead must be given proper funeral rites if they are to enter the world below successfully. This choice may have been of Antigone’s own will but as later events prove, she was destined to meet a tragic end and the noble principles that led her to make this choice will not save her from her fate. Even as she explains her decision to her sister Ismene, Antigone acknowledges her impending death in a fatalistic manner as she has already accepted the power of fate.

When the blind prophet, Teiresias, warns Creon that condemning Antigone to death would seal his own fate, the King agrees to free Antigone and allow Polyneices’ burial. In another example of how fate is generally accepted by the characters as inescapable, King Creon is fearful that the prophet will prove right and that his own fate would be to die if he does not pardon Antigone. However, fate strikes again as Antigone is discovered to have taken her own life in prison.

Thus, Antigone, whose downfall makes the story a tragedy, meets her tragic end regardless of her noble character and brave choices. The dismal ending to the story is preordained and inescapable. The sense of inevitability that overshadows all the action makes the story all the more tragic. The play concludes with a final acknowledgement of the power of fate which comes from King Creon himself as he laments, “ Everything I touch goes wrong, and on my head/ fate climbs up with its overwhelming load” (1489-90)