All posts by Sasha Whittaker

Sasha Whittaker, CCNY '17, is an art history major studying the history of photography in central and eastern Europe. Check out her monthly column, "Exhibition of the Month" (formerly "Gallery Sightings") for reviews of art exhibitions in NYC. The column features museums that offer discounts or free admission with Macaulay's Cultural Passport.

Immigrants React to Crisis in Ukraine

Since many of us are following what is going on between Russia and Ukraine, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at how immigrant groups have been responding to this crisis. I found a NYT article about how Ukrainian and Russian immigrants in New York City feel about President Putin’s actions–beyond just the recent protests.

Here is a link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/03/nyregion/action-by-russia-divides-immigrants-in-new-york.html

One would expect opinion to be split based on nationality, with Ukrainians supporting the new Ukrainian government and Russians supporting Putin. However, the issue is not that simple. There are a number of Russians who are angry about Putin’s actions, and plenty of Ukranians–particularly in Odessa and Eastern Ukraine–who want to reunite with Russia.

What are your thoughts? Do you think that the concentration of Russian and Ukrainian immigrants in New York City makes this events in Ukraine feel closer to us, as New Yorkers? Does anyone know of any other examples of how U.S. immigrants respond to current events in their home countries? What does this article say about how immigrants get news and information from their home countries abroad–from relatives, television, radio?

Inside Inwood

On a gray day in early spring, Indian Road Café looks drowsily out over the Spuyten Duyvil Creek to the cliffs and high-rise apartment buildings on the southern shore of the Bronx. The café is a cozy outpost on the northern edge of Inwood, on the northernmost tip of Mahattan Island. Inside, the little restaurant is buzzing with locals who have come for lunch and coffee—an operation carefully managed by Rachel Wilde and Jason Minter.

Rachel Wilde, the manager of Indian Road Café, has lived in Inwood for seven years—in fact, just around the corner from the Indian Road Café. She followed a job offer to New York City when she was in her twenties, and her first experience living in the city was in a boarding house downtown. After she married, she and her husband began to look for an apartment: first they found a nice place in Murray Hill, but following the suggestion of one of her husband’s colleagues—her husband is an academic, a professor of classics—they turned their search to Inwood. Here they found an apartment for the same price as the one in Murray Hill, but much larger. They chose Inwood partly for the additional square feet, and partly because of Inwood’s plentiful green space. The neighborhood boasts impressive parks, including the 196-acre Inwood Hill Park, which is just across the street from Indian Road Café (Jackson).

Jason Minter, the owner of the Indian Road Café, describes Inwood Hill Park as “unusual”: it is enormous, has remarkable geography, and is associated with many legends. Inwood Hill Park is home to Manhattan Island’s last natural forest, and according to legend the sale of Manhattan Island from the Lenape Indians to the Dutch took place under the park’s giant tulip tree. The park is also home to Lenape rock shelters, extensive hiking trails, a bald eagle nursery, and New York City’s last remaining salt marsh (Jackson). East of Inwood Hill Park are the famous 215th Street steps, the historic Dyckman Farmhouse, as well as another, smaller, 20-acre park called Isham Park. Adjacent to Inwood Hill Park on the northeastern tip of the island is Columbia Univesity’s athletic complex and the Allen Pavilion of the NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital. These are the most significant institutions and landmarks of the neighborhood, which also includes an MTA subway yard and city sanitation facilities to the east (Jackson). The most distinctive physical feature of the neighborhood is its collection of beautiful, prewar art deco apartment buildings, the most striking of which can be found on Seaman Avenue. Due to its relatively late settlement in the early 20th century, Inwood developed the second largest collection of art deco buildings in the city, after the Grand Concourse in the Bronx.

Inwood’s parks help to foster a sense of community in the neighborhood. Rachel remarked that it is difficult to take the dog for a walk in the park without running into somebody you know. Jason explains that the neighborhood has a small-town feel, in that everybody knows everybody else’s business and newcomers are warmly welcomed. He calls Inwood “the first small town of the Hudson Valley,” and Rachel thinks of it as “the Mayberry of New York.”

The small-town feel of the neighborhood results in part from its small geographic size and small population: only 46,746 as of 2010 (NYC Census FactFinder).[1] The small-town feel also results from the fact that the neighborhood is highly residential, home to many families. According to Rachel, “the long-standing joke here is that when you move into the neighborhood, you either have to get a child or a dog—one or the other, or else they’ll kick you out!” Inwood also owes its residential nature to its R-7 zoning, which makes it difficult to open new businesses, restaurants, and clubs. As a result this neighborhood appeals less to young singles than to young married couples, who like Inwood because there they can start a family while still remaining in the city. Once the children reach school age, however, many families move out to areas with better schools. In her early years in Inwood, Rachel rarely saw any child older than three: “the kids hit five and then you’re gone.” However this trend has recently begun to change. A few years back a committee of families tackled the local school system and managed to improve public education sufficiently that many families now choose to stay in the neighborhood and raise their children here.

Many people settle in Inwood because they are priced out of neighborhoods like SoHo, especially academics, musicians—particularly jazz musicians—artists, actors, and young professionals (Jackson). Overall the people of Inwood value family, community, and quiet living. According to Rachel, “the neighborhood reflects their own cultural sensibility: even if you have money, you don’t flaunt it.” The exception, of course, is the Dominicans on Dyckman Street.

This brings us to Jason Minter’s story. Jason, now the owner of Indian Road Café, first moved to Inwood in 1991—specifically, to the basement of his girlfriend’s father’s brownstone. Soon the couple got their own apartment in the neighborhood. Jason’s girlfriend’s family was long established in Inwood: they belonged to the Dominican community.

Dominicans are the most recent wave of immigrants to arrive in Inwood. In earlier times, Inwood was home to many Irish. According to Nancy Beth Jackson of the New York Times, Inwood was “the unofficial capital of the Irish diaspora” (Jackson). Though baseball—a Dominican favorite—has long-replaced Gaelic football as the most popular game of the streets, traces of Inwood’s Irish past still remain, most notably in the Church of the Good Shepard, a Roman Catholic church on the corner of Broadway and Isham Street (Jackson). In recent decades the Church has started conducting masses in Spanish to accommodate the new Latin American immigrants. Associated with the Church is the Good Shepard parochial school, which provides the opportunity for a high-quality education in the neighborhood.

The population of Inwood is not exclusively Roman Catholic. Inwood has witnessed the establishment of many new churches, many of them protestant, which have become very active in the community. Only Jews in Inwood seem underserved, and to remedy this they have recently formed an organization called “Inwood Jews”[2] which advocates for more ethnic and religious resources such as kosher markets.

Much of Inwood’s population is foreign-born, and almost all of the foreign-born come from Latin America. Out of all the neighborhoods in Manhattan, Marble Hill-Inwood has the third-highest percentage of residents who are foreign-born—46%—after Chinatown (56.1%) and Washington Heights (49.2%) (The Newest New Yorkers 45). Out of the foreign-born population in Inwood, an overwhelming 69% are Dominican. This gives the neighborhood a heavy Dominican feel, as expressed by Dominican restaurants like Mamajuana on the corner of Seaman Avenue and Dyckman Street (The Newest New Yorkers 48). Marble Hill-Inwood is the third most popular neighborhood for Dominicans in New York City, after Washington Heights—the most popular—and Concourse-Concourse Village in the Bronx (The Newest New Yorkers 66). The remaining foreign-born population in Inwood comes from other parts of Latin America: 8.4% of the foreign-born are from Mexico, 2.6% are from Ecuador, 3.6% are from Cuba, and 1.9% are from Columbia (The Newest New Yorkers 49).

Now Dominicans are beginning to move across the Harlem River to the Western Bronx. According to the The Newest New Yorkers, “The western Bronx has shown the highest growth citywide in its Dominican immigrant population since 2000, whereas Upper Manhattan exhibited the greatest decline” (66). Though Inwood is not gentrifying, its rents are rising, which may be one factors that drives Dominicans to the more-affordable Bronx.

Despite this new trend, Inwood will likely remain a hub of Dominican cultural life for quite some time, particularly around Dyckman Street. At night Dyckman Street comes to life as one of the most exclusive Dominican nightclub scenes in the city. Dominicans from all over the city come to Dyckman Street to party, and it may cost them as much as one hundred dollars to walk in the door of some clubs. Needless to say, this high-end nightlife caters to the most affluent members of the Dominican community. The partying starts on the weekends around 11 p.m. Around 9 p.m., nail salons fill with dressed-up Dominican ladies in stiletto heels, many of whom start sharing drinks right in the salon. This is part of the Dominican party culture: a routine to get ready for a night out. Rachel knows about this premier nightlife strip from her staff, some of whom leave work at Indian Road Café at 11 p.m. to work a shift on Dyckman from 11 p.m. to 4 a.m. Dyckman Street is an exception in the otherwise quiet, residential neighborhood. There is no nightlife in Inwood outside Dyckman, and those who are not Dominican choose to go downtown to have a good time.

How can one reconcile these two parts of Inwood, the quiet and the wild? The young professionals and new families, recent arrivals to the neighborhood, peacefully coexist with the Dominican immigrants already living there. There is neither conflict nor animosity between the two groups. It helps, of course, that the two are separated geographically: quiet neighborhoods lie in the north, while flashy Dyckman Street marks Inwood’s southern border. Another significant geographic division is Broadway, which splits the neighborhood diagonally into a west side and an east side. Parts east of Broadway are heavily Dominican, whereas parts west of Broadway are more ethnically mixed. But the real divide is economic rather than racial: west of Broadway the rents are higher by about 30 percent than on the east (Jackson).

Despite this geographic and economic divide, Inwood is a neighborhood where people of all economic and ethnic backgrounds comingle. Evidence of this can be found in both the staff and the clientele of Indian Road Café. As Jason put it, “its everything”: Mexicans, Peruvians, Dominicans, people from multicultural backgrounds, whites, African Americans, Protestants, Catholics, Jews, and even an Irish bartender—though he comes straight from Ireland, not a product of the 19th-century Irish wave of immigration. Most of the staff lives within a few blocks of the café, and about 80 percent of the clientele is local. This makes Indian Road Café very representative of Inwood as a neighborhood which brings different types of people together into a tight community.

Indian Road Café is itself evidence of the close-knit community Inwood offers. In describing the café’s brand, Rachel says, “think local, small, community.” It is a place for people from the neighborhood to meet and talk, and it also offers an opportunity for parents to have an evening out while staying close enough to home. Indian Road Café holds events like the monthly Inwood History Night—themed discussions for locals to share personal stories and memories—and the weekly Pub Quiz. Rachel jokes that with all these gatherings the place is “half community center.”

Jason believes that the café was a “game-changer” for Inwood: it proved that cafés could be successful here, which led many new cafés to open in the neighborhood. This trend is a reflection of the changing population of Inwood as it becomes more attractive for urban professionals. The growth of restaurants and cafés has also caused a change in people’s habits, as residents of Inwood realize that they need not leave the neighborhood to find a good place to eat. But Jason is not worried about the competition, since Indian Road Café’s unique, community-centered feel is difficult to imitate.

Though Inwood is not particularly troubled with crime and poverty, it does face a few problems. First, since many of the buildings were built in the beginning of the century, quite a few are in need of repairs. Second, Inwood has very little shopping—not even a hardware store. As a result the neighborhood is not yet self-sufficient, since many residents must travel to buy basic necessities, from a screwdriver to a new pair of socks. Finally, Inwood’s residents were hit particularly hard by the recession, since their occupations—musicians, artists, actors, teachers, and young professionals—are particularly vulnerable to the effects of tough economic times. Fortunately, though, the future of the neighborhood is in good hands. Inwood has a very active community board and local Dominican-Americans are developing a significant presence in city politics (Jackson). Though Rachel and Jason are unaware of exactly what social or welfare services are located in Inwood, they say that there must be a soup kitchen or a shelter in the neighborhood, since the neighborhood farmer’s market and food coops sometimes bring extra food to Indian Road Café on days when soup kitchens would be closed.

Although Jason sees Inwood becoming more attractive to urban professionals, he does not foresee any dramatic transformation of the neighborhood in the coming years. He says that “it won’t be the next Williamsburg,” since gentrification is limited by how long it takes to get downtown. Transportation is one major reason why people who can afford higher rents do not find Inwood very attractive. The neighborhood is only served by the 1 train and last stop of the A train, which makes it difficult to go anywhere beyond the West Side.[3]

Jason says that “Inwood will always be the next new thing.” It has been touted as the next place that the gentrifiers will move into, but there seems little chance of gentrification happening anytime soon. Inwood remains a little oasis on the northernmost tip of Manhattan Island, a small town tucked into a corner of the big city, and a close community that embraces people of all ethnic and economic backgrounds. Fortunately it will likely stay that way far into the future.

 

[1] We must subtract from this the population of Marble Hill, which is grouped with Inwood in the census.

[2] For more information, see www.inwoodjews.org .

[3] Inwood is almost completely disconnected from the East Side of Manhattan—residents joke that it is easier to get to 17th Street than it is to get to East 145th Street. Though the green boro cabs have partly made up for the lack in transportation, Inwood still has none of the convenience of downtown Brooklyn.

Indian Road Cafe

Works Cited

Jackson, Nancy Beth. “If You’re Thinking of Living In/Inwood; Away From Manhattan Without Leaving.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 14 Dec. 2002. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.

United States. The City of New York. Department of City Planning. The Newest New Yorkers: Characteristics of the City’s Foreign-Born Population. By Arun Peter Lobo and Joseph J. Salvo. NYC Department of City Planning, Dec. 2013. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.

United States Census Bureau.“NYC Census FactFinder,” generated by Sasha Whittaker using NYC Census FactFinder. < http://maps.nyc.gov/census/> 28 Apr. 2014.

 

(All other information not from these sources came from a personal interview with Rachael Wilde and Jason Minter on April 29th, 2014.)

Chinese Immigrant Smuggling

Found an interesting article in the Times this morning about the recent passing of a very successful smuggler of illegal Chinese immigrants, Chen Chui Ping.

What fascinated me was Chen’s dual reputation: some (the Justice Department) consider her a viscous criminal responsible for the deaths of a number of immigrants (and for the harassment of many more), but others–in particular, the Chinese whom she helped–see her almost like a saint, since she rescued them from poverty and helped them get on their feet after arriving in the USA.

What does everyone think? How can we reconcile the two totally opposite images of Ms. Chen–if we can reconcile them at all?

Here’s a link:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/nyregion/cheng-chui-ping-a-smuggler-of-immigrants-dies-in-prison-but-is-praised-in-chinatown.html

Non-English Speakers in Schools

I found this NYT article about the segregation of English-speaking students and non-English-speaking students in Hylton High School.

Here’s a link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/us/15immig.html

What do you think? Is it better to separate the students and give the non-English speakers extra, tailored academic support to help them succeed? Or is it better to mix the students, but risk having some non-English-speaking students flounder?

Quote from the article: ““High schools have to make a pragmatic choice when it comes to these kids,” said Peter B. Bedford, a history teacher who supports the program. “Are you going to focus on educating them, or socially integrating them?””

Even if segregation is not institutionalized in a high school, have any of you observed a de facto segregation of immigrant groups in school? Between English-speakers and non-native-English-speakers?

(This is just the beginning of the article–plenty of food for thought in the rest of the piece. Please share your observations/thoughts on other parts of the article too!)

“Snapshot: Global Migration”

I stumbled upon this fascinating map of global migration patters on the NY Times website. Here is a link:

http://www.nytimes.com/ref/world/20070622_CAPEVERDE_GRAPHIC.html

The countries are divided into two categories, green for the countries where more people were coming in, yellow for those where more people leaving. 

I was surprised to notice that Russia had more people entering than leaving–I always thought that Russia was more a source of immigrants rather than a destination for them. Another surprise was Spain: more immigrants entered Spain than any other country! (I guess everybody likes Spanish food?? Kidding aside–what could be some possible reasons for this?) I was also surprised to see how many people were immigrating into Afghanistan…I would have expected the opposite! Why does Afghanistan attract so many immigrants? Or do the positive numbers come from foreign troops?

What are your thoughts? Possible answers to my questions above, about Spain and Afghanistan? Interesting observations? Surprises?

*Keep in mind, this map is from 2007. Do you think it would look any different in 2014?

SOMINY Pitches

I have two pitches in mind–I may do both, or I may just choose whichever comes out best.

My first idea is to interview a classmate of mine, a daughter of a Trinidadian immigrant. She is in her senior year at CCNY and she is trying to figure out what she will do next…and the options that she is considering are varied and interesting. I want to talk to her about how she feels she fits into New York–especially since she loves East Asian culture and frequents Asian neighborhoods like Flushing. This would be a story mostly about the future of  making it in New York–though it may also have some elements of the present.

My second idea is to interview my Chinese professor, who is herself an immigrant (from China). Her story of immigration is interesting–for example, on the way to the United States she lived for a while in the Netherlands. I would like to interview her about what brought her to New York, and how she feels she is “making it” here, specifically in terms of her career. Would she have been better off staying in Beijing? This would be a story about making it in the present.

I also had the idea of interpreting “making it” in a literal sense–like, for example, making it to class/work on time in the subway! My first interviewee, the senior at CCNY, has collected a number of interesting subway stories. Maybe those could be examples of “making it” in NYC? Or is this interpretation of “making it” too literal, making the story stray too far from the others in terms of topic and theme?

I could use photography, video, or audio in my interviews. Probably audio would be the most interesting–particularly to capture my Chinese professor’s accent.

I appreciate all your feedback!

 

“New York’s Dream Act Dies”

Last week, the New York State Senate rejected the Dream Act, which would give financial aid to college students who are undocumented immigrants. What do you all think – is it good that the Dream Act was rejected? Or should it have gone through? (Is it worth our tax dollars?)

Personally, I really support giving undocumented immigrants a college education–especially to those who were brought to NY as infants. Moreover, as the article pointed out, having more people with college degrees benefits the state economy.

Check out the article here:

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/new-yorks-dream-act-dies/?hp&rref=opinion

Return to East Harlem

The Mexican boy with the messy apron hands me my slice of pizza on a flimsy paper plate. I step back towards the open window, rest the plate on the sill, grip the crust with my shaky fingers and take a slow first bite. The bottom is burnt, as usual, but nevertheless it seems to melt into the sauce and cheese as I chew. Patsy’s pizza is as good as ever. Even with my dentures in, it tastes good as it did seventy-five years ago, when Papa took me as a treat on my tenth birthday. Can it really be seventy-five years??

Nowadays nobody expects to see an eighty-five-year-old woman walking the streets of East Harlem. The neighborhood has cleaned up considerably, but there are still a good number of crazies wandering around. They do not scare me, though. I am quite active for my age, and I am also very handy with my cane—so all you hoodlums, beware! And after all, how could I be frightened of these familiar streets, where I played as a young girl?

I suppose, though, these streets are not entirely familiar. I used to bump into all kinds of family and friends at each and every corner, but now I am surrounded by foreigners—those Latino types. “El Barrio” sounds to me like the Italian word “barriera,” a barrier, a barrier that blocks me out of here because I no longer belong. “Barriera.” A barrier between me and these strange new people. To me they will always seem strange and new, through they have already been in this neighborhood for over half a century.

Among bodegas, dollar stores and “cuchifritos” (what in heaven’s name are those!?), Patsy’s seems like the last outpost of a forgotten world. But a few of us Italians still remember. Those few who attended the memorial service at Our Lady of Mt. Carmel certainly do.

Joey Caruso died ten years ago. He did not get a parade like Pete Pascale, though by golly, did he deserve one. He deserved ten parades. I remember, right on this corner, when I was playing jacks with Luisa, some ruffian came and stole our ball. Joey Caruso ran right after him and snatched it back! A real gentleman, he was, and he stayed that way his whole life, God bless him.

And now he’s been ashes for ten years. Imagine? There were only about ten or fifteen of us at the memorial service, all old friends of his from the neighborhood. All old folks, like me, who still remember. The inside of the Church is just the same as it was when I was a girl, where Mama and Nonna would kneel down on the pew, white lace over their head and shoulders, rosary beads in their hands. The Church seemed emptier than it was when I was a girl, but I did see a few Spanish ladies crossing themselves, praying in a language that I could not understand. Do their words express the same reverence as Mama’s and Nonna’s?

My son, his wife, and my three grandchildren do not care about this neighborhood the way I do. I left East Harlem for the suburbs once my oldest son was born, in ’50. Today he said he was too busy to come to the memorial. Little Annie has a soccer game, I think. Or maybe it was Little Susie. My memory isn’t as good as it used to be.

But here there are still things that I remember quite clearly. I toss my empty plate into the trash, avoid looking at the Mexican boy with the messy apron, and head back onto the street at a grandmother’s pace. I turn towards Park Avenue. It was here that Jewish tailors lined the streets and an open market bustled beneath the elevated tracks. Suddenly I hear a quick shout, and I turn around half-expecting it to be a Jew haggling with a customer over the price of a suit. They were always very insistent about their prices. I remember threads and strips of fabric beneath our feet and the smell of Eastern European cooking, so different from our own, that radiated from those shops. I turn around and to my disappointment discover that the source of the commotion was two dreadlocked hooligans having a disagreement. Ah, well.

Suddenly the whole street seems terribly deserted. I move onward onto Park and walk up to 125th street, and then I arrive at the Metro-North train station.

I enter the wood-paneled waiting area as if moving from the past into the present. I am surrounded by young suburbanites: wives and husbands, sisters and brothers, and groups of friends who have come to the city for the day, all waiting for their train back home. They all look like my son, like his wife, like my grandchildren. They walk through East Harlem and see nothing more than loonies and bodegas…

I climb the steps to wait up on the platform, and from my seat I can see all the way down East 125th street. I try to picture Sophie and Annie playing jacks like I did, seventy-five years ago, on one of the street corners. Joey Caruso’s been ashes for 10 years. Can you imagine?

The train approaches the platform and the doors “ding” open like a perfumed elevator or a TV commercial. I step inside and take a seat by the window. The train takes off. We race through Harlem and fly over the river.

We enter the Bronx. Behind me I hear a little girl ask her mother, “Where are we? What is this place?” The mother answers, “I don’t know, sweetie. Looks like the middle of nowhere.”

Is that all that’s left of us?

Soon the train leaves the city entirely. We run alongside a highway and then plunge into the woods, where here and there you see a house and a neat backyard peeking out from the trees. Any of these houses could be my son’s. My grandchildren could be playing in any of those yards.

Who are we now? Are we still the same people in the forest as we were in East Harlem? Are we still Italian?

For me being Italian means jacks on the corner, Joey Caruso, white lace at Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, and buying our clothes from the Jewish tailors near Park Avenue. For my son being Italian means a cannoli for the kids, the occasional pasta dinner, and a vague feeling of contempt for establishments like Olive Garden. My grandchildren barely even know that they are Italian. They don’t even call me “Nonna.”

Where did we cease to become real Italians? Did leave our “Italian-ness” on the side of the highway, when our moving van sped out of the city? Did it fall out of our moving boxes as we carried them into our new suburban home? Did we lose it somewhere among the trees?

Part of me believes that we can only be real Italians in East Harlem. Our surroundings shape our identity. Now we are the Italians of Westchester, not the Italians of East Harlem. Something is lost, I think, in that transformation.

We cannot move back—my journey out of the city is irreversible. El Barrio is the barriera that bars our return.

The train arrives at my station. I step out and look over a parking lot filled with cars, and I see my son step out of his forest-green Volkswagen. I tell him that I don’t need any help down the steps—I made it to Harlem and back by myself, for goodness’ sake!—but he helps me anyway. A real gentleman, he is, and he’d better stay that way his whole life, God bless him.

Chinese Asylum Fraud in NYC

I stumbled across this article a while ago, and meant to post it.

Many, many Chinese immigrants file requests for asylum, and most of these immigrants are living in New York. Chinese immigrants file more requests for asylum nationwide than any other immigrant group in the country. And it turns out that New York denies a surprising number of Chinese asylum requests. Here’s why: a great number of these asylum requests are false. This practice is so prevalent that there is even an asylum fraud industry.

Here’s an excerpt from the article:

“The growth in the Chinese asylum industry over the past decade has coincided with an increase in Chinese migration to the United States and in the number of Chinese arriving on temporary visas, some with the intention of staying. Many have made New York City their primary destination. Between 2000 and 2011, the foreign-born Chinese population in New York City grew by a third, to more than 350,000 from about 261,500, and is now on the verge of overtaking Dominicans as the city’s largest immigrant group, according to New York’s City Planning Department.

“As an increasing number of Chinese have sought permanent immigration status here, asylum has become a popular way to achieve it: Asylum recipients are granted immediate permission to work and can apply for a green card a year later. Amid this rising demand, an ecosystem of law offices and other businesses specializing in asylum — not to mention a darker subculture of forgers and fake lawyers — has flourished in the crowded office buildings of Manhattan’s Chinatown and above storefronts along the bustling streets of Chinese enclaves in Flushing, Queens, and Sunset Park, Brooklyn.”

Here’s a link to the article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/nyregion/asylum-fraud-in-chinatown-industry-of-lies.html

What does everyone think? Is this an illegal, immoral (they’re all lying!) practice? Or is it justified, since even fraudulent requests can allow Chinese immigrants to settle permanently in the U.S. and have a better quality of life than they would in China?

An Unintentional Immigrant?

My mother immigrated from St. Petersburg, Russia to New York in 1993 after marrying my father, an American. Unlike those who move to the United States in search of economic opportunities or for a good education, my mother came without any plans or ambitions. In a sense, her immigration was unintentional and unpremeditated: she fell in love and followed her American husband back to his home.

My mother’s adventurous spirit carried her to a country which had enchanted her as a girl. She loved American authors such as James Fenimore Cooper, Jack London, and F. Scott Fitzgerald, whose novels promised beauty and freedom.

To be sure, these writers did little to prepare my mother for life in New York. She settled in suburban Westchester, in a culture that was unfamiliar and alien for someone who had grown up in the state-controlled Soviet economy. At first, American consumerism was overwhelming: for just one product, like hand soap, suddenly there were ten different brands to choose from! The most difficult adjustment was to America’s “car culture.” My mother had never learned to drive, since cars were a luxury in the Soviet Union. Driving was a difficult skill to learn, and to this day she still dislikes driving and misses her city sidewalks.

My mother eventually adjusted to life in the U.S, got her driver’s license, perfected her English, and became an adjunct professor of Russian. Her life had improved significantly: she moved from a small Russian apartment to 3-story American house, bought her own car, and now had enough income to send money back to her parents in St. Petersburg.

But despite these material gains, my mother became increasingly disappointed with America, for New York did not live up to the promise of Fitzgerald or Hemingway. Her disappointment was spiritual: suburban American values were incompatible with her urban, European sensibility. Certain parts of American culture and values still feel unnatural to her: Why does everybody walk around holding a Starbucks drink? Moreover, why is their coffee always so weak? Why do our neighbors strive to have the largest car or the largest house? Why must everyone drive? Where are the sidewalks? Becoming fluent in English and learning how to drive were not enough to make my mother feel at home. Though she has acclimated, she does not feel entirely comfortable. She will never become a suburban mom, as long as she remains a child of the urban Russian intelligentsia.

Though my mother dislikes these elements of life in New York, she has stayed nevertheless. She loves the United States for the natural beauty of its oceans, mountains, canyons and plains. She indulged this love by traveling all over the country, from Maine to Arizona. She embraced the country and it has rewarded her enthusiasm with rich experiences. But one immigrates not only to a physical landscape, but also to a culture and way of life. This latter, spiritual aspect of her move to a new country remains incomplete. 

My mother’s story of immigration is not yet finished. Her journey, which began unintentionally, has now become purposeful. She seeks a place where she feels more at home than in the States. Part of this search includes returning to an urban way of life, but part of it also means escaping American culture and values, which remain unnatural for her. My mother has begun to discover France. She feels that Parisians share her values: sidewalks, strolls, small cars, strong coffee and often pessimistic—or, to her, realistic—frankness. My mother is unlike those immigrants who settle permanently in America, or who earn some money before returning to their home country. For her, New York may prove a temporary stop en-route to somewhere else.

 

An ID for Illegal Immigrants?

Mayor DeBlasio plans to give ID to illegal immigrants living in New York City. Hopefully it will improve security and help give illegal immigrants access to city services. But can it work? Will illegal immigrants be bold enough to sign themselves up for this ID card? What does everyone think?

Here’s a link to the article, found in today’s Latin Times:

http://www.latintimes.com/undocumented-immigrants-will-receive-municipal-nyc-id-says-mayor-de-blasio-150955

And it turns out that DeBlasio’s idea is not a new one.  It has already been tested in Trenton, New Jersey:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/nyregion/17idcard.html?pagewanted=all

-Sasha

From Dr. Salvo’s Presentation

Hi, everyone!

Here’s a link to the latest edition of “The Newest New Yorkers,” the NYC Department of City Planning’s analysis of New York’s foreign-born population. Dr. Salvo used many of these graphs and charts in his presentation. I thought it would be useful to post this information in our General Discussion so that we can all access it easily.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/census/nny2013/nny_2013.pdf

-Sasha

Immigration’s Incomplete Dreams and Identities – Assignment 1

Gautam Ramasubramanian was born in 1995 in Mumbai, India. When he was four years old, he and his parents immigrated to the United States. For his parents, the United States had an almost fairy-tale appeal, as it seemed to offer the chance of a better life. Gautam’s father, an accountant, aspired to find a better job and to give his son an American education. This story of immigration is in fact two stories in one: the story of Gautam and the story of his parents. Gautam’s experience assimilating to American customs was very different from that of his parents. But despite these differences, both stories are similar in that they exemplify some of the disappointments of immigration. Gautam’s father was unable to realize his hopes of a more successful career. As a consequence of being foreign-born and U.S.-raised, Gautam struggles to stay true to his Indian heritage and is uncertain about his own identity. Whether he is  Indian or American remains perplexingly unclear.

In 1993, six years before the family’s move, Gautam’s uncle had immigrated from India to Flushing. The uncle worked for the State Bank of India and was transferred to the Bank’s U.S. branch. The uncle’s successful career in New York made Gautam’s father optimistic about finding work in the United States. Unfortunately, the father’s experience developed in sharp contrast to the uncle’s. The father had trouble finding a high-ranking, well-paying job in the U.S., since American employers did not trust his Indian education and experience in accounting. He was forced to re-train, which put him a step behind where he would have been in India. He once said that he regretted the move, since in India he would have risen higher in his career. But despite this disappointment, Gautam’s father chose to remain in America for the sake of his only child’s education.

It was in Gautam’s education where his father’s hopes were realized. Gautam started elementary school in New York and did very well: he was a thoughtful and diligent pupil who prospered in the American school system. Moreover, since he arrived in New York when he was very young, Gautam had no difficulty in adopting an American lifestyle. Still very young and impressionable, he assimilated to American customs easily and naturally.

Gautam’s parents, in contrast, were more conscious than he of the cultural adjustments they had to make. Luckily his parents were able to avoid many of the difficulties of assimilation by settling in Flushing’s Indian neighborhood. Not only did they have relatives near by—Gautam’s uncle, aunt and cousins—but they also belonged to a tight-knit community that maintained many Indian traditions. Flushing has an Indian temple and stores selling Indian food, which helped Gautam’s parents feel at home.

Even though Gautam’s parents lived in an Indian community, they nevertheless abandoned some Indian customs in favor of Western ones. After all, even an ethnic enclave cannot remain entirely insulated from mainstream American culture. For example, rather than eating and sleeping on the floor, Gautam’s family began to use tables, chairs and beds. Along with this came a difference in eating habits: utensils appeared on the table, and what was formerly eaten with the hands now submitted to fork and knife. In addition, English replaced Tamil as the main language spoken at home. Throughout all these changes, Gautam’s parents felt no real loss. Even in their Indian neighborhood his parents were eager to become less foreign and more American. These were common changes in lifestyle that other Indians in the community had already made.

Assimilation was most difficult when it came to the family’s last name—or, rather, last names. Surnames in South India are passed down differently than surnames in the United States. In the West, last names are traditionally passed down though the men in the family so that one family shares the same surname. Certain South Indians, however, derive their surnames from their father’s first name—or husband’s first name, for married women. Ramasubramanian is Gautam’s father’s first name. While Gautam and his mother are surnamed Ramasubramanian, the father is actually surnamed Sundram, since Sundram is the grandfather’s first name. The fact that one family had different surnames complicated life in the United States. Consider, for example, what would happen when Gautam’s father picked his son up from school. Gautam’s father was not Mr. Ramasubramanian. Western schoolteachers found this perplexing: How could father and his own son have a different last name?

This problem was remedied two years ago when Gautam’s parents became U.S. citizens and changed their last name to Ayer. Ayer is the name of their family line and comes from their distant ancestors. Perhaps this name represented a way to stay true to their Indian heritage. Or perhaps, now that Gautam’s parents were citizens, this new name was a symbol of complete assimilation.

Gautam, however, did not change his name from Ramasubramanian to Ayer. At that time Gautam was becoming more interested in his Indian roots, and keeping his original last name seemed a way to hold onto his Indian identity. As a child, Gautam was teased for his unusual and very long last name. Now this name became a source of pride. Gautam also began to lament the loss of his native Tamil, a language which he had failed to master.

Unfortunately, Gautam finds it difficult to hold onto what remains of his Indian heritage. His Tamil is so poor that becoming fluent in the language would require an immense amount of work. Gautam also says that it will only be a matter of time before he will change his last name to Ayer, since it is problematic to have a last name that differs from that of his parents.

For Gautam’s parents, assimilation to Western customs required a conscious effort, but now they feel comfortable being Americanized. Gautam’s experience of assimilation was the reverse: his assimilation was not deliberate, and unlike his parents he does not want to be Americanized. He strives to retain whatever fragments of Indian culture and traditions still remain in his family. Consequently, Gautam straddles two countries and is not exactly sure where he belongs. He does not consider himself Indian, nor does he consider himself a New Yorker. Immigration has left Gautam incomplete, since he is neither entirely Indian nor entirely American. In a way, Gautam’s father is incomplete as well, since he is unable to reach his full potential in his career. His aspirations remain unfulfilled.

This feeling of incompleteness which Gautam shares with his father is an unfortunate consequence of immigration. That is not to say, though, that immigration did not have its advantages. Gautam was indeed able to benefit from the American system of education, and his acceptance into Macaulay is clear evidence of that fact. And perhaps Gautam’s struggle to define himself can also be seen in a positive light. The incompleteness that he feels may in fact be the starting point for a self-reflective journey, traversing the intersections between foreign roots and present circumstances, which non-immigrants rarely have an opportunity to explore.

Sasha Whittaker

Though I was born in Northern Westchester and have lived my whole life in the United States, I have always embraced my Russian heritage. I am only half-Russian: my mother moved here from St. Petersburg in 1993. My father grew up in the suburbs of Concord, New Hampshire, and his mother (my grandmother) immigrated from Northern Italy to Brooklyn when she was a child. His father (my grandfather) had been an American for many generations–his ancestry traces back to the Mayflower Pilgrims (perhaps, the very first American immigrants!), and he is distantly related to William Bradford, the governor of the Plymouth Colony.

I feel that I straddle two different worlds, Russian and American. As a result, I am not sure exactly which I identify with the most. I am beginning to see that many New Yorkers also possess this “dual identity,” and I hope that learning more about the origins of other New Yorkers will help me better understand myself.