Separation and the Lack Thereof

The popular imagination has long been captivated by such convenient designations, and, more than occasionally, succumbs to polemics offered by men who claim special insight into the true nature of duality – prophets and ‘charismatics’ who claim to know how and when the world will end.  In the past decade and change, LaHaye and Jenkins, authors of the Left Behind series, have been premier gurus of apocalyptic thought, profiting immensely on Americans’ fascination with and fear of the long-awaited collective death.  Their books’ incredible success – second in all-time sales only to the Bible upon which they draw, reports have said ­– reveals the depth of our entanglement with the archetypal forces that drive myths of ending.  In Left Behind, radical dualism is on full display, and that which is deemed ‘evil’ in any way is meaningless in the eyes of the elect: Though time is ending, it is not being transcended.  Rather, the reader is left with a cosmos divided, and an implicit agreement with reality in its present, fractured state.

This entry was posted in October, October 12, Sam Barnes and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Separation and the Lack Thereof

  1. Perhaps, in the apocalyptic scenario they diagnosed as having three distinct motivations, there lies a fourth, seemingly contradictory vein: the longing for unification of self and world, space and time, and God and his creation; the apocalypse as a bridge between subject and object.

    Wow. I want to think about that Subject and Object part a bit more..it feels like you’re on to something big regarding the nature of dualism and fundamentalism as it applies to apocalyptic thought…impressive…

  2. oops i meant to quote you..my first paragraph is your writing..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *