The Arts in New York City

MHC Seminar 1, Professor Casey Henry

Page 10 of 11

Kara Walker

Kara Walker in her actual art does not use many colors and generally all the people portrayed are silhouettes.  We are forced to look at aspects of the person, such as shape, hair, facial features etc. Because of this simplicity she manages to portray stereotypes strongly. For example, in her art titled  “Mississippi Mud” we  have no choice but to stereotype the child. Through her use of stereotypes she also depicts racism, the south and what actually went down there, treatment of women etc. Together the stereotype and history shown makes her work stick around in our mind thus forcing one to address the stereotype and the history that comes along with it.

With that in mind, obviously there are many different stereotypes that exist today.  Often they are subtly conveyed in images.  A very dangerous stereotype is that the successful person is one who earned a lot of money and has a high power career.   In the attached image, Sheryl Sandberg, the COO of Facebook is deemed “successful.” The article itself writes about her “mission to reboot feminism.” However, a glance at this cover photo and one gets the feeling she is successful because she has an extremely high position and earns a lot of money. It is true that Sheryl Sandberg is very successful. However, I think it is harmful when it is conveyed as the ultimate success. Most will not become really wealthy or have positions such as Sheryl’s. Yet, if the expectation is that earning money and having a powerful career is making it in life, and one does not accomplish that, then they will feel like the ultimate failure and become depressed. Therefore, I think that “success” in our society should be redefined. 

 

Kara Walker Post – Blog # 4

 

With Kara Walker, the message resonating through this single piece is only one in a kingdom of millions. Walker, with most of her art, uses silhouettes and plays with the limits of ambiguity and everything but. She paints a scene with enough detail to understand the concept she is trying to convey, but leaves space for detailed interpretation. It sometimes become difficult to decipher which limb belongs to which character, but this becomes a clever tactic that feeds personalization. In the image above titled, Cover of my Negro Novella, it resonates a feeling of exhaustion, It pulls the viewers into its time and place, and allows them to physically feel the torment of the past. Walker often tampers with landscapes and this is the prime example. The man (below the other), seems as of he is trudging up an exponentially steep slope. The man above him, also black, pulls his arm back, as if to remind his fellow negro that the only position they must remain in is to be inferior than the whites. His face speaks volumes; he looks up through the crack of the walls to something grander. The very idea of autonomy keeps his soul alive, as if enslavement fails to trouble him if he’s still connected to something bigger than both the prisoner and the jailer.

 

 

 

Edwin Forbes was an extremely influential artist during the American Civil War. In order to portray the time objectively as possible, he was known to draw anything and everything in its most natural state. In the image above, Edwin sketched the shabby exterior of a southern cabin used by the house servants and farm-hands. The house looks as if it will collapse, as if it lacks a proper foundation to support its weight. This, however, is contrasted by the spirt exerted from its inhabitants. Thousands of soldiers recalled with immense pleasure the kindness they received from the blacks in the south. The sick and wounded soldiers would receive not only love but pies and pastries from the old ‘aunties’;no one would be turned away. The liveness of the enslaved would be so impactful, where the town depicted above would radiate, not from eloquent houses or architecture, but from the dense souls living in it. Both Forbes and Walker speak about similar times using two drastically different art styles and manners. They, however, uniformly project the concept of breaking stereotypes and bringing the truth to light.

 

Kara Walker Post – Blog # 4

Blog # 4

https://www.rd.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/01/01-statue-of-liberty-facts.jpg

 

Kara Walker’s exhibit is one that has to be observed with a close attention to detail. One is not able to point out all of the elements that make it up her artwork with a first look. Kara Walker’s art is made up of many different components that are essential to the full meaning of her intended message. One piece in particular that I at first overlooked is titled Slaughter of the Innocents (They Might be Guilty of Something), 2017. Looking more closely at this piece, i was able to point out both adult and children figures. What called my attention the most, however, was what was happening to the children. In this piece by Walker, children are hunted down and murdered by some of the adult figures. In another part of the piece, a female figure is show holding a baby, perhaps her very own dead baby.  Kara Walker makes extensive use of silhouettes against a white background in her work to get her message across.

The image I chose for this blog depicts the Statue of Liberty,  a standing figure that for years has inspired many to flee from their countries and dream of a better life in America. The meaning behind this figure is powerful; It conveys feelings of freedom, liberty and opportunity like never before. The statue of Liberty serves as a welcome symbol to those who get to see it, but if we think about it, to what extent are those values carried through today in our country?  In the poem titled The New Colossus by Emma Lazarus, people are encouraged to believe that the United states is a country of new opportunity. The lines below portray the idea of acceptance in America, and yet for years the United States has battled with problems concerning immigration.

 

“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

In the year 1931, for example, in the midst of the Great Depression, many Americans blamed immigrants for taking their jobs. Even today, in the year 2017, we are able to witness just how divided the nation is on the topic of immigration. We hear talks about deporting illegal immigrants, placing bans on travel for Muslims and even the construction of a wall that would contradict rather than promote the values expressed by the Statue of Liberty.

Kara Walker’s exhibit

Kara Walker aims to take back symbols and stereotypes of Antebellum South with appropriation in her art. The black people are portrayed with the common stereotypes of big noses, flat profiles and bigger lips. Specifically, she depicts black females on the ground, usually with a snake near the body, usually in distress as a white man is above her.   This use of symbols and stereotypes is not meant to be deconstructive, but rather constructive in portraying the cruel and harsh reality of slaves during this time. Rather than look at racism through soft scope, Walker takes her art straight to the hard truth in hopes to change the way American’s look at slavery.

 

The image above is an advertisement from the 1950s for the stereotypical housewife. Where it was sanctioned that a woman’s only purpose was to be enslaved to her family. In this ad, they call it “Specialist in Proper Family Nourishment,” giving the illusion that it is a real job when really all this woman is allowed to do all day is cook, clean, and provide for her children. This stereotype is trademarked by a perfect looking woman, with kempt hair and perfect makeup. She even has a perfect manicure. She is also depicted carrying three large helpings of food. Obviously, this stereotype has been beyond damaging in woman’s strife for equal rights and while we have been moving away from images like this, woman continue to face disparities in the real world with equal wages and fair treatment.

Blog # 3: Florine Stettheimer

Prior to watching John Berger’s “Ways of Seeing Episode 3,” I viewed works of art only after doing research. When I look at a work of art, it is important for me to have some background knowledge on the subject in order to feel comfortable in a discussion setting. The reason behind doing research stems from my experience working at a museum. As a museum intern, I was responsible for guiding museum visitors around the museum. I, as a result, had to learn about the museum exhibits and to have an idea of what each section focused on. Watching the video, however, helped me understand that looking at artwork does not require having prior knowledge on the idea being presented. Berger emphasizes the idea of making detailed observations when looking at pieces of artwork and this is the approach i took for viewing Florine Stettheimer’s work.

While observing the artwork by Stettheimer, something that stood out to me was the floral designs she included in many of her art pieces. One in particular that caught my attention was the piece titled Family Portrait II, 1933, in which Stettheimer centered three flowers with her family gathered around. When looked at more closely, the foreground of the painting also depicts a large floral figure on which the three flowers in the center seem to rest on. The flowers in this painting are most likely symbolic of a certain aspect in the family of Stettheimer, for they are set to be the focal point of the artwork rather than her family members themselves. From the way the people were dressed in this particular painting, I was able to infer that Stettheimer came from a wealthy family. The women in the painting wear elaborate dresses and as Berger pointed out in his video, an attention to detail in a painting most often shows the social status or wealth of the people being depicted. The painting dates back to 1933, a period in which the country was still under the effects of the Great Depression. Despite the economic burdens of the time period, nevertheless, Stettheimer portrayed her family surrounded by fancy curtains and wearing clothing most closely associated with those of the upper class at the time. Something else I noticed as I looked at Stettheimer’s art is that her work is abstract. One example is the piece titled Family Portrait I, 1915 in which Stettheimer once again makes extensive use of floral design around the members of her family. Stettheimer takes on a modernist approach to her work by making use of symbols. In Portrait of Myself, 1923, Stettheimer appears to be blooming from a flower.

One final observation I made from the paintings by Stettheimer is that she was an artist who focused on family throughout her artwork. She has several portraits of herself in the collection showcased by the museum and she also included friends of hers in her work. Her sister must have been a strong figure in her life, given that she dedicates a portrait to her in the piece titled Portrait of My Sister, Ettie Stettheimer.

A Doll’s House Pt. 2 Discussion

Review: A Doll’s House Part 2 met my expectations for what I was looking forward to see from a continuation of the original three act play A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen. I was surprised, in a good way, to see the extensive use of comedy in this play. It was definitely a surprise to be able to connect with the cast of the play through continuous laughter but I think the whole purpose of the use of comedy in A Doll’s House Part 2 was exactly this, to help the audience of the twenty first century relates with the message being showcased. In A Doll’s House, which dates back to over one hundred years ago, Henrik Ibsen brings about an idea that for the time period was considered radical and out of the normal for a woman to do. Likewise, the playwrights of A Doll’s House Part 2 made sure to center the message of the new play on something that today’s audience would consider perhaps unusual about marriage and its meaning.

The play A Doll’s House Part 2 raises the question of whether or not marriage is the right step to take when two people fall in love. According to Nora, one of the main characters of the play, marriage is unnecessary. Over the 15 year she was away on her own, without the company of her husband and her children, she formulated the idea that marriage was another way of saying incarceration. In series of arguments with Anne Mare, Nora brings about the idea that people are better off without marriage, which not only forces people to be together despite apparent changes in the way they feel over time, but that also promotes the idea that the sole purpose of people in life is to find happiness next to another person. Nora defends her argument by proposing a new idea that she hopes will catch on with the world soon: finding happiness with yourself. What is intriguing about this play in particular is that it is carried out in a serious of back and forth arguments. Most of the play is presented with Nora arguing why she took the decision to leave and what she thinks the world should learn from now on about the idea of marriage. There is an alternative reason as to why she returns to her old home than to just explain why she left in the first place, but after the play is over, the audience is left with the task of formulating their own idea on marriage and where they stand on the spectrum based on what Nora and Torvald bring to the table.

 

 

 

Doll House Pt 2

The play did a really good job of making it difficult to fully agree with or be on the side of any one character. While watching the play I felt that I could see both sides to any argument. The main character at times came off as extremely strong and resourceful and at other times irrational and selfish.

While watching the play I could feel myself being easily convinced of different character’s opinions and views on marriage and at times my allegiances would change so quickly that at one point I felt confused and frustrated at the whole discourse. This I believe is a success because that allowed me to feel the same confusion and frustration that the characters in the play felt, for example when the wife was on the floor with the ripped contract and the husband was on the chair with a bashed in the head.

The play to me didn’t serve to answer any questions but really raised many and sort of went on to say is there an answer? Then they sort of made some jokes about it shrugged it off and said “well if there is one it sure is hard!” Then laughed it off and said “Life goes on”.

That kind of frustrates me but at the same time I think that works in this case because the play is almost I would say about frustration.

The part that stuck with me the most was when she said “Just being with people is so hard.” I liked how she made it so general as to refer to relationships with other conscious beings and not just marriage. It kind of highlights that the problem isn’t as much a matter of gender or society or all sorts of other potential sources of blame, but rather just a part of being human.

We enjoy company but to be in company with someone is to compromise with each other to varying degrees. Difficult even without a binding contract!

Prompt for November 22

What do you make of the intersection between art, commerce, advertising, and fashion as touched on in these articles? Feel free to bring in additional articles, images, or video, or write about a compelling ad (for a fashion brand or otherwise) you saw recently.

Prompt for November 20

Write about the common aspects of both sculptors’ (Michelangelo & Rodin) work, or what you felt was unique about each.Also feel free to contemplate the “sculptural” aspects of Mapplethorpe’s work, or the resonances between Mapplethorpe’s framing of subjects and Michelangelo/Rodin’s.

Prompt for November 13

Write a blog post about the world portrayed in the Mean Streets—the moral paradoxes of its characters, and the details of the world they inhabit, and so on. What makes it compelling? Alternately, discuss what is similar, or different, about the gritty reality portrayed in the Ghostface song, or how music and film present these experiences differently.
« Older posts Newer posts »