Author: janaabumusallam (Page 1 of 2)

Mood Diary: Mixed Emotions

When I was a kid, specifically in third grade, we had an assembly where all the sixth graders who played instruments came and put on a little concert for us. The music teachers each got up and introduced each instrument, and then played it a little to let us listen to what it sounded like. Of course, strings were first, and I immediately fell in love with the first instrument they introduced: violin. The notes, though high-pitched, seemed so soothing and gentle to me. I loved the way the violin carried the melody of the songs they orchestra played. I instantly knew that I had to play this instrument.

When we finally started taking lessons, I went to the music store and chose a violin with my mom. This experience was probably one of the happiest in my life. I loved my little half size violin, and I took care of it as if it was my baby. I had every book and CD imaginable about perfecting your playing, and I was one of the few kids who genuinely practiced while they wrote down “half an hour” in their practice log, subsequently forcing their parents to sign it for them. Most kids’ parents didn’t really care whether they played or not, and–because we really weren’t good at all–they didn’t want to hear the squeaking of their instruments on Sunday night before their Monday lesson because they had forgotten to practice all week. I, however, never had that problem. Every time we learned a new song in lessons, we would have to memorize it and come back the next week able to play. Not to be all showboat-y about it, but I was definitely “that kid” who carried the whole lesson group, because I would practice till my fingers were sore every night. Even when I had no idea what I was doing, I kept trying and trying to play really well, because I loved the sound the instrument produced when it was played correctly. My parents were always super supportive of me, and always applauded when I practiced in front of them.

I played that instrument throughout the third and fourth grade, and I grew to really love it. Unfortunately, my school had a surplus of violin-playing students and not nearly enough cellos. Oddly (and, quite frankly, stupidly) enough, at the start of the fifth grade, they chose the best violins to switch and play the cello instead. I was one of those violins. They didn’t even give us a choice. I knew from the second I laid eyes on the cello that I would despise it, and I did. Oh, how I hated that instrument. I had absolutely no idea how to play. My new lesson teacher was awful. I’m convinced that she actually didn’t know how to play, because she literally taught us absolutely nothing. I couldn’t figure out which strings played which notes to save my life. I started practicing less and less, and my shiny, beautiful violin began collecting dust in my closet.

At one point, I started missing school on the days I had lessons just so I wouldn’t have to play that God forsaken instrument. Midway through fifth grade, however, a little before the winter concert, we got a new orchestra teacher. She had been a conductor for a pretty long time, and she was old and pretty cruel to those who didn’t play well. For fear of my music folder getting flung off my stand by her baton, I decided to get my rear in gear and start playing like I should. I began treating the cello the way I had treated the violin: bought every CD and book imaginable about cello playing and practiced for hours on end–so much so that there’s still a little hole in my floor where I used to put the endpin of the instrument. By the time the winter concert rolled around, I was ready–I had my game face on; nothing could stop me from playing Jingle Bells with the gusto of a forty year old cellist at Carnegie Hall.

I remember this distinctly: standing in line with my fellow peers, getting ready to go onstage, rubbing the rosin on my bow like crazy. I recall having trouble tuning my instrument because my hands were so sweaty. I had to keep wiping them on my pants. I was crazy nervous because I really wanted to impress my new teacher and become a star pupil again. As I began walking up the stairs to go on stage, however, my teacher grabbed my and dragged me back into the hall. I was so confused; I was about to be on stage, why was she holding me back like this?

Then, she said the words that I have not forgotten to this day: “What do you think you’re doing here? You aren’t good enough to play in this concert.”

I was humiliated to say the least. I ran away, entered the auditorium doors from the back and grabbed my parents to tell them we had to go home. The whole car ride back, I cried. I didn’t touch the instrument for months after that, and made every excuse to get out of lessons. I told my teacher that ballet interfered with my practice, even though I had stopped doing ballet years earlier. My love for orchestra and string instruments slowly died out, and I stopped thinking about playing altogether.

At the beginning of sixth grade, the music teachers came one by one to our classes and told us to sign up for orchestra for that year. I had no interest in doing so. Then, my old lesson teacher leaned in towards me and asked me if I would like to try it again. I figured I might as well: after all, I had–stupidly–bought a cello because I thought I would be really good at it, and it was just sitting in the corner of my room doing nothing. She said she would come back with my permission slip for my parents to sign, but she never did. That officially ended my orchestra career. That is, until this year.

When we visited the Performing Arts Center and heard that string quartet play so beautifully, it reminded me of how much I loved playing the violin. So, I have decided to learn to play again. I already bought myself a brand-new, full size one, and I’m more excited about it than I’ve been about anything since my dreams of becoming a violinist were snuffed out by my awful teachers.

music-violin-instrument-high-definition-wallpaper-download-violin-instrument-images-free

Winnie-the-Pooh On Display in Museum

We have all heard of (and probably loved) the adorable animated movies about a bear, Winnie-the-Pooh. I can definitely remember sitting in front of my TV for hours watching him have adventures with Tigger and Piglet, and I’m sure all of you can too. That’s why this bit of news sort of freaked me out.honeysong

In the mid-1920s, A.A. Milne wrote the books when he was inspired by trips to the London Zoo with his son to see Winnipeg, the celebrity bear who inhabited the zoo after being brought there during World War 1. His son loved the animal, so much so that he named his own teddy bear Winnie.

Sadly, Winnipeg died in the 1930s. However, when she passed away, her body was donated to the Royal College of Surgeons’ Odontological Museum, and she has remained in that collection ever since. Her body even survived a bombing in 1941 that destroyed most of the collection.

winnies skulllRecently, her skull has been put on display for the first time at the Hunterian Museum in London. The Hunterian’s director, Sam Alberti, believes that this will be of particular interest for visitors from all walks of life–especially those who grew up with the messages of family and friendship after reading the books and watching the movies. It is in a display about items added to the 18th century collection, and Mr. Alberti hopes that it will serve as an entry point for people who others wouldn’t go into the museum. On top of all that, apparently Winnipeg’s skull offered an interesting case study: she had pretty severe gum disease. This, Mr. Alberti says, was probably because of the honey on the sticky buns she was being fed by the visitor’s of the zoo out of love. This drew an interesting parallel with the real-life bear and the animated movies. It’s interesting to see the inspiration behind an artist’s work. I think it really helps the audience connect with the works even more than they originally did.

This honestly sort of creeped me out a little, even though when asked if the exhibition ran the risk of scaring children, Alberti said that it is a happy message. They certainly didn’t want the message to be “Come to the museum and see Winnie-the-Pooh”, because that certainly isn’t what it is. It’s a skull nonetheless, but it gives the children the message that Winnipeg, the bear who inspired their favorite fluffy, cute, animated character, “has had this afterlife”.

Winnie-The-Pooh-bv29

Modern Dance is the New Charleston

Before reading about and watching the clip of the dancers, I truly thought that (what I thought was) modern dance was actually something entirely different. I really wasn’t so interested in it before, but reading the article History of Black Dance: 20th-Century Black American Dance really made me realize that I had no idea what contemporary or modern dance truly was. 05_TheGettin_PhotobyIanDouglasI just assumed that interpretive danced sort of fell under that category, but now I realize that isn’t the case whatsoever. I knew that Black culture and the Harlem Renaissance had an impact on a lot of different categories of expression (i.e., jazz, dances adopted across the nation, etc), but I had no idea that modern dance was one of them.

The fact that modern dance was introduced during that time period by ‘people of color’, not to mention women, is truly iconic and makes a profound statement about these people. Katherine Dunham and Pearl Primus were unafraid of what people thought, and they went with what they wanted to do even though not many people were receptive to it. pearl primusThe research that they did to choreograph their dances was extensive and thorough, simply because they believed that dance, as a form of expression, should be on par with white dance. Traditional black dance from Haiti and Jamaica and traditional white dance from Europe should have the same level of impact in society. One should not be superior to the other. These women broke the chains that bound them in society to be inferior in both gender and racial equality, and they have a huge line of dancers after them to thank them for doing that.black ballet

When I was younger, I did ballet for about five years. I realized that it really wasn’t for me, and that my limbs simply couldn’t be as rigid and perfectly straight as they needed to be in order for me to be good at ballet. I stopped dancing a long time ago, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t still enjoy watching it. In fact, I feel like I would be better at modern dance than I ever was at ballet simply because of the fluidity of the dance. Contemporary style doesn’t have to mean ‘interpretive dance’, the kind that everyone has made fun of. Contemporary dance can portray a world of emotion in just a few simple movements, and I feel like anybody can use modern dance to be expressive. Watching the video of the dancers really excited me for this show, and I can’t wait to see how they are able to tie meaning in with their dances. 05_TheGettin_PhotobyIanDouglas

Turandot Reading Response

The opera Turandot by famed author Giacomo Puccini is an interesting piece that is, as with any opera, full to bursting with drama from the opening act. The play begins almost at the climax of a plot point by announcing the execution of the Prince of Persia. The crowd proves to be bloodthirsty and enraged, so much so that an old blind man is pushed around and trampled on by the crowd. His slave cries for help and a man comes forward to aid her.

Upon realizing that the old man is his long-last father Timur, the deposed king of Tartary, he is overjoyed and immediately tells him not to speak his name because he fears the new Chinese rulers. Apparently, Liu (the slave girl) has given her life to help stay by Timur’s side, because the prince had once smiled at her. From the very beginning, the opera is highly unrealistic.

 

Of course, the Prince of Persia is too handsome to be killed, so the prince of Tartary begs Turandot not to have him executed. Though she ignores the crowd’s pleas, the second the Prince of Tartary sees Turandot, he falls madly in love with her. He immediately strikes the gong, signaling that he wants to marry her. Of course, everyone tells him not to, even Liu. Why? Because she’s in love with him. This part irritated me. She hadn’t seen him in years, and simply because he smiled at her once when he was a child she’s been in love with him ever since? This screams ridiculously cheesy to me.

While reading this opera, I honestly expected it to get better the further in I got. I’m  not so sure that I enjoyed this reading. The fact that she was so confident that she would kill all her suitors just annoyed me. The prince won her hand fair and square, in my opinion. She tells the whole kingdom that she’s going to kill all of them if nobody tells her the Prince’s name by sunrise, which is the complete opposite of what she said would happen if her suitor answered the three riddles correctly. Liu ends up killing herself for this guy. He’s not the great hero I thought he would be, either. He forces himself on Turandot. Their relationship dynamic just doesn’t make any sense. They both hate and love each other at the same time. It’s as if the writers forced a happy ending for the two.

Hopefully I’ll be able to enjoy the live opera, but reading it was just too much drama for me. It felt like something I could watch on basic cable, not something that has been highly acclaimed as Puccini’s best work.

turandot2

William Yeats’s Enchanted Tower

In Ireland there is a place called Ballylee, and in that place you can find a tower, which is now home to bats, mice, and mold. It also harbors a piece of the legacy of William Butler Yeats. This tower is called Thoor Ballylee, and it inspired much of his work.04YEATS1-master675

Over the years, though, the “Norman tower has encountered natural challenges so daunting that the Irish government had to shut it down as a tourist site”. However, that has not stopped a devoted neighbor and other local residents from working hard to keep the tower alive and open to the public. As a result, you can see this wonderful tower in all its glory during select tourist seasons. It has become an attraction once again, offering the inspiration of the poet’s faint presence to readings, seminars and musical events.

Yeats would never even speak to his neighbors. He would simply remain holed up in his building, writing for hours on end, completely engrossed in the task of perfecting his works.

04YEATS2-articleLargeHe paid a very small sum for the tower. It was rumored to have been built in either the 15th or 16th century, and was in need of considerable repair, as it had become sort of a shed. in 1917, Yeats bought the tower that had long-enchanted him and began working on it with his wife, George Hyde-Lees, and an architect in order to transform the tower into a place of inspiration. The walls and curtains were all strikingly colorful, and the poet often wrote on a table adorned with wildflowers. Yeats used the upstairs quarters–a study, a master bedroom and a guest room–as inspiration for his work, as well as the winding staircase that led to the upstairs.

During his time at Thor Ballylee, Yeats and his wife had two children. He was appointed to the Senate of the newly founded Irish government, and he won the Nobel prize in Literature in 1923. However, it wasn’t all good times at the tower. The civil war in Ireland came to his doorstep in the early 1920s. According to R. F. Foster, the author of a biography of Yeats, the Irish Republican Army arrived one day to announce that the bridge beside the tower was about to be blown up, and to suggest that Yeats’s wife take the children and maid upstairs for their safety. Sure enough, Yeats’s wife was said to have heard two loud explosions, with the I.R.A. officer saying that all was clear afterwards.04YEATS6-articleLarge

In 1928, Yeats published an anthology of poems that he named after his beloved home, “The Tower”. It contains important poems like “Sailing to Byzantium” and “Among School Children.” Soon after, though, he had to abandon his precious tower for reasons of convenience and his failing health, which left it to the abuse of the elements. Thanks to residents in his old community, a part of Yeats remains after more than a century, through stories shared by neighbors he barely knew.

Frank Wedekind’s Spring Awakening

The play Spring Awakening by Frank Wedekind, first published in Germany in 1891, explored many different controversial and radical ideals for the time period, including sexuality, rape, and suicide. Even controversial in today’s society, Wedekind’s characters experience many life-altering events

springawakening at very young ages. This play depicts the loss of their innocence throughout their teenage lives, and how their parents attempt to shelter their children in order to keep them in a state that is as young and childlike as possible.

The themes in this play explore certain issues at hand that people in that time period didn’t generally discuss in their day-to-day lives. The most prominent of these is sexuality. The direct introduction to sexuality and experimentation begins in the second scene of the play and is noted and expanded upon throughout the piece. The sexual aspect of the play immediately makes the work as a whole an extremely radical work. This in turn led to decades of censorship and omission of scenes and lines throughout the play. However, I don’t think that Wedekind used the idea of sexuality to shock his birdsbeesaudience. Rather, I believe that he meant for the play to evoke thought and questioning. One of the most controversial aspects of this topic is Wedekind’s inclusion of homosexuality. This idea was frowned upon in society, and in Germany, you could be jailed for it. Fortunately, the acceptance of homosexuality in society has dramatically increased since that time period, and, though not embraced in totality by all, sexuality is now something that people are quite comfortable discussing regularly.

Another theme that really stuck out to me while I was reading this play was the difference between parents and their children. In Spring Awakening, relationships between parents and children are somewhat unsuccessful. All the parents in the play attempt to bring up their children to live as they did, yet almost all of their efforts seem futile. Moritz commits suicide, Wendla dies, Martha’s parents abuse her consistently, almost to a point whereparentsvschildren she seems to want to murder them, and Ilse’s parents are entirely absent. For parents that want to shelter their kids from the outside world and prevent them from growing up and learning too fast, they don’t do a great job. Many of the children end up having their own ideas about how they will form their families and raise their children-and they seem to be entirely different from their parents’ ideas.

Overall, the play touched on many different aspects of life that seemed too radical to think about in the 19th century. However, it is interesting to note that, while most of these ideals have been accepted in our modern day society, we still have some trouble discussing other ideals, even ones that are less controversial, such as race. It is noteworthy to mention that the ideas that a society finds controversial reflects on the time period as a whole, which I found very interesting while reading this play.

Creative Project 1: La Carmencita (1890)

The first variation is a photo-edit of an Indian dancer in my old classical dance group – edited with a paintbrush effect + placed on top of a dark backdrop. The second and third variations are action shots of my friend and her sister doing classical Indian dances during a recital.

Sargent's Original: La Carmencita

Sargent’s Original: La Carmencita – Spanish dancer

Classical Indian Oddisi Dance - Variation 1

Classical Indian Oddisi Dancer – Variation 1

Classical Indian Kathak Dance - Variation 2

Classical Indian Kathak Dancer – Variation 2

Classical Indian Bharata Dancer: Variation 3

Classical Indian Bharata Dancer – Variation 3

John Singer Sargent: Reading Response 9/10/15

When I was reading yesterday’s articles on John Singer Sargent, I didn’t learn much about him or his life. I mainly learned about his paintings and his style, and that is what I focused on. This made today’s articles very interesting to me because I never would have guessed that Henry James and Sargent were such close friends. Then again, that is probably why James gave Sargent such a glowing review of his work in “Picture and Text”. The article “How John Singer Sargent Made a Scene” by Sarah Churchwell focused a lot on their friendship and how their lives intertwined. What truly surprised me was how the author was able to describe Sargent’s personality simply from his friends’ quotes. Even though Churchwell’s main focus seemed to be comparing the two friends, she deviated a bit from her focus in order to elaborate even further on Sargent’s lifestyle.

Sargent,_John_SInger_(1856-1925)_-_Self-Portrait_1907_bI thought that “Every Portrait Tells a Lie” by Debra Brehmer was very interesting to read. I think

h2_32.154that what she said about portraiture is true: it is indeed a lie. People always try to get the best shot in photography, even if it means messing with how candid a scene is. Many family pictures are staged memories. The viewer of the picture, however, doesn’t see what happens before or after the picture is taken. They see a memory that has been tampered with. I feel that this may have been the case with some of Sargent’s paintings. When Churchwell stated that it was possible that him and Charlotte Louise Burckhardt (Lady With the Rose– pictured right) were having an affair, I felt like her smug face in that painting seemed like it made more sense. Maybe they had a fight right before he decided to paint her face, and ended up painting her looking like she was annoyed or angry. She looks like she seemed very bored with the idea of being the subject of his painting, as if she had modeled for him in the past many times. I feel that it is also possible that she feared suspicion from people around her if she modeled for a painting. These are all essentially crackpot theories, but I feel as though these two articles opened my eyes even more to Sargent’s works as well as his private lifestyle. 

John Singer Sargent: The Great American (?) Artist

Vincent Van Gogh, Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse—though their styles may differ significantly, these world-renowned artists have one thing in common: none of them were American. In fact, we rarely hear of very many well-known artists who originate from the U.S., which the article “Picture and Text” by Henry James points out. John Singer Sargent is seemingly American because of his origins. However, this so-called ‘American’ artist, who was born of American parents, and though is American by ethnicity, cannot be called an American. He is, in fact, a man of European origin. He was born and raised in Europe and his artistic style can be mistaken for distinctly Parisian, so much so that, according to H. Barbara Weinberg, even the British of his time period thought his work was the work of a Frenchman.

Sargent nevertheless truly produced some incredible and thought-provoking pieces of art. Henry James points this out in “Picture and Text”. Many of the women he painted seemed completely different than our image of the ‘usual’ painted female. I feel that many women who are painted in a Victorian time period are all seen as the same thing: delicate, soft-spoken, pleasant, and beautiful. Though many of these qualities are seen in these paintings, there seems to be another common thread throughout Sargent’s works: many of the women seem candid, as if posing for a picture. The actual paintings even look like photos. The contrast in brushwork between the background and the dresses and faces of women he painted is truly iconic. One painting in particular that caught my eye was Lady With the Rose (pictured left).

Unknown

If one focuses on the background, it seems almost rushed and as if paint was simply splattered on the canvas in a haphazard fashion, yet it gives off the texture of a rough and sturdy material. However, it is clear that the background is painted this way because of the beautiful nature of the main focus of the work: the woman in black. The sheer lace detailing at the sleeves and neck of her gown seem almost invisible, but if one looks hard enough, it seems to cast a slight shadow over the skin underneath. The crinkling of the gown seems picturesque, and her slight, wry smile and tired eyes seem to reveal this woman’s identity. Since we know nothing about her, we could speculate about her stern, almost bored look for hours.

Another image that made me question whether these were truly paintings or rather simply photos was Lady Playfair (pictured right).

lady playfair

The background is plain, similar to the previous painting, but the main focus, again, is the woman, which the background is clearly meant to highlight. Certain parts of her metallic-looking, silk-like dress are illuminated very brightly while other parts are dark. This is clearly the artist playing with a strong light source in order to accurately portray the texture and material of her gown. Her bows dangle in a very feminine and delicate fashion, and the dimple in her elbow makes her seem undeniably tangible, as if her story can truly be pictured simply because of the artist’s attention to detail.

His biography by H. Barbara Weinberg does not agree with Henry James. Weinberg states that his lineage is distinctly American, even though he lived all his life in Europe. His artwork, though in my opinion not that of an American artist, is nevertheless extraordinary.

« Older posts

© 2024 New York Scenes

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑