Moving On

It is interesting to see how prevalent the garment factories were in Chinatown before 9/11 although they were in a decline.  They had reputations for quick turn-around times, computer-operated tracking of inventory, and the ability to assemble workers and products in a timely manner.  Before 9/11, there were about 14,000 garment workers in 250 factories.  Garment factories were a huge supplier of jobs for immigrants especially those who did not speak English.  These ethnic enclaves were places where immigrants could find work, earn money, and not have to bother learning the language.  That is one of the reasons why 9/11 was so detrimental to these workers.  They were not trained in other jobs and they did not speak English, so when 75 factories shut down many people were out of work and struggled to afford basic things.

It is also interesting to read about how these Chinese garment workers were effected by 9/11 and to compare it to the experiences we had during that time.  Jobs were lost, less people came to Chinatown, immigrants did not have networks to find jobs, and they also faced the language barrier.  For different reasons, many other people were sent away from their jobs after 9/11.  For example, my aunt as well as so many others were forced to relocate to different job locations when their offices in the Twin Towers were destroyed.  Similarly, the people who were in Chinatown during that time, those who were in the World Trade Center that day, and all New Yorkers in general together had to cope with the devastating event and still do to this day.

Chin – Moving On Response

In her article, “Moving On”, Professor Chin talks about the effects that the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center had on the garment industry and more specifically, the garment workers. I did not find it surprising that the garment industry had already been in steady decline prior to the incident. With a technology-obsessed society such as ours, I was not taken aback by the information that dot-com industries were uprooting the establishments of the garment industry for a long time coming. Even so, the sharp decline that came with 9/11 did come to me as a surprise. As the media has unremittingly portrayed the incident and its effects mostly in accordance to politics and religion, it did not even occur to me to think of specific effects that the event could have had on any one industry, let alone the garment industry in Chinatown.

Reading about these effects came to me as very eye opening. I thought the two views about the workers’ knowledge of English and its respective cause and effects was interesting to read about. The traditional ethnic enclave model claims that the Chinese did not need to learn English because they had settled at a job, at which “they can achieve mobility” without knowing the language. Opposed to this was the Kwong’s model, which claims that the workers are actually trapped in low-paying jobs without opportunities to learn English (Chin 191). Kwong felt that the traditional enclave model undermined the immigrants’ ability to learn English, which is an important asset in finding jobs outside of their comfort zone (191). I personally think that one model is not innately superior to the other in any way and that both are pragmatic reasons that can even go hand in hand with each other. Kwong’s model makes it seem as though it were not the immigrants’ choice to stay in the enclave without learning English but I’m sure that there were many immigrants who chose to stay in the enclave for those specific advantages, such as not having to learn English. As mentioned in the article, this then proved to be one of the bigger hurdles after 9/11, as it hindered the workers’ progress in finding new jobs elsewhere. Kwong’s model, however, is just as viable, as low-paying jobs do limit workers’ opportunities in many ways, and not being able to afford learning a second language is one of them.

Taking into consideration that both these models are equally adequate explanations for the circumstances that ensued, as well as Victor Nee and Jimy Sanders’ views on the mobility trap having favored entrepreneurs over the workers, I’ve come to the following conclusion. The garment industry engulfed its workers into a systematic cycle, from which it became difficult to escape. The workers chose to stay in the industry out of comfort and ease, but soon became limited in their opportunities to escape due to the low wage; nonetheless, because of the comfort and ease, they did not think it was a necessary or grave concern to do so. Consequently, the use of the term ‘mobility trap’ gets a whole new layer of meaning. This interpretation offers another layer of reasoning as to why it was so hard for the workers to find jobs out of the industry they’d always known. The difficulties resulted not only because the workers had grown so accustomed to the industry, but also because the industry had consumed them into its seemingly inescapable hold; once the workers were forced out of it, this loss of momentum, for lack of a better phrase, caused unforeseen predicaments.

– Nadera Rahman

Moving On

“Moving On” focuses on the aftereffects of 9.11 on the garment workers in NYC.
One thing I found baffling was that although the factory workers already made a meager pay, they were paid even less after they had lost their jobs. This meant that the lifestyles that were already less than satisfying sharply decreased. I can’t imagine being put into such a situation, but I can however relate because when my parents got laid off from work when they first came here, our way of life declined significantly.

 
I also found it interesting that although the sharpest decline of factory work occurred after 9.11, factory work had been declining way before 9.11. Labor had been outsourced to other places and sweatshops contributed to a steady decline. However, I was just as shocked to realize that although the industry had been declining, “apparel is one of the two largest manufacturing industries in the city”. I was not surprised however, to see that even though Chinatown is such a small area, it is so densely populated and after 9.11 business had gone down drastically because most Chinese worked in that specific area in the factories established there.

Response to “Moving On”

1. As someone who was not in NYC when 9/11 disaster happened, a lot of this information is new things to think about for me. I only knew that the disaster damaged the health of some people and businesses of others due to the 9/11 help ads in the subway. This article made me think about the way these businesses work. I was wondering how come they are losing so much money. It is obvious that the businesses won’t make a profit shortly after the disaster since people won’t be going there to buy things due to lack of train service and other problems, but wouldn’t the stores just close for that time? The only losses I could think of would be losing food if it’s a food business and having to pay rent, but I would think that people have some kind of savings to not go completely bankrupt. I would imagine no one ordered more food to sell shortly after the disaster, so they wouldn’t be losing money there. I am not familiar enough with businesses to realize what exactly was such a source of devastating losses if the business remained closed for maybe a month or so after the disaster. The real issue I see here is the workers who were not able to get to their jobs at factories after the disaster and therefore were not able to get money.

2. I was surprised to hear that lay-offs, though short, are really common in the garment industry and that most women have been laid off in the past and collected unemployment benefits. Unless the garments made are very specific, it is surprising to me that this happens.

3. How come it was more difficult for women to get relief funds? Also, how is it possible that the city did not notice that some areas were hit by the disaster, such as the area south of Canal street? The people who live in NYC must have seen that that area is obviously affected by the disaster and yet the government failed to act on it. I am glad at least that women and children were able to retain their health benefits.

Moving On

What I found interesting about this article was that even before 9/11 hit, the garment factories, especially in Manhattan, were suffering. This seems peculiar since the garment industry is one of the two largest manufacturing industries in the city. However, because of the expensive rent, competition for space and many assumptions regarding the legality of these “sweatshops”, the garment industry had been going downhill in Manhattan a long time before 9/11. Regarding, the legality of the sweatshops, many people still assume that all sweatshops are undocumented immigrants which gives the factories a bad name. In fact, many are unionized factories that employ thousands of legalized women and pay minimum wage. I have to admit that I did think that most of the factories were these horrible sweatshops that hoarded illegal immigrants and paid hardly anything. I would be really interested in seeing one of these unionized factories.

After 9/11 hit, Chinatown was drastically affected. I knew that most businesses were affected by 9/11, however I really never considered how much not only the factories but Chinatown as a whole was affected. Because of the closing of many of these factories, so many Chinese lost their jobs. Not only that, I never expected how much of a ripple effect there was. Not only were the factory workers hit, but it went so far as even people who came to Chinatown from around the city to buy particular items were discouraged because the shops no longer could carry the items they needed.

Emma Park-Hazel

Response to “Moving On”

As if the decline of the garment industry in New York City wasn’t already rapid enough pre-9/11, the attack happened and the garment factories suffered severely. Being located in Manhattan, in Chinatown, literally no more than a mile away from the World Trade Center was always an advantage, and the factories thrived. Those who ordered garments from NYC factories could check on their orders easily because the trip to Chinatown was short and quick, especially when compared to trips to factories in Asia. However, the factories’ location turned out to be their greatest disadvantage come 9/11. Roads were closed south of Canal Street for over a week, trains didn’t run to Canal Street for over a month, increased traffic due to increased security persisted for months, or even years. Garment factory workers couldn’t get to work and phone service in sections of Chinatown was only restored by the end of 2001. In the meantime, outsourcing occurred at rapid rates, and competition for real estate from Internet-based companies drove rent through the roof. Some businesses simply left Manhattan, while others had no choice but close.

Such happenings left garment factory workers jobless, and in some cases, eventually, homeless. Employers willing to hire these former factory workers were nowhere to be found. With little or no knowledge of English, former Chinese factory workers did not meet the requirements for most other jobs. Many of these Chinese women didn’t know anyone who worked in other industries and, hence, couldn’t ask an acquaintance to help with the finding of a new job. Those who had many a time complained about their garment factory jobs came to really regret having done so. All these newly unemployed Chinese immigrants really wanted their jobs back, but few had their wish granted simply because these jobs were unavailable. Garment factories became more competitive as a result of 9/11 and workers are expected to work longer hours. Flexible hours in Chinese factories became a thing of the past. As one female worker said, “I do what the boss wants….Others who can’t keep up with what the boss wants are told to leave.”

 

It was very saddening to read about how hard it was for former Chinese garment factory workers to find new jobs post-9/11. Would it have been easier for these women to find new jobs today?

How differently would Chinatown have been affected by the World Trade Center attack if the disaster had occurred more recently, in 2011 or 2012?

Response to Chin “Moving On”

The devastating effects of September 11 on women were astounding. The women went from earning $300 a week, to a government given $150 a week after their places of work were shut down. I’d also like to know why it was harder for women to find access relief funds than men. The chain reaction that followed with the garment workers and their homes is unfortunate, especially since they resulted in health concerns due to stress and anxiety.

Another point that I found interesting was that teenage and college aged children had to help their parents pay the bills and mortgages. However, the line that says, “In another, a working age child rented a floor of his house to his parents for only $200 a month” kind of made me think, “huh?” because if my parents were put through a huge loss as a result of such a disaster, I would let them take my master bedroom for free. But maybe that’s just a filipino thing because my mom and my siblings lived with my grandparents for eight years free of charge so that we could save up for five children’s college tuition.

Moving On Response

This article was interesting in that it detailed the decline of the garment industry to even before the events of September 11. The fall of the World Trade Centers only accelerated the process. The outsourcing of labor, spreading of new firms and the image of illegal sweatshops and immigrants contributed to the industry’s early decline. This raises the question: if September 11 did not happen, how long would the garment industry have continued to decline and to what extent?

In addition to this, it was nice to see the effects of the attack from a different perspective. The media portrayed the effect of September 11 on a national scale, while neighborhoods like Chinatown and the garment industry were affected in ways I did not expect. For example, I did not know the disaster zone was divided to only include the south of Canal Street This article was also intriguing because my mother mirrored the trends of some Chinese workers in the industry, and it was interesting to understand the story behind those trends. Like others, she worked in a garment shop when she first immigrated to the United States and took classes to learn English. Later she made the transition to home health care after moving to Staten Island.

-Wendy Li

Moving On

The use of the words ‘mobility trap’ to describe Chinatown was interesting. From that perspective, I agree with Peter Kwong. How many immigrants have actually succeeded in getting to the top, from being a garment worker? The ones who are actually moving forward economically would be the factory owners, or anyone of that sort. I agree with Victor Nee and Jimy Sanders that it is the entrepreneurs that are moving up on the social ladder, not the workers. The garment workers probably didn’t view themselves as being trapped because it was comfortable where they were – that is, before September 11. Before September 11th, they could come into work whenever they wanted. There weren’t set schedules and they got paid piece by piece. This was probably the only work they’ve known and wouldn’t think of anything else. If they had been shown what it would be like to work at a job with the knowledge of English, their views on being “trapped” might have been different. This is probably an exaggeration, but it reminded me of the George Orwell’s book, 1984.

I found it interesting how there was a clear impact of the garment workers losing their jobs on the businesses of Chinatown. It shows that everything really is connected; because income wasn’t being made, money wasn’t being spent. There is no more flow of money, and as a result, the businesses of Chinatown would have to eventually shut down because they weren’t getting any revenue from their customers.

There is a huge emphasis on women in the context of the family. Although this is about garment workers, who are usually women, what about the men? Where do they work while the women at in the garment factories? Were they affected the same way, if they worked in Chinatown?

Surprise Statistics

“Moving On” discusses the effect that September 11th had on the garment industry in Chinatown. One question that I had after reading was simply how have things changed since 2005? A second thought that I had was my surprise at the statistics on the garment industry. “Despite extensive job losses over the last two decades, apparel is one of the two largest manufacturing industries in the city, with annual revenues of $11 billion and 56,600 employees before 9/11” (185). I was surprised to learn that the garment industry is New York City’s “fourth largest export sector,” simply because there seem to me to be other industries that are more prominent in the city (185).

“Moving On”- Chin Response

This article addressed the economic impact of September 11th on Chinatown, specifically how the garment industry played a part in the economic decline following the tragedy. I found it interesting just how integral the Chinese garment industry is to Chinatown both as a source of income and a source of the labor force. Because much of the area was closed down, or was under restriction for weeks or even months after the incident workers were unable to go to work, owners were unable to re-open their shops, and because orders could not be taken or delivered those few months out of business had a huge impact on the area. Not only did the loss in revenue from tourism cause Chinatown to suffer economically, but also the ensuing and lasting unemployment from the temporary failure of the Chinese garment industry put a strain on the recovery and well being of the people living in the area. I was surprised as to the numerical values of the amount of jobs and factories within Chinatown. Never had I pictured that such a small area could be so intrinsically important to so many people.

Moving On: Chinese Garment Workers after 9/11

Chinatown’s proximity to the World Trade Center fueled several of the community’s largest industries.  Ironically, this proximity financially crippled the neighborhood in the weeks, months, and years following 9/11.  First there were the immediate problems of street blockages and telephone power outages.  The area around the World Trade Center was essentially quarantined from the rest of the city.  Chinatown was also blocked off both metaphorically and in many ways physically from the city.  This resulted in the immediate closer of several businesses (particularly factories and restaurants) that relied on income from those who lived and worked in the financial district.

Within a few months thousands of workers lost their jobs.  Real Estate owners who had been waiting for leases to expire suddenly became desperate to renew these leases with the garment factories.  Most of the factories could no longer afford the fee.    In the years to come, ex-garment workers were forced to look outside of their neighborhood for work.  Unfortunately, without the necessary language skills in English (even ESL classes did not always help) they were mostly unsuccessful.  Most had never even completed high school, and had neither the resources nor the skills to easily transition into another industry.

On our tour of Chinatown we saw the direct results of this process.  Decades old store fronts were empty and many now had new businesses where family owned stores had once been.

-Victor Rerick

Moving On

– The intrinsic link between the garment workers’ presence in Chinatown and its economy starkly became evident with the closing down of garment shops after September 11.  I found this point interesting, as garment workers often did their grocery shopping and other errands during their breaks, and thus were frequent customers at stores by the factories where they worked.

– Further, the direct impact that September 11 had on individual families’ economic situations further draws attention to the importance of the garment industry in the Chinese immigrants’ lives.  Some older children in families that felt the economic pinch after September 11 (due to the fact that garment shops were closed down) had to take up jobs to help pay the bills and make ends meet.

– I found the description of Chinatown as a mobility trap to be an interesting way to view this ethnic enclave.  Garment workers in Chinatown are exploited by their employers, who have the upper hand over their undocumented employees.  The fear of being easily replaced forces these workers to be more compliant with the demands of shop owners.  Further, the coethnic nature of the garment shops themselves also transforms this urban enclave into a mobility trap for these immigrant workers.  The ethnic enclave model suggests that Chinese workers do not have to learn English to attain mobility; however, this model was proved wrong after September 11.  Despite taking ESL classes, workers were unable to become fluent in English, thus limiting their resources to work anywhere else.  This inability to become fluent stems from the fact that these workers were not required to use it in their everyday lives, as going to work meant associating with coethnics and speaking in their native tongue.

– In what ways can Chinatown be viewed as an avenue for social mobility, rather than solely a trap that limits immigrant workers?

Chin Moving On: Anissa Daimally

-After 9/11, subway stations and major roads in Chinatown were closed or access was limited. Phone service was also shut off. These factors prevented orders from being placed, completed, and/or picked up in the garment shops in Chinatown. This led to major job losses in the garment industry. It also created a domino effect where the stores in Chinatown also suffered because the garment workers were their major customers. Once these garment workers stopped coming to Chinatown, the stores earned less. Did Hurricane Sandy have the same effect?

– I found it interesting that the Chinese garment workers missed their jobs. They “longed for the job that they complained about so bitterly.” This is perhaps related to the fact that they were in a coethnic workplace where the co-workers shared a common background and language. They also missed the job because it was hard for them to get a job outside of the garment industry. They lacked English skills and networks to other jobs. I believe that this may have been a good thing because these Chinese garment workers needed to realize that they cannot rely on the ethnic enclave to gain a job.

Moving On

-I found it very ironic how after 9/11, the very jobs the Chinese garment workers complained about were the ones they would come to miss. It really seems as though having to work in some of the most unfavorable conditions made the Chinese under appreciate the fact that everyone at the garment factory shared a common language and background. These were the very jobs by which they were easily able to get by the simple fact that they were Chinese.

-Following 9/11, the Chinese population had to wait in lines for as long as an entire day to see if they qualified for the aid being offered. Did history repeat itself following Hurricane Sandy when the Chinese residents were inquiring whether or not they qualified for disaster relief? Did this wait affect if or when businesses could reopen following the structural damage suffered and/or the prolonged period of time without electricity? If there was a lack of assistance for aid, did the Chinese simply turn to another area to get help? For the groups that did aid in relief help, who were they? What type of information did they provide for the community? Did they offer non-perishable items considering that most people lost electricity and thereby were probably in need of the basic necessities?

-Since most Chinese women worked in the garment factories to qualify for health insurance by meeting a certain quota every year, how did insurance factor in when they were unable to work and instead filed for unemployment benefits?  Did unemployment benefits only account for a percentage of the Chinese workers last paycheck and exclude health insurance? If so, what did the Chinese do in order to qualify for health insurance? Was there another program implemented that specifically catered to providing Health Insurance and if so, were there any specific qualifications?