If I was the author of a New York Times article, reporting on a scientific matter, I would make sure that I conveyed the information accurately and in a way that will draw in the readers and keep them interested until the end. To do that, I would read any relevant information found in other journals or scientific articles until I had a comprehensive understanding of the topic I was writing about. No matter how passionate I was about the subject, I would  address any and all sides including any disagreements or  controversies. I noticed that the author of my popular report remained unbiased and completely objective when reporting about animal therapy. In addition, if I referenced another article or heard a scholar say something interesting, I would not only cite the information, but also put the complex data into simple words, so professionals and nonprofessionals can understand. Fascinating statistics have always been the most interesting parts of scientific articles for me and I believe they are not used enough.  If I was an author, I would fill my article with unbelievable numbers and data in big bold letters that would make it hard for the readers to stop reading.  While listening to my classmates, I noticed how well they conveyed the scientific information as if they were writing their own scientific reports. Everyone accurately and successfully simplified the information they read in the scientific journals, which was not easy to do, and still engaged their classmates like real authors.