Author: Vincent Gangemi (Page 1 of 2)

Review of Scott Bradlee’s Postmodern Jukebox

“Scott Bradlee’s Postmodern Jukebox” is a must see show with delightful music. Its fresh take on new songs can bring even the most passive music fans into a metaphorical time machine to appreciate the music styles of the 20s, 30s, and 40s.

Singer Casey Abrams, formerly known for finishing in sixth place in the tenth season of American Idol, does a fantastic job of bringing alive the styles of Louis Armstrong and Bing Crosby. Haley Reinhart, known for finishing third in the tenth season of American Idol, also does a great job of breathing the life of artists like Billie Holiday into songs like Iggy Azalea’s 2014 hit, “Fancy.” Moreover, it was also a nifty experience to see the performers, and even many audience members, dressed in period clothes.

20151114_204854

Sporting more modest roles in the show were Robyn Adele Anderson and Joey Cook. The pair sang a few solo songs, but mainly served as back-up vocalists for Casey Abrams and Haley Reinhart. The were fantastic in their own right. They were great at complimenting Abrams and Reinhart, and their select songs were spectacular. In particular, Cook’s rendition of the Plain White T’s hit “Hey There Delilah” performed in an early 1920s styles with an ukulele.

As an additional source of rhythm, the Postmodern Jukebox featured tap dancer Sarah Reich. It was truly breathtaking to see her use her tap dancing skills and keep in time rhythmically with the music. It is clear she gave it her all despite showing little signs of being winded.

One could also argue Tim Kubart, credited as “tambourine guy,” was also a performer. His role in the show was a little confusing. During a few songs he would come on stage, play the tambourine, and dance around a bit. I suppose his role was a combination of comic relief and to keep the audience excited and enthusiastic. By that measure, Kubart did a very good job. It was always quite funny to see him dance around.

However, the real shining star of the show was the band. The band, consisting of Ben Golder-Novick on the saxophone, Rick Becker on the trombone, Adam Kubota on the standup bass, and Stanley “Chip” Thomas on the drums, made the theater come to life with music. Even when the singers sang off key, which they rarely did, the band was able to pick up the slack and still make the performance quiet amazing.

20151114_201044

On that note, my one complaint would be the few songs in the middle of the performance where Casey Abrams plays the bass instead of Adam Kubota. I am not quiet sure why Bradlee and his team chose to make him do that. Perhaps because it is an interesting visual to see someone play an upright bass while singing, which admittedly it was. However, Abrams singing was lackluster during these segments. It is clear, juggling both his vocals and a complex instrument is too complicated for even someone of his caliber and talent.

The Postmodern Jukebox was only complimented by the venue. One of their first performances of the tour, and the one I attended, was held at St. George Theater located on the North Shore of Staten Island. The St. George Theater is a smaller theater that was built in 1929. There are two reasons why the theater helped the performers immensely. First, as previously mention the theater is comparably small. The theater seats a little less than two-thousand people. When it was first built, the balcony and mezzanine originally had 1,400 seats and the orchestra section had another 1,600; about two thirds of those remain today. This allowed the evening to have an intimate relationship between the show and the audience. Even the seats in the far back could clearly see the spectacle and feel the energy of the stage. Second, the St. George Theater has a vintage setting, which is fitting for the music. This is because the theater was actually built during the period the performers are attempting to recreate. The theater has velvet seats, gilded balconies, and grand staircases. A truly spectacular choice when compared to the larger, more modern theaters the Postmodern Jukebox could have easily preformed in.

259305

Musician, pianist, and arranger Scott Bradlee and his performance group, the Postmodern Jukebox, had their start on YouTube. Their videos trended for taking modern pop songs and rearranging them into vintage styles, as if they had of been written back in the early 1900s. Their most popular video, a rendition of Miley Cyrus’ “We Can’t Stop,” received 14.5 million views. Know this, I personally was a bit skeptical. It is not a simple transition from producing 5 minutes clips into a two-hour show.

Luckily, the group managed to make the performance look natural and effortless. The energy within the crowd was invariable constantly on high. I believe this is partially because of his humble start on YouTube. What I believe is that this gave the performers a cult following of sorts. Personally, I knew little about the group before the show, but I would imagine most of the crowd were fans from YouTube originally who over time grew to love the group. This was clear by their enthusiasm and willingness to dress in clothes of the respective era. Fans of the Postmodern Jukebox are certainly a tight-nit community, and Scott Bradley should be proud of this.

 

Behind the Gyrations, Hip-Shakes, and Jolts

Modern dance and music as we know it began in early 1920s Harlem, New York. This period, known as the Harlem Renaissance, gave us dance moves like the Charleston and the Jitterbug. There are many inspiring and interesting stories about the growth of African American dance culture, but perhaps none more inspirational than Pearl Primus.

Pearl Primpearl primusus is considered to be the first African American modern dancer. She, like most other African American dancers, used the art form to express the social and political hardships for African Americans in the United States. Primus did research on dance in Africa and included an in-depth study of African dance traditions in her performances.

Today, Choreographer Kyle Abraham continues this strive to use dance as a medium to express a strong social message. Like Primus, Abraham uses the work that has come before him to inspire the work he creates, particularly the hip-hop culture of the 1970s and the civil rights struggle of the 1960s.

Abraham states, “I’m creating dance, still today, a lot of the time I’m just moving in relation to what the subject matter is.” This is something that all artists, famous or amateur, can aspire to do.  Despite dance being a very abstract form of expression, it should never be wrikyle dancetten off as meaningless. When one creates art, they must consider what react they want to evoke in their audience, even if the audience in reality doesn’t always understand it at first. For this reason, I took me personally a few views of Kyle Abraham’s and Abraham.In.Motion at the Modlin Center clip to make heads or tails out of it. Before we see a dance performance in person, I personally will try to get as much background information about the authors intended message so I can better appreciate what is going on.

Turandot Reading Response

Giacomo Puccini’s 20th century opera, Turandot, is a masterpiece about sacrifice and love. Turandot is an eccentric tale about a young princess by the name of Turandot.

Princess Turandot does not want to be controlled by a man. Anyone who is a potential suitor of Turandot must answer three riddles correctly or be beheaded. An unknown prince, Calaf, falls head-over-heels in love with Turandot and is willing to bear the risk of death to become her husband. He able to answer the three riddles with little hesitation. Calaf, knowing the Turandot does not want to marry him, tells her that if she can find out his name, then she can murder him. Liu, the servant of the prince, proclaims her love for the prince and kills herself rather than be tortured into revealing his name. In the end, Turandot falls in love with the prince once she sees that he is genuine, romantic, and kind. Turandot proclaims she knows that the prince’s name is “love.”

Turandot 1

At face value, the story of Turandot is quite silly. Granted, most plots of operas have a certain level of being over-the-top. It is quite ridiculous that Turandot could believe that answering riddles would be a good judge of character. The obvious response to my observation is that Turandot didn’t want anyone to answer the riddles properly so she could stay permanently single. I would ask why she couldn’t just turn down all the suitors? How could she have the power to behead men but not turn down suitors? If the goal was not to have anyone figure out the riddle, why not make the suitor solve a hundred riddles? While we are covering topics that confuse me, how is hope and answer to “What is born each night and dies at dawn”?

Turandot 2

I’m not sure if any of the characters are relatable either. I can somewhat relate to self-sacrificial loyalty of Liù. I feel that type of loyalty towards my friends and family, however I’m not sure Calaf is worthy of that loyalty. Even though he is nice, Calaf seems rather two dimensional. Love isn’t supposed to purely physical. As an amateur writer, this has always been a pet peeve of mine. Love isn’t a one time grand gesture; love is a combination of little moments two people share that grow into love. At the beginning of the opera, I applauded Princess Turandot for being strong and independent. However, it seems like poor character development to make a character with her personality traits give in so easily to spur of the moment emotions. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that people of strong character shouldn’t fall in love, I believe quiet the opposite actually. I’m saying that people should fall in love slowly, with people whose everyday quirks are captivating.  I hope Puccini would have written a better ending where Princess Turandot doesn’t change so drastically.

Exposing the Need for Democracy in Hong Kong

Christopher Doyle, or Dù Kěfēng in Mandarin, is an Australian-Hong Kong cinematographer who often works on Chinese language films. Christopher Doyle has won international acclaim for films like Wong Kar-wai’s “In the Mood for Love” and Zhang Yimou’s “Hero,” both of which came out at the beginning of the turn of the century.

Roughly a year ago, Hong Kong erupted in mass youth protest. The goal: to prevent the government in Beijing from controlling local elections. Christopher Doyle is now releasing a film where he chronicles the events.

According to Joyce Lau’s September 2015 New York Times article, “Capturing the Voices of Hong Kong,” “Doyle crept into the protest zone at the break of dawn, when demonstrators were sleeping, and filmed details of daily life: a little girl delivering water, a lone teenager in the makeshift study area, a middle-aged man collecting garbage on a metal cart.” Doyle, at the age of 63, managed to capture the “intense and prolonged waiting” of the movement.

doyle

The footage has been included in Doyle’s film, “Hong Kong Trilogy,” which had its premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival last month. In Hong Kong, it is set to premier on the one-year anniversary of the police’s tear-gas assault on student protesters. Further, it is expected to also be shown in Denmark, South Korea, and India.

The movie is said to have both fiction and nonfiction elements as it uses “the voices of real Hong Kong people” as a “blueprint for this story of three generations in our city.” Said three generations are, “schoolchildren (‘Preschooled’), twentysomething activists (‘Preoccupied’) and the elderly (‘Preposterous’).”

HKG

The film has been largely crowd funded, having raised $125,000 of the $200,000 total budget online. This shows the growing public hankering for films that cover politically sensitive event. What makes Doyle’s work so noteworthy is the fact that it covers topics that the Chinese government tries to push under the table despite needing to be resolved.

Despite how unique one culture can be from another, a need for a democratic system of government knows no cultural bound. However, the Chinese government is attempt to abridge this right of civilians in Hong Kong.

Frank Wedekind’s Spring Awakening Response

Frank Wedekind’s first major play, The Awakening of Spring, explores the sexually repressed society of nineteenth century Western culture and what authority figures we should and should not submit to.

In short, The Awakening of Spring follows a number of youths as they explore their emerging sexuality. Notably, the play follows Wendla, Melchior, and Moritz. The lives of the three are ultimately ruined by the authority figures they placed their trust in. After being sexually assaulted, Wendla ends up dead from a failed abortion operation. Moritz commits suicide after becoming a self-perceived failure for failing out of school. Finally, Melchior is expelled for writing a letter to Mortiz about sexuality. Melchior is almost perused to commit suicide by the ghost of Mortiz, but is ultimately stop by the only uncorrupted authority figure in the play, the Masked Man.

There are two clear messages contained within The Awakening of Spring. The first is that it is okay to explore sexuality and discuss it. All these tragedies could have been prevented if the children were better informed and not afraid to discuss their sexuality. Adolescence should be a time of exploration. However, by labeling certain topics as off limits for discussion and preventing them from being discussed we as a culture suffer.

Sexuality

The second, more subtle message, contained within The Awakening of Spring is the importance of questioning authority. All supposed figures of authority in The Awakening of Spring; the PastorMrs. Bergmann, Mrs. Gabor, Martha’s parents, Ilse’s parents, and the teachersin someway eventually fail the children who trusted them. The only true exception is the Masked Man. It is hard to say exactly what the Masked Man represents. Perhaps, he represents a higher power, in which case the message becomes that the only true authority is that which comes from our own spirituality and our own set of values. Moreover, the Masked Man could represent truth. This would make sense since he reveals what death really is like to Melchior. The message then becomes that we should only value the truth as authority.

Cartman

Regardless, it is important to discuss and contemplate what the value of labeling “taboos” have within our society and who we should follow.

The Artistic Masterpiece That Is Time Square

When one thinks of New York City, the image that pops up in most people’s mind is of a busy Time Square. This image of New York is by no measure uncalled for. According to Forbes, “26 million people visit Times Square each year, which is about 50,0000 people who go through Times Square every day, which consists of 25,0000 employees, residents and of course tourists.”

Screen Shot 2015-09-29 at 1.31.17 PM

Time Square is perhaps the world capital of modern art with people running around covered in body paint, amateur artists selling their works, and costumed panhandlers. It is an inspiring piece of New York that is a leaves a positive finger print on American culture and will only grow in importance as time progresses. However, many would disagree with this assessment. Michael Kimmelman in he September 22, 2015 New York Times article, “Making Times Square’s Pedestrian Plazas Work,” reports, “William J. Bratton, the city’s police commissioner, to say he’d like to rip the plazas up. The mayor, Bill de Blasio, didn’t disagree, calling for a task force to study ways to improve the square.”

Luckily, instead of demolishing the plazas, Bratton has assigned a special unit to monitor Times Square. Nevertheless, one must understand that ripping apart Time Square is certainly not off the table. I for one believe that Time Square is a valuable artistic asset of the city.

These plazas were established by the Michael Bloomberg administration in order to improve pedestrian and driver safety while encouraging tourists to appreciate the artistic expressions of New Yorkers.

Screen Shot 2015-09-29 at 1.31.51 PM

Moreover, the plaza isn’t only a center for art, but also a piece of architectural art within its own right. NYC Department of Design and Construction calls the plaza, “a back drop for pedestrians in the area.” The validity of this claim is proven when one examines the plaza. For instance, each panel of the concrete pavers has unique design with thousands of stainless-steel pucks implanted within them, which will reflect the lights of Broadway.

Screen Shot 2015-09-29 at 1.29.43 PM

However, the story doesn’t end there. Kimmelman clarifies, “Craig Dykers, a founding partner of Snohetta, the firm hired five years ago to design the plazas, showed me plans for improvements yet to come, including widened sidewalks along a repaved Seventh Avenue.”

This means we have yet to see Time Square in its full glory. It could become a place that would encourage even more tourism, which in turn would incite more creative, innovative, and even weird artistic voices to be heard in the plaza.

In the final analysis, it becomes clear that we as New Yorkers must advocate for the preservation and expansion of the Time Square’s Pedestrian Plaza.

V.Gangemi Reading Response 2 (Every Portrait/Sargent Made a Scene)

It is interesting to note how controversial art can be. We take for granted the idea that controversial art is a new thing, when in fact it is not. Part of the beauty of art is how it can entice outrage and stir emotion. The work of John Singer Sargent is a perfect example.

Sarah Churchwell in her January 2015 article for The Guardian, “How John Singer Sargent Made a Scene,” makes clear how his most well known painting, Madame X, “inspired outrage, creating a succes de scandale when it was exhibited at the 1884 Paris Salon. Reviews either objected to Madame Gautreau’s appearance (some complaining at the powder-blue pallor of her skin, others at the depth of her decolletage or the shockingly wanton shoulder strap allowed to fall suggestively loose) or hailed the modernity of Sargent’s technique.”

Perhaps one of the many reasons art can be so controversial is because of a disconnect between the creator and audience. This disconnect is highlighted by Debra Brehmer’s October 2010 article, “Every Portrait Tells a Lie,” where she affirms, “When looking at portraits, think of this: Every portrait exposes a truth that rides on the inherent lies. Our existence is transitional and subjective and this is the condition that portraiture tries to absolve.” In other words, a portrait is inherently based on the painter’s perspective, and this is only more convoluted when one mixes in their personal perspective of the painter’s perspective.

This raises the question as to whether or not art can be appreciated from and objective or universal point of view. I would argue no because beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Perhaps a thousand years or so ago art could be defined as good or bad objectively based on how accurate to real life a painting may or may not have been, but with the invention of the camera and the growth of art movements such as impressionism this is no longer the case. The question we all must contemplate now is whether or not that is a good thing. I believe it is a great thing, and I hope you do too.

« Older posts

© 2024 New York Scenes

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑