Prof. Laura Kolb, Baruch College

First World Problems on Another Level

Playboy (On View)

Although art as a concept is something that is familiar to us on a primordial level – when we see ‘art’ in a museum, for example, we call it art because we somehow just know that it is – but it’s jarring to realize that if someone were to ask you out of the blue to define art, you would have a terribly difficult time trying to articulate your opinion.  In the case of Martha Rosler’s Playboy (On View), some people may not consider this work as art.  I disagree – in this series of works, Rosler produced remarkable innovation through the use of photomontages.  She juxtaposed images of the Vietnam War, an issue of foreign policy that was full of contention and controversy, with the image of a beautiful naked woman from the American Playboy Magazine, which was symbolic of the sexual revolution occurring at home in the 60s.  It’s a mimesis in the most disturbing sense; it imitates life abroad, in a world alien most Americans at the time and still to this day, in a way that brings attention to the horrific atrocities that went on there, much of them due to the actions of the Americans.  It’s also an imitation of life at home, too, providing commentary on the male gaze that so many women rebelled against in the time period.  In that way, it’s avant-garde – the viewer is made uncomfortable by what is displayed in the picture.

This work is political because it sought to either pose an uncomfortable truth to its viewers who were ignorant of the domestic and international state of affairs at the time, therefore raising awareness, or at least remind the viewers of their comfortable position as Americans while a brutal war was being fought in Vietnam.  Its intended message was that “American prosperity” came at the expense of other people as a result of imperialism for the sake of a free-market capitalist economy.  I don’t think it’s Rosler intended for it to have any other effect on the viewer except to make them become self-aware of their own position, both as an American and as a citizen of the world.  It wanted to point out how Americans had been essentially complicit in what its government and military were doing in another foreign country that many believed they had no business being in.

When we think of art, we tend to simply think of paintings and the like.  However, the experimental method of creating a photomontage helped to portray the situation in a whole new light – that while women were modeling nude for a magazine catered to men, journalists on the other side of the world were capturing the most dismal horrors known to humanity through their cameras.  The photomontages made things seem much more real and palpable to a viewer in the 60s.

2 Comments

  1. Karina Chiqui Narvaez

    Hello Ayah,

    Wonderful work! I would like to say your explanation of why this piece of art qualifies as avant-garde is amazing, because it ties in what avant-garde means and how this piece of art achieves that. You thoroughly explained how this work of art is avant-gard because it makes the viewer feel uncomfortable as they view the image but it also challenges the viewer’s cultural conceptions about art. The photo of a Playboy model juxtaposed with images of the Vietnam War really leaves the viewer questioning how these two could possibly have a connection. I, myself, had a difficult time until you mentioned this was in the 60’s during the sexual revolution. You did a great job of explaining the content in the photo and make a connection as to why this relates to avant-garde art. Great job!

    Karina Chiqui

  2. Yusef Rahimzada

    This is such an interesting picture to choose, this reminds me of R. Mutt’s “Fountain”. Questioning what is and what isn’t art is up to the viewer and this piece is quite avant garde with its use of negative space. The people in the scene are not on the floor or even in an environment they are simply floating. this allows the size of the images determine the distance between the people instead of using a ground line. The sexual imagery is striking and attention capturing, and makes the viewer somewhat uncomfortable. I believe this contributes to your point about how the artist wanted the public to be uncomfortable by her art, raising them to action. I think you did a great job explaining the connection between the time period of the 1960’s , sexuality, and the Vietnam war. Good work, keep it up.

    Yusef Rahimzada

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *