Category: John Singer Sargent/Picture and Text (Page 2 of 2)

Anthony Chen’s Reading Response

John Singer Sargent

In John Singer Sargent’s biography, he had a unique family background, who supported, and helped nourish his  potential for art. Although his parents were American, he himself was born as a European, and traveled abroad to Spain, Holland, and Venice to gain inspiration from works by others. Through time and dedication, he received recognition for his work from England to the United States. What I feel is interesting about his style is that he was influenced by Carolus-Duran to paint immediately rather than make rough sketches first. In the Drawing and Painting classes that I have taken, the teacher has always told us to first do preliminary sketches.

Fumée d’Ambre Gris

The painting, Fumée d’Ambre Gris (The Smoke of Ambergris), drew my attention because it was a cosmopolitan form of description that reached out to the viewer. You have the feeling you are looking  at a piece of Moorish architecture because of the pillars, a woman with asiatic and middle-eastern style attire, and most of all, the embroidery and intricacy on the rugs and pottery makes you feel as though you are in a royal setting. 

According to Henry James in “Picture and Text,” his paintings such as Young Lady in Black have  striking characteristics in which it appears to be simple, yet overflows with perfection. Sargent also had many other diverse influences in his work such as his portrait, Madame X encompassed the style of Edourad Manet and Japanese prints. As James indicates, Sargent takes artistic risk in his paintings because of his curiosity and creativity, which I find brilliant.  After analyzing many of his other paintings I also feel that Sergeant puts a lot of effort into his female portraits and paints them with a sense of surreal intensity.   

 

Madame X

I also felt some injustice when his best known piece received criticism because of his indifference to pose, modeling, and spacial treatment. Although Sargent was a nonconformist in the arts during his time period, his lack of symmetrical balancing allows the viewer to take in the work as a whole. Indeed, diverting from what is deemed “normal” and “socially-accepting” during his time period was a gutsy move, and furthermore shows his values and creativity. What was most striking to me was when Sargent changed from being a portraitist and muralist to a watercolorist in his later years. His watercolor paintings seem to be more chiseled in strokes, compared to his crisp oil paintings. 

John Singer Sargent/Picture and Text Response

“Picture and Text” started off by asking a question that I also had while reading John Singer Sargent’s biography: Why is he considered an American artist? He was born and raised in Europe and his style is clearly linked to Paris and other great European artists and masters. Later in his life he decided to settle down in England, not the United States, despite British commissioners being hesitant about his French style while Americans were excited to sit for his portraits.

But origins aside, the sample of paintings blended into the writing were undoubtedly brilliant. The lighting and sharp contrast between dark and light created a severe, dramatic effect. With Lady Playfair (1884), he managed to cultivate a shiny, metallic texture for her clothing and a wrinkled-paper-type look for the background using the soft oils of paint.

Lady Playfair (1884)

Intriguingly, the women in his portraits have a steely determination in their gaze – a sharp contrast to the soft, naive sweethearts or seductive models portrayed by various other artists. These women have character and position; they have a household to run and family to support; they command your attention and respect. This is especially evident in one of Sargent’s most popular portraits, Lady with the Rose (1882), seen below.

She may be holding a delicate flower but her facial expression and stance shows that she is anything but!

I found the tracing of Sargent’s stylistic influences interesting in H. Barbara Weinberg’s essay “John Singer Sargent (1856-1925)”.  She names Claude Monet, Diego Velazquez, Rembrandt, Sir Anthony van Dyck, his teacher Carolus-Duran, and even Japanese prints to have a profound effect on his style that is visible in his work.

Philip IV (c.1624-27)

The portrait shown above was painted by Diego Velazquez. The influences on Sargent that Weinberg mentioned are clear in the distinct clarity of the face and dark shadowed background and clothing.

The clarity and sharpness of his painting is what drew me most to Sargent. At first glance, I thought his portraits were photographs! This is the very simplicity and “lucid” tenor that rings true with Henry James in his essay “Picture and Text”. As he exclaims, “the process by which the object seen resolves itself into the object pictured is extraordinarily immediate. It is as if painting were pure tact of vision, a simple manner of feeling.” John Singer Sargent manages to turn art, that intangible complex practice of conversion from mind to medium, into something very straightforward and visible to us all.

9/9/15 Reading Response #1

Sargent's Madame X

Sargent’s Madame X

One of Sargent’s portraits that he was so famous for

John Singer Sargent lived a very privileged childhood, his family traveled to Florence, Rome, Nice, and the Alps just to stay away from harsh weather.  Sargent’s parents thought they could give their child a better education then a school could, he received a “Baedeker education” from them. “Sargent learned geography, arithmetic, reading, and and other disciplines” from his father, where his mother, who was an amateur artist, encouraged him to draw and provided many subjects for him to paint. I feel that Sargent gained an advantage over other artists in his early years because he was not burdened by a formal education, and was therefore able to pursue his passion while other blooming artists had to wait until adulthood to work on their skills. In his later teenage years, Sargent was able to study art formally starting in 1873 and shortly after was moved to Paris to “foster his talent.” Sargent’s father made this decision, supporting his son’s artistic pursuits. I do not believe that in today’s society that a father could make the same move, it is simply not a sound financial decision to pursue the arts as a career. If someone were to do this today, they’d almost certainly be ensuring a lower-class lifestyle where they would have to struggle to pay their bills and I don’t believe that a modern parent would see this and encourage it. Defying the odds, Sargent was able to move around to where he could make commissions and was popular due to the “notoriety” of his work, Madame X. Madame X included “an unmodulated treatment of the face and figure inspired by the style of Edouard Manet and Japanese Prints”, which was uncommon at the time and was not appreciated by critics. From the readings, it appears that Sargent often got bored and changed his styles and location to satisfy his artistic desires. Sargent has did most of his most popular work in France, Great Britain, and the United States, being popular for his portraits and later in life, his watercolors. I don’t believe that Sargent would tell us that he has ever worked though, he seemed to love art so much that creating it was more of a passion than an occupation. While I do not share the same passion for the arts, I envy Sargent’s devotion to it and his resilience to the not-so-kind critiques he received at times. if he were able to tell us how he felt about his life and career today, I don’t think that he would say that he resents anything he did or would change a thing.

John Singer Sargent… An American painter? (Reading Response 9/9)

Is John Singer Sargent Italian? French? English? Or is John Singer Sargent American? Whatever the case may be, John Sargent is a one of a kind artist who makes his subjects stand out in his paintings in a noble fashion. His vast cultural experience allow his work to grasp a country’s culture and mindset. Each of his works have very different messages, due to his interesting background, that are heavily dictated by palette of colors he chooses for his subjects.

join-the-social-good-summit-global-conversation-75507bb3631

In John Singer Sargent’s works, Young Lady in Black (also known as the Lady with the Rose) and Lady Playfair, show very similar styles, yet they are very unique. In both works of art, you immediately see that they are portraits of females (probably women of noble class) in very elegant dresses with flowers in hand. In Young Lady in Black, instead of holding a bouquet of colorful flowers, the woman is holding a single white flower that greatly contrasts with her dark dress. This creates a darker atmosphere within the painting and the theme of light versus darkness. It is a seemingly depressing piece of work, but the women’s face seems like the faces of children when they don’t find a magician’s tricks amusing, unimpressed like our president. The dress resembles crow feathers, which further emphasizes the gloomy aura in which the painting radiates.

On the other hand, Lady Playfair uses a darker background and a dress that has a shine imitating gold. The dress seems so realistic, almost as if John Singer Sargent got gold foil and gilded the painting. Maybe the bouquet of flowers that the woman is holding shows off her more “senior” status, and maybe the colors shows her life to be more rounded off and completed. Unlike Young Lady in BlackLady Playfair‘s face is much more content and more willing to get her portrait done, more of proud of her given situation.

John Singer Sargent must’ve met many different types of subjects while creating his refined portraits, just like Baruch and its diverse student body, you never know who you’ll meet.

In John Singer Sargent’s other artworks, they each have their very own character that are sometimes polar opposite in personalities. Take a look at Doctor Pozzi and the person in the white robe. Unlike the person in the white robe, Doctor Pozzi is portrayed to be a man of great power, which is conveyed through the painting’s blood red theme. Personally, he looks like he would hurt someone if he didn’t get his way (quite ironic since the person is a doctor). The person in the white robe is painted to be very serene and forgiving in nature. Maybe as humans we should be more open to seeing life in different perspectives. The white theme of the painting is definitely much more forgiving on the eyes and, as a result, allows the audience to focus on the religious ritual the person is performing on the vibrant flooring the person is standing on. John Singer Sargent emphasizes on certain colors in his paintings to give them very distinguishable personalities.

YinYangDragon_3_256175302

Sounds live in John Singer Sargent’s El Jaleo and The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit. The lighting effect on El Jaleo makes the artwork lively and puts spectators of the painting in the audience.  In addition, the  shadows are just as lively as the people dancing, performing the music, and clapping to the powerful vibe of Spanish music; there is so much energy bouncing off the painting.

On a much calmer note, The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit has a dainty classical piece that compliments the art. The calm demeanor of the girls with the grand room constructs a small ensemble playing the most relaxing and playful classical music known to man. The lighting of the room is very natural, which can only bring back memories of the non-stressful days as a kid. John Singer Sargent can dictate a piece’s melody through different perspectives of lighting.

classical-music-2

John Singer Sargent has most definitely lived a life that many people will probably never experience. His diverse cultural background enabled him to create very powerful and calming pieces of art through the emphasis of his color choice, expressions, and lighting. It reminds me of the different experiences I encountered of when I traveled, each place made me grow in different aspects as a human. He understands the culture of what he is painting and then makes his painting scream the times.

September 9 Reading Response

(Self Portrait)

(Self Portrait)

This is John Singer Sargent – an educated and very cultured American painter who made a reputable name for himself despite criticisms by painting many forms and styles of art – murals, portraits, watercolors, genre scenes – and and displaying it to the public world successfully.

When reading the simple art biography of Sargent, I was very interested in the kinds and styles of art John Singer learned about during his journey on to be a successful and respected artist. In May 1874, Sargent was taught under Carolus-Duran who urged his art students to just paint on the canvas suddenly instead of  outlining or practicing any drawings first. This was to “preserve the freshness of the sketch in completed works”. It’s difficult to imagine someone going straight to the canvas and paint a whole picture without any idea on a piece of paper to assist him or her. If I were one of the students, I would take a bit of paint with my brush, put it on the canvas, be unsatisfied, and would have to start all over. Again and again.

Sargent later on went to gain reputation for his portraits and subject pictures when he started to submit his paintings when many people demanded and commissioned him to paint their portraits.

just take my money

Henry James, the author of “Picture and Text” explains in great detail about some of the portraits of John Singer Sargent painted. He describes how Sargent was able to bring something alive from his paintings of the people who modeled for him. Sargent could paint reality and display it to whoever saw and admired the portraits. The audience could feel something and react well to the paintings. I felt like Sargent had portrayed directly what he saw when he was painting his models. One could say that his portraits were like photographs, but his brushstrokes conveyed much more than that and expressed a lot more.

A good example is Madame X, one of John Singer Sargent’s best-known portrait.

However, the portrait elicited criticism for Sargent’s “indifference to conventions of pose, modeling, and treatment of space”. What he painted was unconventional and different from the usual type of paintings in that time period.  When I started to look and scrutinize some of John Singer’s paintings, I do have to admit that I had a questionable look on my face. The way some of the models had their hands positioned and what they were holding or what they were posed next to did cause me to be a little confused.

puppy-head-tilt-o-s

But like all artists, Sargent had a reason to pose his models as so which created some sort of reaction to the people who saw his work – regardless if it was bad or good.

Later on, when many Americans were eager to sit for Sargent, John Singer once again began to gain popularity for his portraits. He jumped over the obstacle of criticisms.

Similar to some other artists, like Thomas Eakens, John Singer Sargent wanted to do more than paint portraits. He branched out to mural paintings for institutions such as the Boston Public Library, Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts, and the Harvard University library. He branched out even further to do watercolors. Later on, Sargent had a great reputation in painting not only portraits, but murals and watercolors paintings.

water color john singer

Karer See, 1914

His watercolor paintings, in my opinion, do not portray as much as a sense of realism than I received from his portraits, but Sargent creates more of a dream that sticks in the person’s mind after seeing it. He gives us just a little glimpse of the beauty of the scene he was painting.

 

 

“John Singer Sargent” & “Picture and Text” Reading Response

Great artists come and go; however, it is those that still create discussion, debate, and reverence, that are truly considered the greatest of their time. John Singer Sargent is certainly one of those geniuses of his era.

Sargent, who lived from 1856-1925, primarily worked throughout Europe. Having trained in Florence, and working in London, Italy, France, the United States, and more, Sargent has a diverse spectrum of influences, as well as spectators. Primarily creating oil paintings and watercolors, Sargent is most notably known for his mastery in his portrait painting style.

According to “Picture and Text”, an essay of John Singer Sargent’s work, Henry James considers Sargent one of the greatest Impressionist artists of his time (possibly ever). James goes on to say that this great praise came with extreme criticism. Some considered Sargent an odd artist, whose work seemed to be “unfinished”; though I do not see it this way. I realize that when one is in a position of greatness, condemnation and negative assessments will be inevitable. Of all his works, Sargent is most notoriously critiqued for one of his earliest works, Madame X (1884).

Madame X(1884)

Madame X(1884)

This specific piece was a portrait put on display at the Paris Salon, and received heavy, scandalous censure. Seeing this piece for my first time, I instantly realize it was way before its time. When I think of 19th century portraits my mind instantly goes to lavish, gaudy garments. The characteristics of such clothing includes modesty. Though this particular piece may seem a bit revealing for its time, I find it to be simply intriguing. The contrast of the pale skin color to the thick black dress, and the dark brown background, catches my eye right away. That, along with the model’s face looking to the right, brings about a sense of tentativeness and ambivalence. I now see why this particular work received such “hit or miss” assessments.

Furthermore, another specific creation of Sargent which similarly grabbed my attention is Young Lady in Black(1879). Another incredible portrait of a woman, this work happens to be notably more detailed and real. After looking at the portrait for some time I couldn’t help myself from thinking it to be so basic. But when I analyzed the background of the painting I realized what it meant to me. The young woman in the painting seems so elegant, and beautiful. In terms of her appearance she seems so graceful, and captivating. Having said that, when you look at her stature, her dress, and the room she is in, the work as a whole seems so amiss. The lady is dressed in a grim black dress, standing impatiently; she seems extremely fed up, and negative. The room she seems to be posing in looks rundown and repulsive. This entire piece of work turned into such a gloomy, eerie scene. It is then that the lone, single white flower that the lady is holding, creates the message in the setting. In such dark, miserable circumstances in life, there is always a bright light at the end of the tunnel. This portrait may have seemed plain and straightforward to some, however, it spoke wonders to me. When discussing this piece, James said, “The language of painting, the tongue in which, exclusively, Mr. Sargent expresses himself, is a medium into which a considerable part of the public, for the simple an excellent reason that they don’t understand it, will doubtless always be reluctant and unable to follow him.”

Young Lady in Black (1879)

Young Lady in Black (1879)

After primarily being in Europe, Sargent started to do much work in America. It was there that he became very popular for his Watercolor paintings. Tommies Bathing (1918) was created with a voyeuristic viewpoint, which would usually act as a repellent to me in the arts. Instantly though, I related this work to the Biblical account of Adam and Eve.

Tommies Bathing(1918)

Tommies Bathing(1918)

The two person character setting, the freedom of being alone in a field, and the oblivious nakedness, draws direct similarities to Adam and Eve. This painting made me question if Sargent had any religious motivation, or connection. I found this particular work very mysterious to me because it is done without much detail. Even more interesting is the fact that the shadows casted across the bodies are done so accurately. I wonder what the message is there. Tommies Bathing proved to be the coolest artwork of Sargent to me, due to the fact that it seemed so familiar, yet so puzzling.

 

John Singer Sargent seems to be the epitome of what a great artist should be. From the time Sargent was trained by his master, Carolus Duran, he knew what his style was. Sargent worked for his own approval, rather than for others. He truly was a genius in his field, and he did not let others inhibit the way he went about his work. As Henry James wrote, “Those who have appreciated his work most up to the present time articulate no wish for a change, so completely does that work seem to them, in its kind, the exact translation of his thought, the exact “fit” of his artistic temperament.”

Portrait of Carolus Duran(1879)

Portrait of Carolus Duran(1879)

Do We Have A Chance?

I danced once at my cousins wedding, and I didn’t have the slightest idea of how to dance. I was dancing out of joy and at that moment I didn’t mind the fact that I probably looked like a bumbling, stumbling, drunk lunatic. The feeling that I remember stronger than the joy I had while dancing was the laughs and snickers erupting throughout my whole extended family as my dancing was played on the wedding film. I never danced again, I never let my immediate emotions dictate my actions again. I share with you this story only to underscore the courage and determination that John Singer Sargent had to have mustered up to ever paint again after Madame X, the greatest work that he had produced up to that point in his life, was publicly criticized and ostracized. Had John Singer Sargent shuddered in the face of his many critics and stopped painting altogether, he would have never discovered his artistry with watercolors.

How I felt when my cousins were laughing at me

I feel that in todays society we have people who can grow to be as talented and revered as John Singer Sargent, but these people are not being given the chance to explore the art as closely as Sargent did. Sargent was encouraged to explore the arts as a child, by his mother, and he eventually was granted the prestigious opportunity to train with Carolus-Duran. Society, the little cross-section of it that I have seen, does not value the arts as it had done once before. Painting, sculpting, musical instruments, and just the arts in general are foreign to me. My best representation of myself on paper is still a stick figure because in my schooling, drawing was not deemed as a useful skill to have.

I have never mastered an instrument because my parents and counselors informed me that taking the cheap, boring, and generic art history requirement would be an “easy A” and then I would not have to waste my time in the coming years in a band or orchestra class. I am amazed when I see people draw themselves and the drawing looks real and I wish that I knew how to play the piano or the violin or any instrument when I hear the performers in the subway putting up a concert with a single instrument.

John Singer Sargents life career was possible due to the motherly support he received and the time in which he lived, a time in which the arts and humanities were bustling. Too many times today stress is placed only in the areas that yield monetary returns. The problem is a societal issue that has developed over time and cannot go away overnight. I think the key to remember is that Jon Singer Sargent was taught “geography, arithmetic, reading, and other disciplines under his father’s tutelage” as well as the arts and three languages. Today, children are taught how to get the most points on a test. Today, our minds do not develop to the extent that minds did in Sargents time.

Freedom. Passion. Art.

Old-Courts

Arts is a form of expression that requires freedom to develop its true potential. Great art is developed by the environment surrounding the artist. John Singer Sargent did not receive any conventional schooling: his father taught him subjects such as geography and reading. His mother encouraged him to draw. Sargent’s mother’s desire to travel expose him to the world and in May 1874, Sargent became a student of Carolus-Duran, who taught all of his student to paint off the head and make no preliminary drawings. As a result of the teaching, Sargent showed painterly freedom in almost all of his works. In the autumn of 1879, Sargent began traveling from place to place in order to view the works of past painters and gather ideas for his art work. In Paris, one of his most known work, Madame X was denounced for its radical styling.  He then traveled to London and engaged himself in impressionist paintings. When he painted Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose, he became more acceptable to English critics. However the Americans were more acceptable of his art, and it wasn’t until the 1890s did British patron agree to pay commission for his artwork. In the 1900s, Sargent became so enervated at the demands for portraits that eventually he went off to study watercolor. As a watercolorist, Sargent received great critic approval and was able to make money. Therefore he chose to refuse all future portrait demands and became an establish watercolorist. Sargent,_John_SInger_(1856-1925)_-_Self-Portrait_1907_b

Based on the biography from “John Singer Sargent,” by Weinberg H. Barbara, John received most of his inspirations from traveling. He has demonstrated painterly freedom. When he faced opposition to his artwork, he doesn’t change his style to match what the people would like. Instead he travels to find patrons who are willing to support how he paints. In the Generalife appeals to me  because of how it is painted. There are little to no defined lines in this paintings, the faces are unclear, and it gives the impression of how art is defined, or rather undefined. The painting made me feel some sort of sorrow. It seems as though the young lady find the painting appealing, but the old lady and the young man isn’t satisfied with it. In the Generalife

 

In Picture and Text, the writer notes the details in the art work that are based upon his perception. Henry James sees Sargent as a developing artist.

James analyzes the artwork. In his mentioning of The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit, he compared the two girls in the back to the tall porcelain jars. He admires the complete effect of the painting and how it reveals their instincts in playing together.

ED-AL373_boit1_DV_20100420172356

 

James analyzes the artwork. In his mentioning of The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit, he compared the two girls in the back to the tall porcelain jars. He admires the complete effect of the painting and how it reveals their instincts in playing together. In this respect, Sargent “sees deep into his subject, undergoes it, absorbs it, discovers in it new things that were not on the surface, becomes patient with it, and almost reverent, and, in short, enlarges and humanizes the technical problem.”
Citation
Weinberg, H. Barbara. “John Singer Sargent (1856–1925)”. In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/sarg/hd_sarg.htm (October 2004)

James, Henry. “Picture and Text.” In Harper’s Magazine, 1893.

Newer posts »

© 2024 New York Scenes

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑