Drawing from Anderson’s “Social Infrastucture As A Means To Achieve The Right To The City,” Lefebvre discusses two propositions that must be considered in order to achieve the right to the city. One of those propositions includes experimentation with models and spatial forms of urban times in which inhabitants are encouraged to explore the “holes and chasms” existing between planned and formal structures of the dominant society. Think of some “holes and chasms” such as empty lots, abandoned buildings, closed off plots, etc that are overlooked as valueless because they do no represent the main interests of the society. How can such spaces provide an opportunity for the study and development of the new production of space to be used socially for the benefit of your community. Can you envision these spaces as serving some other purpose that can work towards reforming NYC, or the city it’s within?
TopicsNYC politics modernism global warming right to the city futurism science composting law virtual trees place climate change adaptation waterfront wasted food business climate change mitigation timeline infrastructure cooking carbon sequestration incineration carbon information technology transportation rooftops climate change oyster beds recycling water time waste prevention farming (video) gaming physics demographics transhumanism parks and nature wetlands postmodernism Sandy biofuels risk-based approach environmental justice cities housing planning culture complexity architecture environmentalism energy marsh parks Italian futurism systems theory art post-modernism technology waste-to-energy waste management Mannahatta artificial intelligence risk PlaNYC solar energy