Drawing from Anderson’s “Social Infrastucture As A Means To Achieve The Right To The City,” Lefebvre discusses two propositions that must be considered in order to achieve the right to the city. One of those propositions includes experimentation with models and spatial forms of urban times in which inhabitants are encouraged to explore the “holes and chasms” existing between planned and formal structures of the dominant society. Think of some “holes and chasms” such as empty lots, abandoned buildings, closed off plots, etc that are overlooked as valueless because they do no represent the main interests of the society. How can such spaces provide an opportunity for the study and development of the new production of space to be used socially for the benefit of your community. Can you envision these spaces as serving some other purpose that can work towards reforming NYC, or the city it’s within?
Topicsartificial intelligence carbon PlaNYC housing (video) gaming modernism carbon sequestration timeline wasted food information technology futurism wetlands climate change incineration science cities time virtual trees culture NYC politics rooftops infrastructure architecture farming transportation waste management climate change adaptation transhumanism right to the city risk-based approach demographics solar energy environmental justice physics technology waterfront Italian futurism cooking place composting complexity risk climate change mitigation law post-modernism postmodernism environmentalism marsh parks systems theory waste prevention business biofuels waste-to-energy Sandy planning energy water art global warming parks and nature recycling oyster beds Mannahatta