Drawing from Anderson’s “Social Infrastucture As A Means To Achieve The Right To The City,” Lefebvre discusses two propositions that must be considered in order to achieve the right to the city. One of those propositions includes experimentation with models and spatial forms of urban times in which inhabitants are encouraged to explore the “holes and chasms” existing between planned and formal structures of the dominant society. Think of some “holes and chasms” such as empty lots, abandoned buildings, closed off plots, etc that are overlooked as valueless because they do no represent the main interests of the society. How can such spaces provide an opportunity for the study and development of the new production of space to be used socially for the benefit of your community. Can you envision these spaces as serving some other purpose that can work towards reforming NYC, or the city it’s within?
Topicsincineration risk rooftops climate change waste-to-energy carbon climate change mitigation marsh parks technology transportation art modernism transhumanism law environmentalism science timeline waterfront physics cooking waste management carbon sequestration parks and nature recycling place farming virtual trees culture (video) gaming waste prevention PlaNYC information technology post-modernism Italian futurism solar energy architecture oyster beds time NYC politics risk-based approach water cities complexity artificial intelligence housing biofuels Sandy Mannahatta business right to the city energy global warming futurism planning climate change adaptation infrastructure wetlands systems theory environmental justice wasted food demographics postmodernism composting