Science and Technology of New York City

This is another article, presented by the New York Times, that discuses the competition between Bloomberg and the EPA. Compared to the Brooklyn papers, this is a more credible source and there is no bias in this article. They also mention the plan that Bloomberg is planning to implement to avoid the “superfund site” stigma. […]

[Read more →]

This article presents the debate on how to fix the Gowanus canal from both the perspective of the EPA and Bloomberg. While I did expect this article to be biased, it is not. Rather, it presents both sides while presenting the author’s takes on each respective side. http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/32/21/32_21_mm_gowanus.html – Jessen Thomas

[Read more →]

This website focuses on current projects undertaken on the local level to fix the canal. This is particularly useful in studying the relationship between the canal and the neighborhood. Of course, being a website that is supporting the change of the canal, this is very biased. http://www.gowanuscanalconservancy.org/ee/ – Jessen Thomas

[Read more →]

This article is designed for public educational purposes. As a result, it cannot be considered as an unbiased source, the information has been simplified to appeal to a larger audience. However, the idea of using a kite to map possible solutions for the canal brings the idea of using fun activities to engage the support […]

[Read more →]