If I had to author an article in the NY Times or a comparable periodical on a scientific paper, I would pen it in such a way that it is appealing to the general audience while remaining scientifically sound. In order to accomplish this, I would include elements such as: images, charts or graphs that are explained in common terms, and quotes from the experimenters or experts in the field. The images would help illustrate the scientific topic at hand. For the case of my healthcare innovation article, the popular article had an image and video of nano-bots acting as a swarm, which helps the audience understand the innovation more. Popular media makes for a good representation for scientific research because it relates the scientific article to problems or applications that affect everyday people like medicine or cancer. I think authors should improve on adding more details about scientific article in terms of experimentation and results rather than just focusing on the abstract and introduction. In my research, I found the innovation of nanotechnology interesting because I only believed nano-bots to be part of Sci-Fi movies like “Big Hero Six.” So, to learn that scientists created nano-bots like what the villain Professor Robert Callaghan used in the movie sounded interesting to me. In addition, the fact that this innovation could be applied to helping fix blood clots or diseases seems innovative.