Topicspostmodernism waste prevention solar energy demographics post-modernism time climate change right to the city climate change mitigation Sandy NYC politics complexity oyster beds rooftops environmental justice risk composting Italian futurism science waste-to-energy artificial intelligence energy architecture place wetlands law wasted food information technology carbon parks and nature transportation Mannahatta technology cooking physics recycling incineration timeline transhumanism (video) gaming virtual trees futurism modernism culture infrastructure business marsh parks biofuels waste management art farming climate change adaptation carbon sequestration cities water waterfront PlaNYC systems theory environmentalism risk-based approach planning housing global warming
Hi, all! I mentioned this last week in class, but please do bring your laptops with you tomorrow: we’ll be working on bringing together your earlier memos and extracting some take-aways for presentation at the Seminar 4 conference. Thanks!
Time of Field Trip Visit
11:30-1pm, April 30th. Be there by 11:15.
The nearest subway is the N/Q/7 Queensboro Plaza (about a 10 minute walk). The Court Square E/G/M stop is a bit more of a walk (about 20 minutes), but also in the area.
The compost site is located underneath the Queensboro Bridge near the intersection of Queens Plaza South and 10th Street (http://goo.gl/maps/zCdYA). From the subway, walk to Queens Plaza South and 10th street. There is a big entrance at that intersection. Once you enter, we are to the far right (east) area under the bridge. You will see leaf cages and compost rows.
You will be at a compost site: closed toed flat shoes and long pants are recommended.
Email me at Samantha.firstname.lastname@example.org or call/text 917-613-1789
As you know, I posted extensive guidance on the annotated bibliography some time ago. I did not, however, specify a minimum number of pages or entries. Why? Because you now should be at the point where you are thinking for yourselves about your research, gathering information in a meaningful way (not as filler or just to meet a requirement), and gearing up to write a strong final paper, which is now, for those of you who did not catch this in prior postings, a minimum of five (not seven) single spaced pages.
Like all of you, I, too was an undergraduate under a lot of pressure (back in the 1980’s), working part time. I still recall the research papers I wrote and the research skills I gathered writing those papers as some of the more important skills and knowledge sets that I gained in college. Approach your annotated bibliography and your final paper in the same spirit!
Let me know, as always, if you have specific questions.
to Reiterate: I am reducing the required number of Collaborative Learning Contributions from two to one. If you already have done two, you are to be commended! If you have already done one, you are done! If you have proposed one already, great.
If you have not yet proposed and presented a Contribution, you need to think about one (not two) NOW, propose it to me based on the calendar above/below, and follow through on the day you state. Please do not plan a Contribution on a day when we are practicing Presentations. So this leaves:
Class 9 – April 9th after digester tour (open air)
Class 10 – April 16 – Richard, Lawrence, Kelly (classroom) — is filled up, no more sign ups allowed
Class 12 – April 30 – at compost site – Jenny (open air)
Class 14 – May 14th, classroom, Jessica P., Edson, Steven
This is a follow up to the previous announcement posted at 1:35 on 4/5
Hi Again Everyone:
I have assigned you all to groups for presentation purposes. See matrix below and excel version attached for your group assignment. Here is hat to do next:
1.Email your fellow group members to find a mutually agreeable time to present at the Macaulay Conference, and come up with a title. Make sure the title is broad and general, since you all have not had a chance to discuss what your respective projects have in common in detail. You may want to select the group name I have assigned to your group, or another name.
2.The designated contact person should register with Macaulay at: eportfolios.macaulay.cuny.edu/seminar4/ as soon as everyone has agreed on a time. The designated contact person is the first person in the group by alphabetical order last name. They are bolded/talicized below.
3. Once this is done, sit back, relax, and don’t worry about next steps with regard to your group presentation until we all meet in the classroom on April 16th (some of you can’t come to the tour next week, I understand)
Do continue to work on your annotated bibliography. Everyone must submit their own final paper as planned. The only changes right now have to do with presentations.
4.On the 16th, I will discuss these developments with you in class. At the next class, April 23rd, you will have the entire class time to share your projects, discuss, and begin to formulate your group presentation. You will need to brainstorm about what you can all collectively say, based on your projects, that is compelling and relevant to the future of NYC.
5.The class after that (April 30th) will be another field trip. The class after that (May 7th) will be a practice presentation day in advance of the conference.
Let me know immediately if you have:
-Your designated contact person isn’t responsive
-For any reason at all!
|Name||Topic||Group||email – contact person is 1st person in group, bolded and italicized|
|RICHARD||Artificial Trees||Atmosphere, Air, Weather||RICHARD.CHAN2@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|AMANDA||Artificial Trees||Atmosphere, Air, Weather||AMANDA.HUANG@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|DEREK||NYC disasters and the adaptation of infrastructure||Atmosphere, Air, Weather||DEREK.KU@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|STEVEN||Soot Pollution and Government Mitigation||Atmosphere, Air, Weather||STEVEN.SKLYAREVSKIY@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|CHRISTOPHER||Subway Platform Barriers||Transportation||CHRISTOPHER.CHANG1@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|MEGAN||The Development of the Hybrid Car||Transportation||MEGAN.CHIU@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|EDSON||NYC Subway – Goals and Challenges for 21st Century||Transportation||EDSON.FLORES@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|LAWRENCE||Hybrid Vehicles in NYC||Transportation||LAWRENCE.KULISHEVSKY@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|RAYMOND||Public Transportation and Pollution Mitigation||Transportation||RAYMOND.WANG@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|HYE MIN||Green Roofs against Climate Change||Urban Farming and Composting||HYEMIN.LEE1@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|JESSICA||Urban Farming||Urban Farming and Composting||JESSICA.LIN1@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|JESSICA||Vertical Farming in NYC||Urban Farming and Composting||JESSICA.PICCOLINO@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|KELLY||Future of Composting in NYC||Urban Farming and Composting||KELLY.WU1@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|NARCISO||WTE in Sweden||Waste||NARCISO.CORREA@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|MICHELLE||Waste Management in NYC||Waste||MICHELLE.GUO@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|JAE-EUN||WTE in NYC policy||Waste||JAEEUN.LEE@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|YANA||Waste Management in NYC||Waste||YANA.MANEVICH@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
|SEAN||Waste Management in NYC||Waste||SEAN.PROCTOR@BARUCHMAIL.CUNY.EDU|
this is written at 1:35 on Friday, 4/5/13. Check your in-box for updates.
Much to my annoyance, I have found out that you have to present at the upcoming conference in groups, not as individuals. I did not know that, and I apologize for not knowing that. It was not made clear to me.
Fortunately, there is a lot of overlap among topics. In the next hour or so, I am going to assign you all to groups based on your topic. I will name one person to be the “sign up” person for the conference slot, so that this process is not delayed.
We will allot enough time in class for you all to work together on presentations, and then practice them. Do not worry about this. More details will be coming in the next email I send.
Thanks for your patience,
As you know, your next assignment is coming up – your annotated bibliography is due by 10:30 April 15th. Now that I have provided everyone feedback on their timelines, here is some guidance for the bibliography. Please take the time to read it, and to educate yourself in Chicago style citation if you need it. Many people failed to properly cite on their last assignment. I did not penalize the assignments for this, but I expect proper citation on the next assignment. It is up to you to verify that your citation procedure is correct.
Guidance on Assembling an Annotated Bibliography
1. The goal of the assignment is to demonstrate to me that you are doing thorough, original research that is relevant to your research question, and informs the point you want to make in your presentation. This will ultimately help you in the long run
2. Do not over-rely on general webpages for information. Academic journals published online, government reports, nonprofit organization reports posted online are different than general webpages with unreviewed information posted. (for an example of such a general webpage, see e.g. http://inventors.about.com/od/estartinventions/a/History-Of-Electric-Vehicles.htm). It is fine to get your research off the ground with such sites, but remember, no one is checking this information. Get facts from reputable, published sources.
3. Cite properly. Use the quick reference page from the Chicago Manual of Style. Note that online journals and reports are cited differently in citations than simple websites. Note also that I do not require a DOI number, URL or access date for a book or academic article that you have accessed online instead of in print. I do require a URL and access date for a website or other purely online source. Let me know if you have questions.
4. Recommendation: At least once, go to the library and look at some actual, full length, printed books on your subject. Even flipping through them will give you a deeper and better perspective on your subject. The Baruch Library is good. The New York Public Library Schwartzman Center, NYPL Science, Industry and Business Library, and Brooklyn Public Library Main Branch are works of art.
4. Here is information to include in your annotated bibliography (thank you to Ben for compiling). Include:
- A full citation of the source, in a Chicago style of your choice (see above):
- This should be easy if you’re using Zotero: right-click the source in your library and choose “generate bibliography from selected item.”
- A concise, selective summary of the source
- by concise, I mean 150-350 words
- by selective, I mean written with a particular use in mind — e.g. summarizing a particular argument the source makes that you wish to agree or disagree with, or summarizing a particular exhibit within the source that you wish to analyze.
- A concise yet detailed rationale for why and how you intend to use the source
- this should relate to the selection made for the summary, and either make it explicit or begin doing the work of (dis)agreeing or analysis.
- by concise, I again mean 150-350 words
- by detailed, I mean to avoid single-sentence rationales, such as “I want to quote the statistics here.” Why are those statistics valuable? What will you do with them once they’re shown? Don’t assume that any mere data speaks for itself, or says the same thing to every audience; use the rationale to begin writing the follow-up paragraph.
There are many online resources and examples for you to consult, e.g. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/01/ and http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/02/ from Purdue, or http://www.lib.umd.edu/ues/guides/annotated-bibliography from the University of Maryland.
4. Share information with your colleagues. There is a great deal of overlap among your topics. This is not a competition. Share information, ideas, divide up approaches, run things by me and each other.
5. Use assigned readings from the class, and try to make interesting connections between them and your topic. I want you to incorporate our readings into your presentations and research.
6. Do your research and compile your annotated bibliography with your final presentation/paper in mind. In both deliverables, you will need to make a strong, clear, original point that is relevant in some way to Shaping the Future of NYC in an era of climate change. The relevance can be constructed in various ways. Again, if you are unsure, speak up!
7. In response to student concerns, I have reduced the page requirement for the final paper to a minimum of five single space pages. Make them mean something!
On April 9th we will meet at the Visitor Center at Newtown Creek no later than 9:15, for a guided tour of the wastewater treatment facility’s anaerobic digester system!
After the tour we will walk around Newtown Creek a bit to soak in the mixture of nature and industry that is there. Stay for the walk if you can.
Please try to make the tour. I understand some of you have Accounting in the AM. I will be glad to email your professor if that is relevant. If you absolutely can’t miss class, I understand.
Wear closed-toed, non-high heeled shoes.
You are responsible for getting there on your own. The address is:
329 Greenpoint Avenue
Greenpoint, Brooklyn NY, 11222
(Enter at the intersection of Greenpoint Avenue and Humboldt Street.)
The best way to get there is the G train, but use hopstop or googlemaps to find a route that meets your needs.
If you are late/delayed: email me at email@example.com OR text/call 917-613-1789
Subway to the Visitor Center at Newtown Creek
Take the G train to Greenpoint Avenue. Use the Greenpoint/Manhattan Avenue exit. With the McDonald’s on your left, walk along Greenpoint Avenue one long block east and cross McGuinnes Boulevard. Continue on Greenpoint Avenue to the next traffic light and cross Provost. The Newtown Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant will be on your left. Follow the fence-line and continue walking until you reach the main gate to the plant, at a traffic light on Humboldt Street. The Visitor Center at Newtown Creek will be in front of you. It is a two-story orange brick building surrounded by a garden and water sculpture.
Hi again everyone,
Based on some conversations with students, I wanted to offer some additional pointers on your timelines.
1. The timeline is a research tool that should help you organize your thinking on your topic and make sure you aren’t postponing research until the last minute.
For this reason, you, not the author of a published timeline, should be in the driver’as seat in constructing the sequence of important events. It is fine to reference one or more published timelines, but the point of this assignment is not for you merely to reproduce them. It is to construct a timeline that is relevant to the question you are addressing in your research.
2. Show me that you are doing good, broad, deep research.
You all have done research projects and papers before. You know how to do research, and if you have questions, you know you can contact me and/or Ben in class, in office hours, or via email. The timeline is the first chance for you to show me what you have been doing, what sources you have consulted, and where your research is going. Make sure each event in the timeline is significant for your research (not just filler).
As always, contact me with questions.
This is just a reminder that timelines are due at 10:30 PM on Monday, March 18th. Contact me soon if you have questions. These timelines should be the anchor to gearing up the research you are to be doing over the rest of the semester. Make sure they reflect the research you have done so far.
As mentioned in the original assignment, you must cite references and the timeline should be at a minimum three pages. You may double space between line entries, but as with all assignments the entries themselves should be single spaced.
Submit your timelines as a posting on the site in the “Timelines” area, but keep a copy of the timeline in Word. I may ask you for it if I need to verify your three page minimum.
Hi Everyone: next Tuesday evening during Public Affairs Week we have a highly relevant panel that I am moderating. Please consider attending! RSVP not needed.
City Sustainability and the Prospects for Waste Disposal
Tuesday March 12, 6:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m.
Baruch College, Newman Vertical Campus
55 Lexington Ave (corner of 24th Street), Rm 14-220
Samantha MacBride, Assistant Professor
Venetia Lannon is the regional director for Region 2
(New York City) for the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation. Prior to this, she was senior
vice president of the New York City Economic Development
Corporation, where she led the Maritime group. In
her previous work at EDC, she was an active participant
in the development and negotiation of the City’s 20-year
Solid Waste Management Plan. Before joining NYCEDC in
2003, Ms. Lannon was a deputy director at the New York
City Department of Sanitation’s Recycling Bureau where
she oversaw the composting program. Ms. Lannon holds
a Bachelor’s degree from Vassar College and a Masters in
Public Administration from Columbia University.
Ron Gonen is deputy commissioner of sanitation for the
City of New York where he is responsible for managing
New York City’s recycling and waste reduction programs.
He also serves as an adjunct professor at Columbia
Business School. Mr. Gonen is the co-founder of
RecycleBank. During his tenure as CEO from 2004-2010,
RecycleBank grew to a company that diverted over a
billion pounds from landfills. Prior to RecycleBank, Mr.
Gonen was in management consulting at Accenture and
Deloitte Consulting. He was recognized in 2009 by the
United Nations Environment Program as a Champion of
the Earth. He was the recipient of the 2010 University
Medal of Excellence from Columbia University and was
awarded the Social Enterprise Teaching Award by Columbia
http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/honors/files/2013/02/PAWbrochure-final.pdf – link to brochure
Climate Change and Cities Datathon: Public Presentations and Judging
This weekend, five teams of scholars, thinkers, writers, and practitioners will convene to participate in the Institute for Public Knowledge’s first Datathon. The theme, Climate Change and Cities, asks these groups to think about the nature of both meteorological and social data, and to consider ways that these different kinds of data can be used to help us better understand the relationship between climate change and our cities, and to help inform the decisions we will make as we plan for our collective future.
At noon on Sunday, March 10th, these five teams will present their findings in a session that is open to the public. A winning team will be selected by a panel judges:
Dalton Conley, University Professor at NYU
Duncan Watts, Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research
Maryam Hariri, City Planner, NYC Department of City Planning
- Climate Change and Cities Datathon: Public Presentations and Judging
- Sunday Mar 10, 2013 | 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm
- Institute for Public Knowledge, New York
- Institute for Public Knowledge
- Street: 20 Cooper Square, 5th floor
- ZIP: 10003
- City: New York
- State: NY
Biogas in the Basement
Wed, 2013-03-06 10:23
Frustrated by unreliable waste collection, several high-rise apartment complexes in Kochi, India, are turning lemons into lemonade – or more accurately, biogas. Using technology pioneered in Europe, the buildings feature onsite biogas plants that process residents’ food scraps and other biodegradable waste into energy. While the resulting electricity from one 24-flat building currently using the technology is not enough to power the entire complex, it is powering the cooking appliances for the onsite security staff.
So every time residents see their doorman eating a microwave burrito, they can take pride in knowing that the discarded remains of their gourmet meal made it happen.
Source: The Times of India
Related Articles: A Lot to Digest: The State of Anaerobic DigestionComposting Council, Biogas Council Join Efforts on Organics Recycling
Mark Item As: Commentary
Source URL: http://waste360.com/blog/biogas-basement
Richard posted a good question about timeline research that I thought I would respond to on the site so that everyone could share. Here is what he wrote:
Hey, it’s me, Richard Chan from IDC 4001H. My group’s topic is virtual trees.
We are curious about how to start about with the timeline memo. We want to focus more on the mechanical workings of the tree, rather than the publicity campaign of it. Given how (very) recent this innovation is, we were curious as to what we were to be looking back for. Should we search for the beginnings of carbon capture technology? The first ideas of carbon sequestration? Do we go back and look at the origins of the chemicals used (which, upon the cursory glance, seem like surprisingly commonplace, if not a tad dangerous, chemicals)?
As with many good questions, this one contains the seeds of its own answer. Think about history this way: nothing arises out of nothing; everything has some kind of precursor. The best research involves seeing the precursor(s) in the present day example you are studying. Richard mentions the beginnings of carbon capture technology, carbon sequestration as an approach to mitigation, and origins of chemicals. All of these are appropriate to look into historically to some degree, the latter two (sequestration and chemicals) are more general background, while the first (specific technology) would more directly lead to the topic under study. Also of interest is the notion that technology should mimic biology, and that the negative consequences of human intervention into nature can be solved by more intervention into nature (as opposed to growing more natural trees).
On a more concrete level, I would organize the timeline around the technology of carbon capture, keeping these other historical currents in mind, either as themes to explore in the final paper, or concepts to look out for when constructing the timeline.
Finally, don’t stress out over this exercise. It is meant to get you thinking about your topic, and I don’t expect an exhaustive list of every event leading up to the present iteration of your issue (that would be impossible).
Keep the questions coming!
This is just a reminder and review of the elements of a question that is meant to engage discussion for our readings each week.
First, the question should not be primarily factual. In other words, the question should not be an assignment to readers to go look up information and report back. It should engage discussion. It should be based on a premise that the person posting sets up. Why do they ask this question, based on what they have read and thought about? This is why at least one sentence setting up the question is needed. The question itself, furthermore, must cover at least two readings, even if the person posting has been assigned to specialize in one of the readings. One or more other reading(s) can be brought in via skimming if need be.
Looking forward to seeing everyone Tuesday!
Hi, all — In light of the adjusted class time (ending at 1:30, with a 10 minute break in the middle), I’m moving up my office hours. They’ll still be just after class, but now that means they’ll run from 1:50-3:50pm on Tuesdays, which matches my Monday time. You can always find up-to-date information, as well as a link to reserve my attention, at http://eportfolios.macaulay.cuny.edu/baruchitfs/office-hours/#Ben Miller.
This may be of interest to some of you!
The History of Climate Change and the Future of Global Governance
Department of History, Columbia University May-August 2013
The Hertog Global Strategy Initiative (HGSI) seeks talented undergraduate and graduate students for its 2013 seminar on the History of Climate Change and the Future of Global Governance.
HGSI is a research program that explores how the world community has responded to planetary threats to derive lessons that will help us take on the challenges of the present and the future. Each summer, a select group of students from across the nation comes to Columbia University for three months to work with leading scholars and policymakers. This year’s initiative hopes to train a new generation of researchers and leaders who understand both the development of climate science and the changing nature of world politics.
The 2013 seminar will be taught by Matthew Connelly, Professor of History at Columbia University, and Jim Fleming, Professor of Science, Technology, and Society at Colby College. They will be assisted in the classroom by Deborah Coen, Paul Edwards, Mike Hulme, Bill McKibben, Gavin Schmidt, and nearly a dozen other leaders in the field.
Participants pursue original research both independently and in teams.
Students will receive eight credit points for the seminar, the equivalent of two semester-long courses at Columbia.
For more information about the program, visit globalstrategy.columbia.edu.
You can also find us on
Please direct any further questions to firstname.lastname@example.org or 212-854-9854.
Application Deadline: March 5, 2013
Apply at: http://globalstrategy.
Nicole K. Ferraiolo
The Hertog Global Strategy Initiative
New York, NY 10027
I enjoyed class today quite a bit, and was glad to begin to get to know each of you. One thing I neglected to mention: you don’t need to limit postings and discussion to your Engage / Respond / Discuss assignments. Feel free to post and reply freely about the class content as you wish.
Important announcements will appear here, in the sidebar, so you’re less likely to miss them. Be on the lookout.