Doomsday Fest

FYI, coming in December.  If you have something to submit, there is time before the deadline:

http://doomsdayfilmfest.com/

Posted in Lee Quinby | Leave a comment

Comments on Posts

The insightful posts about this week’s readings bode well for another lively discussion in class. I particularly like the fact that your examples illustrate such a clear range from religious to secular forms of apocalypticism in American society. As Charles Strozier points out, drawing on Richard Hofstadter’s classic essay, “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” such tendencies toward paranoia and conspiracy belief characterize much in this culture. If they have moved ever onward to include media and everyday life, it is in part because of the internet’s capacity to spread such views widely and with the appearance of credibility.

I also find it noteworthy to see your explorations of how these views can be analyzed effectively by citing your own tendencies (at times) to experience some of the symptoms of apocalypticism, albeit in benign form. Denial of it altogether might possibly be a “bad sign.” One of the reasons I embarked on the study of apocalyptic belief, way back when, was to try to understand my own utopian/millennialist leanings and an inclination toward seeing other political views in a reductive way that smacked of dualism.

Equally rewarding are the ways in which your responses gesture toward alternative modes of thought, as Sam points out in his conclusion about an end that “constantly flows around us.” So too Grecia’s links between Gandhi’s critique of unChristlike Christians, the story of the big hat, and the elevation of war as a God-sanctioned practice.

I want to make special note of both Andreas’ and Mac’s posts because they have engaged in the kind of textual analysis that I want to see in your research papers. In each case, they have taken a key element of the analysis that the readings provide and then expanded on it (as Andreas did with Strozier’s seals) or criticized it (as Mac did with Jones). What happens in this process is a more concrete argument that gives a readers something to latch onto in response—and thus encourages further discussion.

Posted in Lee Quinby, October, October 19 | Leave a comment

The Social Network, Strozier, and Scientific Sloppiness

Having recently seen The Social Network, Charles B. Strozier’s essay, “The Apocalyptic Other,” was eerily pertinent.  The film, which focuses on two lawsuits brought against Mark Zuckerberg (played by Jesse Eisenberg) – one from two Harvard classmates who allege that he stole their idea for the social networking site Facebook and another from his former CFO and best friend whose shares were watered down from 35 to .003% – depicts Napster founder Sean Parker (played with surprising ability by Justin Timberlake) as a paranoid egomaniac.  Strozier’s link between paranoia, fundamentalism, and the apocalyptic mindset are all themes that the film addressed in an impactful way.  The film seemed to represent a sort of zeitgeisty, of-the-moment depiction of post-millennial attitudes towards innovation and technology.  I found that in the film, both Zuckerberg and Parker are figures who operate on paranoid tendencies, although Parker’s characterization is much more explicit.  The paranoid mindset is pervasive, and in the contemporary world, perhaps more associated with concerns of modernity than with any link to religious fanatacism.  But the type of paranoia that Strozier expounds on is inseperable from paranoia that is not borne from religious beliefs.  I found his case study of Harriet to be highly magnetic and interesting – it too reminded me of one of the most effective depictions of paranoia I have ever seen onscreen, William Friedkin’s 2005 film Bug, based on a stage play by Tracy Letts.  Paranoia is fascinating and incredibly varied, but seems to spring from base psychological constructs that are often similar between cases.  His reference to White Noise also brought to mind our own contemporary tendency to normalize a socially acceptable undercurrent of paranoia in our daily lives.  It seems that the uncertainty of modern times and the ever increasing presence of globalism allows for underlying suspicion about the larger workings of the world around us, even without tangible evidence.  In 2010, paranoia is built in – not attained.

Continue reading

Posted in Mac Warren, October, October 19 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Seven Seals of Fundamentalism

“And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven….”

Book of Revelation 8:1

I’d like to use this post to make a convenient analysis of the above image, in light of Strozier’s essay “Opening the Seven Seals of Fundamentalism”. At once an obviously inflammatory and shockingly derisive image, this particular banner can be found on the streets of Harlem, heralding its citizens to “The Blood of Jesus World Ministry Church”. Although I do confess myself to be right-wing leaning, when I confronted this particular glowing banner in Harlem on the way to a friend’s apartment, even I was appalled. Aside from the fact that it represented a somewhat unique dissent from the black community towards the momentous occasion of the first African American president, it also fits in well with the mindset of Fundamentalism, particularly Christian fundamentalism.  As I was reading Strozier’s essay which pointed out 7 key “seals” of the fundamentalist mindset, I immediately conjured up this image in my mind, and began automatically making mental comparisons, seeing this banner for what it was: manifestations of the paranoia of the fundamentalist mindset. Let’s start in order with the seven seals Strozier mentions, and see how many we can apply to this particular image. Violence. Violence is written all over this image. From the phrase “Blood of Christ against Obama”, to the association of Obama with Taliban Muslims, to the stark white and red imagery used—everything here points in the direction of a violent action against Obama. Time. Yes, albeit small, we do have a mention of time—as the date when Obama was Elected (Nov. 4th 2008) Perhaps this is a nod towards kairotic time, in which time is always running out. Perhaps this pastor addresses the urgency of removal of Obama from office, and by posting the date there, he is connoting apocalyptic time; claiming that this event surely will be the one which brings about the end. Revenge. This one is the most evident. BLOOD OF CHRIST against Obama… What else could this mean, if not that Christ (and his sacred followers) would exact Revenge on Obama (involving the fundamentalists’ favorite liquid: blood) This whole church is obviously predicated on God’s revenge on the “Taliban Muslims” and our current president. Paraonoia. Aaah, this is a good one. The concept of Paranoia is especially applicable due to the evident irrationality of what this image suggests. This image has it that Obama was an “illegal Taliban Muslim” (yes there are rumors that Obama is a Muslim, however I don’t believe that he was part of the Taliban has any serious root in academic discussion) and that he was ILLEGALLY elected president, confirming this particular group’s deep-seated paranoia that Obama and the Muslims have it in for them. Somehow, some group of Taliban terrorists managed to elect on of their own to the presidency, in order to enact the devil’s work, and cause the poor people of Harlem to suffer. Something like that…whatever it is, surely it qualifies as paranoia. Survivalism. I don’t believe we have any immediate evidence of that here. Moving on…. The elect. Obviously the congregates of this church, as well as the Pastor, recognize themselves to be a part of this elect (whose blood, along with Jesus’ is against Obama) which will be cleansed through the elimination of Obama from presidency, and bringing about the end. It is the job of this congregation to enact their endist fantasies, so that they might be the elect which is eventually favored and taken to heaven during the rapture. And finally…Redemption. Perhaps the white contrasted with the red is symbolic of the hope associated with the Blood of Christ against Obama. That when all the bloodshed is all said and done, the hope exists of a new world-cleansed of Obama and purified by Christ, for those who—like the members of this congregation—recognized Obama as the antichrist he was, and fought against his will. Another aspect which isn’t exactly covered by the seven-seals categorization of the fundamentalist mindset is the dualistic thinking. This marquee is certainly indicative of a sort of dualistic thinking and moral absolutism amongst its constituents. Those who profess these beliefs believe Obama to be the antichrist, the evil one, to represent all that is evil—whereas they are the pure who have recognized the truth, and who will bring the Blood of Christ to bear on their enemies. The dualism between good and evil, right and wrong, Christ and Antichrist and the moral absolutism of knowing what is right and what is wrong (as a moral God would) is fully present in this particular strain of the fundamentalist mindset.

Disclaimer: I didn’t pick this topic to address because I have these militant views against Obama. Yes, I did not Vote for Obama, nor do I support many of his views, but my disagreements with him end there. I definitely don’t believe he is the antichrist.

Posted in Andreas Apostolopoulos, October, October 19 | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

War in the End of Time

Last week, I questioned why people fight until the very end even when they know it won’t make a difference. What is the point of one last act of violence when peace is just one step away? In this week’s readings I found an answer, or so I think. In the essay by Charles B. Strozier, “The Apocalyptic Other”, Strozier says that those who commit those actions do so because they believe that they are part of a bigger cause that will somehow make the world better, whether it is the entire world or an individual’s world.

The world is not full of Jokers causing acts of violence for no particular reason other than the thrill of it. There are always motives, and in the case of the End of the World, the motive is to bring Salvation closer and to give God one more reason to save him or her, or them. It reminds of an episode of a TV in which a character wanted his girlfriedn to make him a beautiful hat so that God would take notice of him on Earth. This acts of extremism is that big hat that is there to attract God. Every act of terrorism in the name of God is trying to achieve what the hat is trying to achieve, except it doesn’t create attention it destroys humanity. It makes humanity less worthy of saving. Precisely because of this personal notion, I am not a big fan of A Glorious Appearing, because I think that war until the End should not be rewarded. Who is the real worshipper of his or her God: the one who kills people in God’s name or the one who one good deed without looking for any credit? Ghandi once said, ““I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” He admired Christianity and the idea behind it, but throughout the last two millenia, very few Christians have lived the true spirit of Christ. Christianity has become an excuse rather than a way of life, as have other religions for those few extremist that look for a “cause” to their latest acts of violence or intolerance.

Posted in Grecia Huesca, October, October 19 | Leave a comment