Category Archives: Weekly Writing

Looking at Art

In the text, Looking At Art by Alice Elizabeth Chase, the author exposes changes in artistic style over various cultures and through different periods of human history. She outlines contrasting ideas and methods to the artistic approach. At first, exploring views and scenery, and initially observing the contrasts in the representation of wide and boundless landscapes. She points out, an artist, “…must do something with the landscape to express his ideas about it. Perhaps… [the artist] will select and emphasize.” (p. 19). Chase observes that scenic art is not entirely about the appearance of view, but that the image accentuates mans’ inflections of the view.

Chase observes a general trend, that art gradually becomes more focused on landscape. She even identifies a methodology for landscapes as they increase in popularity, claiming “artists established a formula by which they could turn the out quickly without bothering to study actual effects of light and air.” (p. 26). The formula is done with alternating areas of light and dark, in effect to carry the eye to the distant horizon. Consequently the works of Europe throughout the eighteenth century were teeming with such scenes. By contrast, at the same point in America, most western settlers were in such vast and open territories, they did not especially want to see more of the outdoors. In the next century, development had increased, “… and the new patriotism and enthusiasm for America showed itself in an interest in the countryside.” (p. 29). The West had been thoroughly romanticized and Eastern urbanites took delight in the wide expanses of nature.

The painting cannot merely be a record of what man sees, it portrays and expresses mans’ internal reference frame. In Chapter 4, ‘The Artist Looks at People and Space’, Chase contrasts the approaches of photography and painting. Referring to the spacing of objects not-to-scale, “Representing things in this way may not be true to what the eye sees, but if often shows what is going on better than a photograph could.” (p. 35). A photograph cannot always display a long range of scenery, and yet still maintain the intimacy of its subjects. Expressing ‘what is going on’ led to the technique of vanishing point perspective. This enabled artists to present a scene over a long-ranged distance by identifying where they wanted the light to vanish out from the point of view. Eventually, experiments with more than one vanishing point came to fruition; while other graphical perspectives implemented in non-Western cultures portrayed other ‘ways of seeing’.

As stated by Chase, “Vanishing-point perspective is what we are used to, is truer to what the eye sees, but there are things that can be shown more truly by another system.” (p. 53). She means that all ways of seeing have their own focus and are therefore uniquely purposed. Architects in the West implemented the Oriental isometric perspective to expose more of a building’s interior and exterior structures. This is just one example of how an artistic methodology can be reworked beyond its original purpose. New and inspiring uses for well-established artistic techniques are what spurs progress for such art forms, and thus more effective ways of conveying the human expression.

-Fred Erlikh

Mozart Summary

Nicholas Fuchs                                                                                                       9-16-14

Professor Graff                                                                                                  Arts of NYC

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is one of the most renowned musical artists of all time. His ability to bring out different emotions in his listeners using inspiration from anything that interested him is a testimony to his success. This brings to question the impact of his personal life on his music. Hans Mersmann communicates the loving and humble nature of Mozart through the collection of letters from Mozart to his closest relatives and friends.

In Mozart’s letters to his wife, he demonstrates his loving nature towards his family. Mozart often wrote in French which at the time was a norm used by lovers to attract their beloved one. In French, he refers to his wife using phrases such as “my beloved little wife” and sends her “kisses” through his writing. These expressive details he uses exemplifies how much he cared for his spouse. He shows an attachment to her that can only be described as true love. It is obvious that he wants her to write back as soon as possible based upon his description of how much he loves her. Mozart writes, “A million tenderest kisses to thee” and “I shall forever be your loving husband” (Mersmann, 242). This shows how much he cares for his wife and how attached he is to his spouse. In addition to the care he shows or his wife, he always asks how their son is doing and is curious about their well-being. This demonstrates that family; above everything else was his priority.

In Mozart’s letters to his friends, he defines his own modesty through his tendencies to feel reluctant to ask them for financial help. As a musician, Mozart had found a lot of difficulty making enough money to support himself. This served as both inspiration to write more music and inspiration for his music. Because he not wealthy, this developed Mozart into the humble character he is described as. In a letter to his friend Michael Puchberg, he describes how royalty had asked him to compose music for them without any financial support to produce it. Who was going to pay the band, develop the music, and buy the instruments. All these costs to produce the music were Mozart’s responsibility. Mozart could not support himself and felt bad asking for money from his friend. He thanked his friend Puchberg for all the financial support that he has given him.

In addition, Mozart humble character is shown through the way he writes his letters. He begins with an intriguing beginning that asks about the well-being of whoever he is writing to. He then goes on to complete his purpose and state why is he writing the letter. Then he ends his letter and signs it with phrases that show his humbleness. Examples include, “Ever your most indebted servant, true friend and brother” and “Your most humble servant.” Servant has a connotation that describes how he is “under” the person he is writing to.

Mozart’s writing style and attachment to his wife demonstrates his modest and loving nature. Mersmann shows the true nature of Mozart through his letters. He refers to his wife as “the beloved little one” and refers to himself as a “servant” to end all of his letters. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is the one of the greatest musicians of all time with a loving respect for his family and a humble attitude for his friends.

Mozart: A Humble Family Man (by Karan Chachlani)

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was one of the most prominent musical figures of the Classical era. His music brought great fame and fortune to his name, thus making him an idol for musicians everywhere even today. However, those extravagant concertos and operas that he constructed don’t reveal much details about his personal life. Therefore, Hans Mersmann’s collection of letters written by Mozart to his wife, friends, and other acquaintances helps us understand Mozart’s life by telling us a great deal about Mozart’s character. By examining these letters, we learn that Mozart was a humble man who had an immense amount of love for his family.

First off, Mozart’s letters to his friends, including his “best of friends” Michael Puchberg, demonstrate the immense amount of humility that he had. Mozart expresses in his letters that he faced countless difficulties in making money to just meet his day-to-day expenses. As a result, he had to resort to asking his loved ones for financial help. In a letter to his best friend Puchberg, Mozart explains how he gets orders to compose music by members of royalty, all on his own charge, which is why he is forced to come up with some way to make money. He writes in Letter #118 to Puchberg, “O God! here I am with fresh entreaties instead of with thanks!- with new demands instead of with payments! If you know me thoroughly, you must feel how all this torments me!” (243). The fact that it “torments” Mozart to plead for money from his dear friends tell us how humble he is. He is ashamed that he can’t earn to sustain himself. He wishes that he had thanks to give to his friends for already helping him in countless other situations, instead of continuously annoying them with more “entreaties” for money.

In addition, Mozart’s humility is accentuated by the way he ends certain letters. For instance, before signing his name at the end of the aforementioned letter to Puchberg, Mozart writes, “Ever your most indebted servant, true friend and brother” (244). Similarly, in Letter #127 to Puchberg, Mozart signs, “Your true friend, servant, and brother” (250). In Letter #131 to the Municipal Council of Vienna, Mozart signs, “Your most humble servant” (254). The usage of “servant” exemplifies Mozart’s submissive yet modest attitude towards others. Also, the fact that he still signs as “servant” to those who didn’t even give him compensation for his musical creations tells us that he considered his acquaintances as equals and always demonstrated his respect everyone around him.

Furthermore, another aspect of Mozart’s character that is revealed to us through his letters is his caring and loving nature. Mozart’s letters to his wife demonstrate the love he has for her. In almost all these letters, he calls her his “beloved little wife!” In several letters, Mozart writes exquisitely in French, as a romantic lover would do to court his maiden. Lastly, in many of these letters, Mozart gives “kisses” to his wife through words. For instance, Mozart ends Letter #116 by writing, “A million tenderest kisses to thee. I am ever thy tenderly loving husband” (242). After this signature, he adds a post scriptum, enquiring about their son Karl and his well-being. Through these letters, we see that for Mozart, family is priority. The way he yearns for his wife to write back to him shows us how enormous of an attachment he has with her and how he needs her presence to survive being away from his family. Despite being a long distance from them, he still cares for what goes in his household.

In fact, Mozart’s love for his wife and children is so strong that it is the force that drives him to acquire financial success. He writes in Letter #128 to his wife, “I long for news of you, of your health, our affairs, etc. I am firmly resolved to make all the money I can here and then return to you rejoicing. What a fine life we shall then! I will work – work so hard – so that no unforeseen accident shall ever reduce us to such desperate straits” (251). Mozart desires for him and his family to live without experiencing any hardships, which is why he tries so diligently and with great effort to earn money. In fact, this might add to the shame that he feels when asking his friends for financial help. His ambition is to use his musical skills to acquire enough wealth to support his family, but he can’t do that because his profession doesn’t give him this luxury. He hates that in order to gain money for his family, he has to turn to others for help. This humility only serves to emphasize his love for his wife and children.

It is evident that while Mozart did suffer financially and had to resort to desperate measures that included borrowing money from his friends, he had the morality and goodness of character to feel humble about it. Mozart’s goal was to support his wife and children, proving that he was, first and foremost, a family man. I think it’d be appropriate to say that his love for family was one of the driving forces that inspired him to write such brilliant pieces of music that are still revered by people today.

Mozart’s Character

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart—baptized Joannes Chrysostomus Wolfgangus Theophilus Mozart—was born on January 27th, 1756. His father was the music composer Leopold Mozart, and his sister, Maria Anna, was also a musician. Mozart was a well-known composer and musician during his time. Although his talent was undeniable, he and his family suffered financially, especially during his last years. On the outside, he was the talented composer with “taste…and complete understanding of composition,” according to his friend and fellow composer, Haydn. His personal letters to family and friends highlight the unity between him and his wife, his relationship with close friends, his feelings of insecurity, his work ethic, and his disdain of composing simply to make money.

According to his collection of letters, Mozart had a small group of confidants. Clearly, he relied a lot on his teacher/father’s advice and support. He also worked closely with his wife to support their family. In one of the earlier letters, Mozart wrote to Herr Geheimrath and expressed his zealousness for German nationalism. He wrote that he would not speak so frankly if he wasn’t writing to a good friend. He also corresponded heavily with Michael Puchberg over borrowing some money because he knew Puchberg to be a true friend.  To the few close friends he had, he seemed to be able to speak with much frankness and honesty. As with his family, he could “be himself.” He even expressed some good-humored sarcasm in a letter to his friend, the Baron Gottfried; he was so amazed at receiving a letter from him, he almost threw “his cap over the roof.”

Mozart used his most romantic and flowery words when writing to his wife. He wrote her constantly while he was away and always missed her terribly. During their collected correspondence, both got dangerously ill. As his wife recovered at home, Mozart always begged her to take care of herself in his letters to her. He often said to “watch out for the chilly mornings” and “don’t spend too much time in the bath.” When he remembered the “good days”, he thought back of when he and his wife were together in Baden those early days. From his letters, I get the sense that he can share anything with his wife—their finances, their children, their memories. He even described some of his “jokes” to his wife; for example, he told her (in great detail and with much excitement) about playing an arpeggio during one of the musician’s performances, thus exposing him as a fake. It’s not a joke he would probably have shared with everyone, probably because it might not be funny to some.

Mozart was clearly unease when it came to having enough money at the end of the month to pay his debts; despite all his hard work, he often had to compose and perform simply to pay off his debts. Even if he had just enough money to pay everything off, the schedule-following, punctual man in himself was uneasy. This is what drove him to borrow so much from his good friend Puchberg. Above all, Mozart cherished honour and credit. He turned to his friend (the same friend) instead of the “money-lenders” because he saw his friends as “brothers”, as people he could really trust. He wrote intensively to Puchberg about how pathetic he felt asking for money and how he understood if Puchberg could only give what he could spare. Money clearly brought out the worst in him. He began some letters to the King for a position and composed many quartets and clavier sonatas to sell for money. He was definitely a hard-working fellow (see his introductions in some of his letters where he apologizes for taking so long to answer because of work). He wrote in a letter that he was “much at others’ dispositions” out of necessity. It is clear that he was frustrated at how his life and work was dictated by his finances. However, the last years proved to be more fruitful for him in his home country [in the last letter from his wife to the Emperor, she states that Mozart could have been extremely successful financially if he had accept the job offers abroad].

-Amanda Puitiza

The Letters of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was an Austrian musician and composer of the 1700s, whose many operas, concertos, symphonies and sonatas made classical music what it is. As such a profound musician, he was a very proud individual and had great reason to be. In his set of letters written to several individuals in Letters of Mozart, it is clear to see that Mozart was excellent with words and was able to sweet-talk his way into getting what he needed. His diction indicates his excessive pride as he criticizes individuals through his words “…even if there are to be found among them people as good as, or even better than, those I have named (which I very much doubt), I cannot but feel that the directors of our theatre will prove to be too parsimonious, and too little patriotic…when they could get better singers on the spot…” (p. 228). As an individual held in high esteem, Mozart expectedly looks down on other performers and, in his letters, belittles them.

As the letters progress, it is revealed that Mozart had many financial problems, seeing as how he repeatedly asked to be commissioned and to borrow a great sum of money. On the other hand, he was able to skillfully use his words to convince friends to lend him the money he needed to continue composing and working as a musician. He also appeals to Sebastian Winter in order to try to obtain a position composing music for his Highness’s orchestra and request a yearly salary. Glaringly apparent is his ability to praise others when he is asking for favors. He phrases his requests in such a way that portrays excellence with words, as shown when he writes “I think I see in you a man, who, like myself, if it is in any way possible will certainly help his friend, if he be a true friend, his brother, if he be indeed a brother.” (p. 238). At this point, he is not only praising his friends but also using guilt, testing their loyalty and attempting to evoke sympathy. In a sense, Mozart was very clever to be able to successfully use just words when in need of something.

Mozart’s softer side is revealed through his letters to his wife, which are filled with sweet words and longing. In one letter, he writes “To-day is the sixth since I left you, and, by God, it seems a year…love me for ever as I love thee.” (241). His letters to his wife are the only ones that seem truly sincere and reveal a more caring side of him, as he ends each letter to his wife with the words “a million tenderest kisses to thee”. He clearly expresses his excitement in receiving letters from his wife and eagerly tells her about his work and his day, which is very different from the artificial manner in which he writes to others like Michael Puchberg and Franz Hofdemel. Mozart can also be seen as very kind and caring towards his family as he writes to his ill father “I hope, I wish, that while I write this you are getting better. But should you, against all expectation, be no better, I beg you will not…will not conceal it from me, but tell me, or have told me, the whole truth, so that I can come with all human speed to your arms!” (234). Clearly, he feels an obligation to take care of his father and sister, as well as his wife who he loves so dearly.

Overall, Mozart was a brilliant, clever musician and composer during the classical era but unfortunately suffered through many financial difficulties due to the fact that his music was not so greatly valued as it is today.

Mozart’s Character

It is no doubt that Mozart was one of the world’s greatest musical prodigies. As we flip through history books or culturally based texts, we are constantly reminded of how impressively talented Mozart was and how much fame his name continuously acquires. However, what we do not grasp at first glance is who Mozart was as a person – aside from being universally known as “musical genius.” To really understand Mozart as a human being we must analyze his relationships with other people, as well as the way in which his musical skills impacted his life. Fortunately for us, the collection of letters Mozart had written provides us with such insight.

The letters indicate two different sides to Mozart that correlate with the different ways in which music was of value to him. Much of the letters are of Mozart writing to various family members. Throughout each of these we see a side to Mozart that’s warm, kind, and endearing. He expresses enormous love for his wife, immense care for his sister, and deep concern for his father. He uses words like, “I kiss you a million times most tenderly, and am ever thine, true till death,” (240) when writing to his wife while oversees. He writes to his father who is facing a fatal illness, “I hope, I wish, that while I write this you are getting better… so that I can come with all human speed to your arms” (234). He then writes to his “dearest, best sister,” “As I have said and thought a thousand times, I would leave everything to you with true delight in doing so” (234). It is clear to any reader that Mozart truly values family, and in no way hides his strong sense of duty to those he loves.

However we must also examine the role music – as a profession – played in Mozart’s life, and how it affected his relationships with his family. For Mozart, music was not just a talent or an outlet of expression; music was his profession and thus what he relied on to support him and his family financially. To put it simply, music was his source of income. Therefore, while family was indeed a major concern to him, Mozart often times expresses the most emotion in reference to his work or money problems. For example, Mozart expresses to his “best of friends,” Michael Puchberg, “my circumstances are such that I must absolutely get money.” The tone of the letter begins to turn desperate when he pleads, “I am sorry enough to be in this situation, but that is the very reason why I want a fairly substantial sum for a fairly long period.” (238) Our perception of Mozart changes from that of calm, warm, happy, and easy to that of nervous and tense.

In spite of this, however, it does point out that Mozart has a way with his words. When he writing to his family he connects to them by revealing the innermost contents of his heart and allowing them to peak into his soul. When writing with financial regards his diction projects a sense of trust upon the recipients. When he asking to borrow money, due to his financial issues, he promises to his friend that he is “quite willing to pay interest,” and states, “and whoever lends to me is, I think, secure enough by reason of my character and salary.” Additionally, he writes, “I beg you to lend mea few hundred gulden…” (239) Furthermore, this idea is exemplified through the letter Mozart sends to the Prince, begging to “do business” with him. He formulates this elaborate proposition and glorifies himself, although ends his letter by claiming that this offer, “arises from genuine zeal to serve his Highness diligently.” (228) Again, he is portraying this sense of trust upon those he seeks to become financially involved with.

While this implies the different relationships Mozart had, as well as the different ways he viewed these relationships, we need to inquire more to fully understand how this all intertwines with the music aspect. We already know of Mozart’s incredible talent and passion for music, but can we see that in relation to his personal self through these letters? The answer is yes. Through subtle points in his diction, we can gain an understanding of how Mozart values his profession, in relation to the way he values his family. Firstly, let’s not forget that although he writes a beautifully heart felt letter to his wife, he is doing so because he chose to leave her for some time in order to attend to “business” (his musical profession) overseas. He put his financial duties over that of his family. Morever this idea is indicated through the usage of his diction in his letter to Michael Puchberg, where he admits, “i am too much at other people’s disposal and too little at my own.” (236) If we analyze this carefully we can begin to realize that Mozart is constantly apologizing in his letter for either taking a long time to respond, or for simply writing such a short message. For example, in one of the letters he writes to his wife, he signs it with the words, “you must not regulate the length of your letters by that of mine. Mine are short only because I am pressed with business, otherwise I would write whole sheets…” (242)

Thus we can conclude that while Mozart conveyed through the letters to his family and close friends that the thing he valued the most, was the well-being of those he loved, he also prioritized his profession in a way that came before and above all else. He writes with deep passion in reference to his family, however he does so because circumstances separated him from his family – circumstances due to his own decisions.

-Nicole Schneider

Chris Summary

Chapter 3 of Alice Elizabeth Chase’s Looking at Art begins by describing a view from a great height. When we observe scenery we realize that nearby objects are big and clear, their colors appear brighter. On the other hand, objects that are farther away seem smaller and blurrier. If you were to take photo with a camera it would register exactly how that image looks at that moment. However, an artist’s job is much more difficult for he/she cannot present everything in the vast expanse of their field of view. Therefore, they must learn to confine their view and project it onto a limited space. This means focusing on a smaller part of the whole to avoid the risk of making the painting too small. An artist’s job is not to merely replicate but to create his own image. They must not illustrate how a camera would see the view but how he/she sees the view. This involves accentuating certain aspects through the use of different shading, lighting, or artistic style. Rarely did artists portray a scene, as the naked eye would observe it. For example, ancient Egyptians had a “map-like” style in which they omitted details and focused more on the location of the objects. Setting was also a very important factor for some artists like the Greeks who preferred the use of trees and rock when painting people. However, the ancient Romans preferred a more gaudy setting. They didn’t really leave much to the imagination when they painted war heroes with banners in the cities they had conquered.

In Chapter 4, Chase depicts a photographer who is taking a photo of people in action. She describes the difficulty of the situation due to the imperfect nature of objects in motion from a single perspective. Often when you take a picture of multiple subjects in motion their bodies will overlap and the picture may appear cramped. You can try to stage it and plan everyone’s location but more often than not it will appear staged and awkward. Throughout history, artists have tried to develop techniques to combat this flaw and have had some success with it. For example, the ancient Egyptians did not really care much for depth and focused only on showing the entire body of the subjects. However, as time went on people sought more effective means of accurately portraying what they saw.

Looking at Art – Ryan Mellino

It’s all a matter of perspective. In Alice Chase’s book “Looking at Art”, she analyzes how artists of different time periods viewed their art. Specifically, in this essay discussion will center on two chapters, “The Artist Look at the View” and “The Artist Looks at People and Space. Chase uses many examples to illustrate her point, with the book being full of pictures of artwork. In this way the reader can more accurately see what the artist sees, and thus, the art.

In the third chapter of “Looking at Art”, entitled “The Artist Looks at the View”, Chase analyzes how different artists in different time periods tried to accurately illustrate and use landscapes. She starts by briefly outlining the challenges of drawing scenery, before delving into ancient Egyptian and Assyrian paintings. These peoples drew things in profile, with Chase stating that the scenes were “a kind of map”. Skipping past the Greeks, the Romans used fanciful, imagined landscapes to further whatever point they were trying to get across. Jumping to the East, the Chinese believed landscapes held great importance because they “suggested both the moods of man and the infinity of God”. The Chinese would use different types of brushstrokes to illustrate elements of the landscape in order to differentiate between them. The medieval period is not discussed in any detail, and as the Italian painters of the early Renaissance used landscape mainly as a setting for the main figures and story of the painting, the Dutch are the next culture illuminated. The Dutch and Flemish artists often put their stories off to the sides of their paintings, as in Pieter Bruegel’s “Death of Saul at the Battle of Gilboa”, where Saul and his son’s suicides are placed in the bottom-left of the page as the battle rages through the middle. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, drawing landscapes became more popular, and the Dutch once again were the main proponents. A certain style evolved, using “modification of tones” to draw what were often “brownish landscapes”. In the nineteenth century, it became vogue in Britain for “gentlemen to order paintings of their country estates”, and here more interesting and brighter colors began to be used. This translated across the ocean to America, where landscapes were often painting not only factually, but in a manner that would convey “bigness, distance, fertility”. As time wore on and painting grew more and more realistic, some artists such as van Gogh came to view art as a representation of the artists’ “thoughts and feelings”.

In the following chapter, entitled “The Artist Looks at People and Space”, Chase analyzes how artists throughout history have attempted to draw people and things in a more realistic perspective. Once again starting with the ancient Egyptians, Chase states that they “made the human figure into a sort of map”. This allowed the Egyptians to show what was happening, but not with any sort of realism. The Assyrians also drew people in profile, as did the Greeks, although “by the fifth century B.C. bodies had started being drawn to indicate the third dimension”. Italian paintings form the last centuries B.C. show a use of shadows for the first time, although there is evidence this was derived from earlier Greek works. Once again moving ahead to the Renaissance, the issues of perspective and foreshortening became important, as artists desired to draw in a more realistic manner. Through the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, artists rapidly improved their abilities, with “the ceiling of the Church of St. Ignazio” being an example of “superb technical skill”. Meanwhile, in the Far East, the Chinese and Japanese used an isometric perspective. This method has no vanishing point, and is used by “the Western world to show the structure of a building”. Chase concludes by stating that there is no right or wrong way to use perspectives, as different types are useful for different things.

Looking At Art – Arts in NYC

Arts in NYC – Steven Graff

Luis Feliciano

9/17/14

Looking at Art

Art is the expression of human ideas and imagination. The visual arts come in many different forms, such as sculptures or paintings. Looking for Art by Alice Elizabeth Chase tackles different situations that artists have faced since the origins of art. Over time they have crafted special techniques and forms to vividly recreate landscapes and people.

Chapter 3 is all about scenery – how artists illustrate backgrounds, foregrounds, and how they differ from one another. When one artist sees a view, they remember and paint it differently than other artists would do so. Different artists emphasize different parts of their world such as prioritizing which objects get brighter colors and their positions within the frame. This shows how everybody sees things differently. Ten people can look at the same scene, but remember it and depict in ten, very different ways.

For example, Egyptians first started off by painting literally what they saw. They focused on accurately drawing shapes of objects, almost seemingly drawing things in the form of maps. This method lacks the beauty found in nature. Things are essentially drawn as geometrical figures, but in nature things aren’t really found like that. Objects come in different shapes and sizes, with a wide assortment of colors. By the middle of the nineteenth century, artists began to use their eyes as photographers used cameras – merely to see. Artists realized that what they drew didn’t just have to be a representation of what they saw, but more of an expression of their own thoughts and feelings.

On the other hand, chapter 4 is all about portraying the human body and perspective. At first, artists did not take into account perspective. For this reason, many of their paintings represented humans in two dimensions. The Egyptians for example, wanted to create a method of drawing human bodies, which represented the face with a profile view, the shoulders with a front view, and the legs with a side view. Paintings in Italy from the second or first century B.C. were the first works of art to incorporate shadow. This gave the people in the paintings depth and added a sense of realism to the entire work.

With respect to perspective, artists had trouble painting what they saw, while also maintaining accuracy in their work. As a building vanishes into the distance, it appears smaller although in reality it is not smaller. Creativity was often sacrificed for accuracy. Soon people started to look for scientific reasoning. Here came the different forms of perspective. The two main forms of perspective are one-point and two-point perspective. One-point perspective involves putting a point, generally in the middle of the painting, and having everything in the painting fade away towards that one point. Two-point perspective is the same as one point perspective, but just using two different points. This added more realism, but even then people realized that this “vanishing” perspective method could sometimes appear unrealistic. The human eye does not look towards one, or even two points. It is constantly moving around looking at various things from all sorts of angles. Take a step forward, or backward, and things look even more different. This is what makes art so unique. There are no right or wrong ways to depict a scene; there are no right or wrong answers.

Chapter 3 + 4 “Looking at Art”

Looking at Art” by Anne Elizabeth Chase

 

Artistic perspective all over the world differs, and thus the styles used to portray the same subject are most likely going to be as different as their respective principles. Simply put, a cat drawn by an American will be different than the very same cat drawn by a German. For the chapters assigned, Chase compares and contrasts certain techniques and types of art globally.

 

Chapter 3:

In this particular chapter, Chase focuses on the cultural purposes of a landscape, throughout the world, and through the ages.

Some countries, such as the Greeks did not find much use for landscapes other than a setting for the subject; a landscape in Greek art was seldom a subject itself, if at all. Other cultures seemed to give landscapes a more important role. Conquering Romans and English heirs used landscapes as a way to show off their wealth. Meanwhile, the Chinese and the medieval folk saw landscapes as a connection from man to the divine.

 

Chase explores the methods used for the intents of the artist that will, for the most part, conform to the societal expectations at the time and place.

According to Chase, Pieter Bruegel’s view on landscape is that, “Man with his myriad activities was merely an incident in a great and beautiful world where his daily routine, his joys and griefs, were relatively unimportant.” (Chase 23, 25). Chase maintains, “Nowhere does Bruegel make one feel this more than in his “Death of Saul” (Figure 22). The armies of Israel are losing the battle to dense hordes of Philistines. Saul and his son and armor-bearer have fled to a cliff-top where, seeing defeat and capture inevitable, father and son have killed themselves. The tragedy is told by tiny figures in the foreground, not centered as one would expect, but far to the left. Beyond the struggle spreads a serene green valley through which a river winds towards a distant city.” (Chase 25).

This kind indepth analysis of Bruegel’s “Death of Saul” is something Chase makes consistently with other pieces of art referenced in this chapter, and as we would find it, in the following chapter.

 

 

 

Chapter 4:

In this chapter, Chase goes into the technique of perspective itself. Here, Chase makes the artist out to be an amateur photographer, in terms of having the right poses or the right angle or the right lighting all at once.

For a long time, artists have had a difficult time trying to replicate the real life perspective that they have, since they aren’t afforded the luxury of having the perfect subject. Some artists, especially those in the ancient times, did not really care much for accuracy of depth because they would rather paint as they know the object to be, not as it seems. But as time passed, more and more artists began to seek the scientific accuracy of perspective and depth.

Attaining the three dimensions we are accustomed to today was not an easy road. At first, the Greeks did foreshortening of some limbs correctly, but the final result was a bit awkward. Next, the Romans used shadows, with shading, to indicate depth.

Finally, we reach vanishing points. All lines must lead to the vanishing point. If there are multiple vanishing points, then only some lines lead to a single point, not necessarily all the points.

There have been some tricks with distortion that would also indicate depth.

Eastern art uses parallel lines instead of vanishing points, with a method called the Oriental isometric scheme. In the Western world, this is mainly used for architectural purposes, because it is easier to see the interior and exterior of buildings.