All posts by natalieschuman

Lower East Side

Profile of a Neighborhood: The Lower East Side

One day last week for work I had to make a delivery to an office building on Seventh Avenue and 47th street. I got on the train at 14th street and 1st avenue, squinting from the sunlight. When I got off of the train in midtown, as I walked from the subway to the lobby of the colossal, black, metallic office building that was my destination, I was struck by something incredible. The office building took up most of the west side of the avenue and the main entrance faced east. At this time in the afternoon, the city should be sunny like it was on the Lower East Side. But the buildings on the east side of the street blocked the sun from coming through. There was a bit of light that managed to squeeze between two buildings on the east side of the street. The office building that I was looking at was completely dark, except for one strip of light, peeking through the hole between buildings. It made me laugh. The people in the building each got a bit of sunlight, probably for 15 minutes every day, until the strip of light moved as the sun changed positions in the sky.

I delivered the package and got back on the train to go to the store. When I got off at 14th street, I could see the sun again, and I enjoyed feeling the heat on the back of my neck as I strolled back to work. The LES is one of the few places left in Manhattan without many skyscrapers, and that is what makes the Lower East Side such a great place to spend time. But that is changing rapidly. New hotels and apartment buildings are being built up, looming over the original tenement buildings. Not only will these huge buildings eliminate sunlight, but they will destroy the rich history and culture of this unique neighborhood.

The Lower East Side spans from East Houston Street to the north, the East River to the east, Canal Street to the South and the Bowery to the west. This historic neighborhood has undergone a massive transformation in the past 2 decades. The rapid gentrification of the LES has prompted the National Trust for Historic Preservation to place the neighborhood on their list of America’s Most Endangered Places (National Trust for Historic Preservation). According to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, “permits were approved for the full demolition of 11 buildings on the Lower East Side, compared with just one in 2006” (1). The new LES will be drastically different from the one that thousands of immigrants lived in during their first years in America.

The Lower East Side used to be a neighborhood filled with immigrants from all over the world. When we think of New York City as a melting pot, we must think of the history of the Lower East Side. Home to countless different ethnic groups, often overlapping, the fabric of the LES is complex and unique. The neighborhood has seen conflict between ethnic groups, extreme poverty and for some, the success of the American Dream.

The Lower East Side was home to a huge number of immigrants. During the peak of immigration into the United States at the turn of the 20th century, almost ¾ of all of the people who entered the country came in through the port of New York (National Archives). According to LowerEastSideNY.com, upon their arrival, many immigrants to New York City were “directed to head towards the Lower East Side”. 97 Orchard Street, now the location of the Lower East Side Tenement Museum, was once home to almost 7,000 immigrants (National Archives).The neighborhood has been home to many different ethnic groups.

The LES was once known as Keindeutschland, Little Germany, because in its early development, it was home to a large German population. According to the New York Public Library’s profile of the Lower East Side, starting in the mid-19th century, the streets were lined with German cafes and grocery stores, beer halls and one of the first department stores, Ridley’s, on Grand street (10). Then there was an influx in Jewish residents in the late-19th century, running from economic troubles and religious persecution. So many of these Jewish immigrants came to the Lower East Side that if it was its own city, it would have “been the largest Jewish city in the world in the late-19th-century” (Krucoff 24). The neighborhood also included strong Italian, Polish and Ukrainian communities (LowerEastSideNY.com 1).

Today, the neighborhood has a strong but dwindling Ukrainian community. Some still call it “Little Ukraine”. During the recent crisis in Ukraine, residents of the neighborhood have shown their support for their homeland by hanging up signs and placing candles in window sills. I spoke to a woman named Anna who worked in a business with one of these signs (Anna chose not to give her last name). Anna came to New York City in 1995 and has lived on the Lower East Side with various family members since then. When asked about the sign Anna said, “I feel confused because I want to be there fighting with my family and friends but I have built a life for myself here, so I will try to support them from here”. In regards to the changing neighborhood, she said, “yes, the neighborhood is very different now, but we will stay here as long as we can, we have roots here.”

The neighborhood has seen much transformation since its original occupation by poor immigrants in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Next came the hippies, artists and beatniks of the 1960 and 1970s, like Patti Smith, for example, who lived on St. Marks place with Robert Mapplethorpe (Smith). In the past few decades, the neighborhood has entered its final stage as real estate developers demolish historic buildings for trendy hotels and condominiums.

For most of its history, the Lower East Side was considered a slum. In the late-19th and early-20th centuries, “families were crowded into small, run-down tenement apartments” with no running water, indoor plumbing and little light. Disease spread quickly in such small apartments, and fires started easily. The Tenement Museum on Orchard Street has restored a tenement apartment to its former state. The museum tours offer an in depth look at how these people lived. From my trip to the museum, I recall very little light in the apartments, tiny rooms and walls that were falling apart.

Due to the poor living conditions of people on the LES, there was an active social reform movement in the neighborhood. Organizations like the Educational Alliance and the Henry Street Settlement were established to teach people about basic hygiene and provide education for children and adults. Social reformer Jacob Riis took photographs of people in the tenements and published a book called “How the Other Half Lives”. Middle and upper class people were shocked to see what poor conditions people in their own city had to live with.

Beginning in the late 1950s, the LES began to symbolize the antithesis of suburban American society. One of the few neighborhoods in New York with such ethnic diversity and class differences, the Lower East Side was the perfect epicenter of the rise of the 1960s counterculture. According to Christopher Mele, author of “Selling the Lower East Side”, between 1964 and 1968, there was a “cultural explosion of art, music, theater, film, writing, and… public performance, all of which were linked to the loosely connected hippie movement” (154).

The real estate developers and retailers coming into the Lower East Side are not necessarily trying to hide the LES’s poor beginnings. In fact, Mele, the LES is being rebranded as a cleaner, more commercial and trendy version of the urban despair the LES has always been known for. He writes, “the contemporary redevelopment of the Lower East Side is premised on the symbolic inclusion of the characteristics long associated with the Lower East Side – among others, continual political activism, the working-class struggle for survival, and the presence of marginalized subcultures and the avant-garde” (Melem, VIII). The new LES’s culture of urban despair is meant to appeal to affluent “alternative” types and is corporatized. Mele describes this phenomenon well by referencing the musical Rent. Playing on Broadway when his book was published, Mele states that most of the people in the audience are white upper-middle-class residents who ironically story a group of young people in the East Village and their “urban struggles with AIDS, heroin addiction, homelessness, squatting, forced evictions, real estate gouging and the dilemma of ‘making art’ and ‘selling out’” (1). This time period along with the history of the LES is now a marketing approach.

The gentrification of the Lower East Side has led to a loss of diversity that once made this immigrant neighborhood so multicultural and unique. According to the New York Census, there was a decline of every non-white and non-Asian group from 1990 to 2010. Most telling, there was a 10% of Hispanics living on the Lower East Side from 1990 to 2010 (Nyc.gov). In a matter of years, the LES will look nothing like the extremely diverse neighborhood it once was.

Longtime residents of the neighborhood are not just sitting back while these changes take place. John Casey is an Irish immigrant and small business owner who has lived on the Lower East Side for over 30 years now. Casey says that he sees resistance against redevelopment among residents all of the time: “I read a few blogs that talk all about the gentrification and how angry people are… people are angry, that’s for sure. For me and my friends, the Lower East Side has been home for so long, it has such a rich culture and it’s heartbreaking to see corner stores that have been there for decades close and then you see a chain store opening up a month later.”

Casey reads “The Lo-Down” and “Lower East Side History Project”. Both blogs update readers on which stores are closing, what new efforts are being made to prevent the redevelopment of this neighborhood. A recent post on the “Lower East Side History Project” blog reports the closing of King Glassware, one of the oldest surviving restaurant supply stores on the Bowery. The store survived “two world wars, the Great Depression, recessions in the 1980s and 2000s” but could not survive in the face of gentrification (Lower East Side History Project).There are several organizations and online publications that inform residents about unfair changes and try to keep the old LES alive.

Walking through the streets of the Lower East Side, I can still feel the sun beating on my neck, but in a few decades, when old tenements will be demolished to make way for new condominiums and trendy coffee shops, it will not be as sunny. The LES still has an incredible story to tell, the neighborhood has seen so much change and so many different kinds of people.

Works Cited

Anna. Personal interview. 20 Apr. 2014.

Casey, John. Personal interview. 20 Apr. 2014.

“11 Most Endangered Historic Places: The Lower East Side.” preservationnation.org. National Trust for Historic Preservation, n.d. Web. 7 May 2014. <http://www.preservationnation.org/issues/11-most-endangered/locations/lower-east-side.html#.U2phFIFdVBk>.

“District Profile 3.” nyc.gov. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 May 2014. <http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/census/census2010/pgrhc.pdf>.

“History of the LES – Lower East Side New York.” Lower East Side New York History of the LES Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 May 2014. <http://www.lowereastsideny.com/about/history-of-the-les/>.

Krucoff , Rebecca. “The Lower East Side.” New York Neighborhoods. New York Public Library, n.d. Web. 7 May 2014. <http://www.nypl.org/sites/default/files/lowereastsideguide-final_0.pdf>.

“LOWER EAST SIDE HISTORY PROJECT .the blog.” Bowery loses another staple: King Glassware closes. N.p., 12 Mar. 2014. Web. 7 May 2014. <http://evhp.blogspot.com/2014/03/bowery-loses-another-staple-king.html#comment-form>.

“Life on the Lower East Side: A Tenement over Time.” National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives and Records Administration, n.d. Web. 7 May 2014. <http://www.archives.gov/nyc/education/tenement.html>.

“Life on the Lower East Side: A Tenement over Time.” National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives and Records Administration, n.d. Web. 7 May 2014. <http://www.archives.gov/nyc/education/tenement.html>.

Mele, Christopher. Selling the Lower East Side: culture, real estate, and resistance in New York City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000. Print.

Smith, Patti. Just kids. New York: Ecco, 2010. Print.

 

 

Young People and the Midterm Elections

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/29/upshot/why-the-democrats-turnout-problem-is-worst-in-north-carolina.html?rref=upshot

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/upshot/the-myth-of-swing-voters-in-midterm-elections.html

As young people, the country is depending on us in the upcoming midterm elections. In states like North Carolina that are divided into the older people who tend to be more conservative and younger people who tend to be more liberal, young people are less likely to vote in the midterm elections. In the presidential elections the turn out is pretty equal but in midterm elections, older voters turn out at much higher rates than younger ones.

This is not just a problem in North Carolina. In “The Myth of Swing Voters in Midterm Elections”, NYTimes writer Lynn Vavreck discusses the lack of democrat voter turnout in young people during the 2010 elections: “But on turnout, the numbers were not evenly balanced for Democrats and Republicans. Only 65 percent of Obama’s 2008 supporters stuck with the party in 2010 and voted for a Democrat in the House. The remaining 28 percent of Mr. Obama’s voters took the midterm election off. By comparison, only 17 percent of McCain’s voters from 2008 sat out the midterms.” During midterm elections, deomocrats routinely have worse voter turn out than republicans. More democrats come from groups like Latinos and young people, who tend to vote at lower rates in midterm elections. Here’s another article from 2010 about the problem: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/11/us/politics/11poll.html.

A lot of people complain about Obama’s innaction during his presidency which I totally agree with, but I also think that so much progress has been impeded by bipartisan conflict in Congress. This midterm election could change that. I think we should all register to vote if we have not already and remind our peers that even if the midterm elections aren’t as flashy as the presidential election, they can make as big of a difference. Do you guys agree?

Story Pitch

For my story I will speak with my father, who was born and raised in America but offers a different kind of immigrant story, one that we haven’t talked about as much but seems just as interesting to me. My dad was born and raised in Philadelphia and I think that it would be interesting to hear about his short but transformative journey to New York City. I wonder why he and his sister chose to leave their hometown and move here. I wonder how hard it was to make the adjustment and whether he felt like an outsider the way many actual immigrants do (from another country, not state).

More Public Transportation in Gentrifying Neighborhoods

http://nyti.ms/QxYOTI

This video explains a proposal to increase public transportation in up and coming neighborhoods around New York City. I have definitely noticed the lack of public transportation in areas like Dumbo and Red Hook and would appreciate more access.

However, the fact of gentrification cannot be ignored in this conversation. We have talked a lot about it in this class and it makes me wonder whether these neighborhoods would be possibly getting better public transportation if they weren’t marked by economic development. It seems unfair that only neighborhoods “colonized by millenials” with “sky rocketing property values” should get better transportation.

Or is this just the way things work? The city will slowly improve neighborhood by neighborhood, and only as each one becomes gentrified?

I definitely agree that the public transportation should increase in these areas, I just worry that other neighborhoods are not getting the same attention because there is not an ikea within walking distance.

Project Proposal: Lower East Side Gentrification

My idea for this project is to focus on the recent transformation of the Lower East Side. In the past few decades, this neighborhood has gone from a diverse, low income, immigrant and sometimes dangerous neighborhood to a hip, gentrified, safe, family-oriented one. The Lower East Side is full of stories of this transformation and I think that they would be interesting to look at. The neighborhood used to be a stop on the road to “making it”, and it is now the goal for many people, the mark of having “made it”.

One of the key changes that has led to the new Lower East Side is the gentrification and the moving out of small businesses and moving in of big ones. That is why I will primarily tell this story from the perspective of my boss John Casey, who has had his Rubber Stamp Shop on the LES for over 2 decades now. He has seen the neighborhood change and can be a great source. 

His shop is one of the few old LES spots left, one of the few original businesses. An Irish Immigrant and now the owner of a successful small business, John has definitely made it. His friends who stop by the store all of the time can also be my guides to the transformation of the LES.

I will record John and my interview as well as take videos and pictures of him and the neighborhood. I will locate certain spots that have transformed and maybe go through the history of businesses on a particular block to express that change.

Grand Concourse Tour Reaction

Despite the rain and wind, I enjoyed the tour on Saturday and definitely learned a lot. My favorite spot on the tour was the statue of Die Lorelei. I volunteer in the South Bronx so I walk through that park and pass that statue once a week. Somehow, I had never stopped to look at the beautiful statue. Hearing the incredible history of it and its place in history made me appreciate it even more. I will definitely stop and look at it for a moment next time I pass it. 

To me, the most significant part of the tour was the emphases Sam put on the idea that just because a neighborhood is poor, does not mean it has to be ugly. When we walked into the lobby of the first building on Grand Concourse and he showed us how much planning had gone into the building of the lobby so that there was a perfect view from the corridor of the fountain and the light, I was blown away. This, along with the statue in the park are things I would have never noticed but do make an incredible difference in the aesthetic of the neighborhood. It does prove that sometimes all you need is a little thought, not money to improve the way a place looks.

I have attached a picture I took of the statue and an Englishphoto1 translation of the poem that the statue is based on. 

 know not if there is a reason
Why I am so sad at heart.
A legend of bygone ages
Haunts me and will not depart.

The air is cool under nightfall.
The calm Rhine courses its way.
The peak of the mountain is sparkling
With evening’s final ray.

The fairest of maidens is sitting
Unwittingly wondrous up there,
Her golden jewels are shining,
She’s combing her golden hair.

The comb she holds is golden,
She sings a song as well
Whose melody binds an enthralling
And overpowering spell.

In his little boat, the boatman
Is seized with a savage woe,
He’d rather look up at the mountain
Than down at the rocks below.

I think that the waves will devour
The boatman and boat as one;
And this by her song’s sheer power
Fair Lorelei has done.

Williamsburg: From Hasidic to Hipster

Natalie Schuman

Macaulay Honors College: The Peopling of New York City University of New York

Assignment Three: An Immigrant Journey

Williamsburg: From Hasidic to Hipster

I am a fourth generation American and my most recent immigrant ancestors moved to the area around Philadelphia when they arrived from Poland, Lithuania and Hungary. My dad’s side of the family was Jewish and were very religious when they moved to America. Hasidic neighborhoods in different Northeastern cities are often similar so I have chosen to examine the neighborhood of Williamsburg.

This neighborhood is interesting for me to look at it because it embodies my past in that my great, great grandparents were once Hasidic people living in an urban area. But it also embodies my identity in that I have friends who live there, I often shop and eat there, and I can relate to the new people moving in – young, artistic people. I can find my identity represented in both sides of the great struggle of past decade between the Hasidic people who have been living in Williamsburg for years and the incoming “hipsters” who are gentrifying the neighborhood.

I was born and raised in Manhattan but much of my social life existed in Brooklyn and downtown Manhattan. Williamsburg was definitely a frequent stop for my friends and me. We loved the trendy cafés and the thrift stores.

If my Jewish great-great-grandparents had immigrated to New York City and not Philadelphia, they would have likely settled in a neighborhood similar to Williamsburg. They would have known people already living there and perhaps stayed with them until they got on their feet. They would join their synagogue and find jobs in the neighborhood. In a few years they would have been a part of the community and considered Williamsburg home.

However, as a half-Jewish young American woman, I would have little in common with my family members who lived in communities like that. Ironically, I would fit in better with the hipsters of Williamsburg than I would with the Hasidic people, even though they are technically “my people”. 

Walking around Williamsburg, I can feel the pull of both sides of my identity. I get off the L train at Bedford Avenue. I head South on Bedford Avenue towards the Williamsburg Bridge. For the next ten blocks or so, I am confronted by vintage stores, tattoo parlors and lots of hip white people on bikes. As I continue south, I can see the Williamsburg Bridge in the distance. This bridge acts as the dividing line between the two cultures that are primarily represented in this region.

As I continue down Bedford Avenue, I note the lack of a bike lane. For a short time, there was bike lane here that stretched fourteen blocks and garnered much controversy. The hipsters in the neighborhood were very happy about the bike lane. It allowed them to travel via bicycle to work and on trips to health food store. But the Satmar community was very upset as it ran right through their neighborhood. At community board meetings, representatives for the Satmar community spoke out against the bike lane as a disruption to pedestrian traffic and school bus routes.

While this reason was not mentioned in the board meetings, it is likely that the Satmar people were worried about more hipsters taking the route through the Satmar community. Many also claimed that the Satmar were worried that scantily dressed women would be riding through their part of town. In 2009, after Bloomberg won his campaign for reelection, the bike lane was removed. It is generally believed that the bike lane was a reward for the Satmar community’s bloc vote for Bloomberg.

Just before I get to the bridge, I stop in Traif for some lunch. Traif means “unkosher” in Yiddish and carries a critical connotation. Traif specializes in pork and shellfish – go figure. In traditional hipster sarcasm and irony, this restaurant, located right at the border between hipster and Hasidic Williamsburg pokes fun at the Hasidic dietary restrictions while referencing American’s own excessive obsession with pork. Traif’s logo is a drawing of a pig with a heart in the middle. The menu includes strawberry-cinnamon glazed Berkshire baby back ribs and a risotto of Maine lobster, spicy sausage, toasted barley, pistachios and mushrooms.

Walking through Williamsburg along Bedford Avenue, I can feel the sharp change. As I walk under the Williamsburg Bridge, I see no more trendy Thai restaurants or chic cafés. The number of people wearing Doc Martens and flannels sharply decreases. Instead, the streets are filled with people wearing traditional Hasidic outfits and shuls line the streets.

Walking through this part of the neighborhood, I don’t exactly fit in. I am Jewish but I am wearing a flannel and doc martens. I am what the Hasidim would call artisten. This is their Americanized Yiddish word for a hipster. Once in the Hasidic part of Williamsburg, I head west on Broadway and pass 60 Broadway. A huge building filled with condominiums. This building used to be the Gretsch Musical Instrument Factory but is now home to hundreds of apartments. The building was converted in 2003 as the neighborhood was changing to accommodate more affluent young people. The Hasidic people protested but it was eventually converted to the apartment building it is today.

Now we wonder, why couldn’t these two groups get along? Men in both groups are famous for sporting big, bushy beards. Hassidic fashion has been stable for decades and evokes style of the past. Hasidic men wear overcoats, t’fillin and Shtreimel, which is a fur hat worn by married men. The women are usually completely covered and some cover their hair or wear wigs.  Similarly, hipsters are always looking to the past to influence their fashion choices, finding overalls or a 50’s housewife dress hip.

Of course, I am joking. These two groups of people are extremely different. Hipsters are by definition progressive people. They tend to be very politically liberal, independently thinking, etc. These values are very different from the very conservative, traditional Hasidic people living across the border. On top of that, Hasidic people are very insular and would not be happy to share their neighborhood with a whole different group of people.

I think Williamsburg is not only interesting because of the ties it has to my own identity, but because it is changing so rapidly. In a few years, there may be no more Hasidic people left, all forced out by the high rents and lack of strong community. While I still feel connected to both sides of the struggle for Williamsburg, it is a shame that they cannot coexist. 

 

My Immigrant Story

I am fourth generation American. Because of this, the stories regarding my ancestors’ travels to America and their first experiences here have become reduced to little more than facts and a few memorable details. Despite this, I will attempt to fill in the blanks of where my family came from.

My mother’s father’s grandmother came from a village called Porak in Czechoslovakia. Porak was a mining village and she came from a coal mining family. They came to America for more opportunities. They immigrated to a mining town near the Poconos called Eckley. My mother’s father’s grandfather came from Warsaw, Poland. He and his family also immigrated to Eckley where the two met. My great-great grandfather was a miner in Eckley and they raised their family there. Eckley is a famous mining town because it was the home of the Molly Maguires. The Molly Maguires were a secret society of coal miners. Their children stayed in Eckley and so did my grandfather until he moved to Philadelphia where he met my grandmother.

Little is known about my grandmother’s grandparents except that they were born in Ireland until they moved to Brooklyn. They stayed in Brooklyn for a few years, then moved to Philadelphia and worked in a factory that made machine parts. The majority of my mother’s family is still in the Philadelphia area today. I think it is interesting how families will travel thousands of miles to come to America and then will stay in one town, or area for generations and generations.

 

My father’s side of the family comes from all over Eastern. One of my grandmother’s grandmothers was born in Riga, Latvia. My grandmother’s mother’s father was born in Hungary. Half of my grandfather’s family came from Hungary. His other grandparents came from Poland and Lithuania. They were all living in shtettles there, so they came here for more opportunities and a better life.

My grandfather’s grandfather came to America with his family but left many relatives behind. Her father kept in contact with some of his cousins, his mother’s sister’s children. My grandmother still has letters between them from before the war. Everyone on this side of the family is Jewish and unfortunately, the correspondence stopped mid way through the war. These relatives were living in Vilnius in Lithuania which was occupied by German forces during the war. There were about 265,000 Jews living in there and the Nazis in Paneriai murdered 95% of them. My family has assumed that unfortunately, our relatives in Lithuania were killed in a concentration camp. My grandmother keeps the letters between her father and his cousins, and is grateful that her grandfather left when he did.

My grandfather’s mother was born in Hungary and came to America alone when she was 13 years old. Her mother had died and her father remarried to a woman who didn’t want my great grandmother around.

My grandmother’s grandfather settled in a town called Canchahakan where he started silent movie house. It was a real family operation. My grandmother’s aunt played the piano during the films, another aunt took tickets, and another operated the projector.

Natalie Schuman Profile of a story of immigration.

Natalie Schuman. The Peopling of New York City. Professor Rosenblum. Due: Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Assignment 1: Profile of a story of immigration.

Note: I was absent on the first day of class so I did my interview with a friend, not a classmate.

 

Charlotte Kohlmann’s Immigrant Story

 

“Give me your tired, your poor/Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”

-From “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus. 1883.

 

Despite the often-unfair laws regarding immigration today, these words engraved in the base of the Statue of Liberty epitomize the journey of Charlotte Kohlmann’s grandparents to New York City.

Charlotte Kohlmann was born in Riverdale in the Bronx on February 12th, 1994. She lives in a red house in a residential area filled with people from all different countries. She identifies herself as American but has roots in Germany and Italy, among other places.

Charlotte’s mother’s father’s name is Feliche Perrela. He was born in a town called Macchiagodena in Italy. Macchiagodena is a town in the province of Isernia in South Central Italy. It is located in the Appennines Mountains in the region of Molise. Macchiagodena was a farm town and there was little work other than farming. In the early to mid 20th century, many residents of Macchiagodena emigrated to other parts of the world including the United States to find better jobs and earn more money. At 19 years old, Charlotte’s grandfather, Feliche was one of those people. Feliche waited until after the 3rd Sunday in May to leave his town. On this day, a huge fair was held to celebrate the patron saint of the town, San Nicola. He feasted and celebrated with his family and friends as he would any other year. Though there was a feeling of sadness around the celebration as they all knew that Feliche was to leave the next day, along with a dozen other men in the town.

Feliche and the men he traveled to New York with were not the first men from Macchiagodena to start a life here. Feliche went to live with his people in Little Italy in the Bronx. Living in this neighborhood sometimes even felt like being back home. He knew people from his old town and the same sense of community in Italy existed in this small pocket of home in this new, scary city. Feliche got a job as a construction worker. When he got his first paycheck, he sent exactly half of it back to his family in Macchiagodena. Feliche continued to send exactly half of his paycheck back to Macchiagodena until he died in 2005.

As more and more men from Macchiagodena traveled to the Bronx, women started feeling comfortable coming too. That brings us to Jesualda. Jesualda was born in Macchiagodena and at 18 years old, her mother took her and her two sisters to the Bronx. Jesualda grew up in a small apartment in the Bronx. Her neighbors in New York were her neighbors back in the hills of Macchiagodena. She and her neighbors in Little Italy shared a thin wall and a communal bathroom while they used to be separated by acres of farmlands.

It was in Little Italy that Jesualda met Feliche. He courted her for a year and eventually they got married and had two children, one of whom was Charlotte’s mother, Emma. For Feliche and Jesualda, New York City offered a new life that may have been hard at first, but it allowed their ability to put food on the table not be at the whim of the weather and how well their crops did. Jesualda and Feliche never went hungry again, and neither did their children or grandchildren.

 

“We’re leaving now. I don’t know where Papa is.” These were the first words written in a leather bound journal with no name. The journal goes on to tell the story, in French, of Ursula Kohlmann’s journey from Germany to New York City. Ursula is Charlotte’s father’s mother, Charlotte calls her “Opa”. She was a Jew in Germany in 1940 and New York City offered her asylum from Hitler’s hell. She was 14 when she started the journal. It described traveling through Spain, Czechoslovakia, France, all together 15 countries with her mother, until they finally arrived in New York City. Ursula had learned French in school but her mother tongue was German. She wrote the journal in French, left out her name and any clue that she was Jewish to protect herself in case the diary fell into the wrong hands. They took a boat called the “Sepa Pinto” from Portugal to New York City. She still remembers the ride, how frightened she was of both being in a new place, and being caught by the leader of her old country. She remembers her mother threw up on the Sepa Pinto from motion sickness and anxiety.

When she arrived in New York and settled in, her mother enrolled her into a public high school on 153rd street. Ursula was one of the only non-African American students there.  She missed her home and felt out of place in her new environment. She eventually found other Jews who had come to New York City to escape the Nazis. They formed a group and jokingly called themselves “The Elite”.

Paul Kohlmann was also a member of this group. He came to New York from Germany at 19 years old. Paul was the only one in his family healthy enough to flee so he had to leave them all behind in Europe. Paul and Ursula dated for a few months and eventually got married. Paul wanted to fight in the war, on the side of the Americans. But when he got to the recruitment office, he was told he could not fight Germany because he was not an American citizen. They sent him instead to the Army base in the Phillipines.

For Paul, Ursula, Feliche and Jesualda, New York City took them in and protected them, offered them a new life. Charlotte understands the importance of her grandparents’ stories and has taken it upon herself to record and preserve their history. This year, Charlotte helped her grandma translate the diary she kept during her journey to New York City from French to English. She put together a scrapbook of her grandmothers’ photographs. Pictures of “The Elite” on the beach forming pyramids with their bodies fill the pages of the scrapbook.

Natalie Schuman

My name is Natalie Schuman. I was born and raised in New York City. My parents and my older sister come from Philadelphia so I feel a connection with that city as well. My parents Philly roots have influenced the way I speak in some little ways. I know that sounds specific but my cultural history is quite boring compared to many others’. My family has been in America for a few generations, so I have little cultural identity other than New Yorker.

My parents are both very much mixed. My mother is Irish, Czech and Polish. My father has ancestry all over eastern Europe. My father is Jewish and I was raised with both Jewish and Catholic traditions, though I am an atheist. I feel more connected to my Jewish roots and identify  the religion as part of my cultural identity. While I may not practice the religion, I feel its traditions are a part of me and help define who I am.

The diversity of New York has always been one of my favorite things about living here and I am looking forward to learning more about the history of it, and looking at it from an anthropological perspective.