Author: Maxwell Sternberg (Page 1 of 2)

Review of 39 Steps

Entering the Union Square Theatre, on 100 East 17th Street, I was extremely keen on what I was about to experience. As I made my way into the relatively small, and quaint theatre I had no prior knowledge of what was ahead of me. Handing my ticket over to be scanned, I realized I had just made a trade—the usher had handed me a red clown nose. Consequently, this only added to my confusion. When I sat in my seat, I could hear a song playing over the speakers. Quickly pulling out my phone, I “shazamed” the song, and discovered it was “Did You Ever See A Dream Walking?” by Bing Crosby. So at least I had myself a time period: the 1930’s.

The 39 Steps is a melodramic novel written by John Buchan in 1915. Twenty years later, in 1935, the famed Alfred Hitchcock transformed the novel into an adventurous film. It was not until much later, in 1995, that the former novel and film made its way to the theatre. Shortly after, an adaptation was created by Patrick Barlow in 2005. After being performed much throughout Europe, primarily in England, the play made its way across the Atlantic to the Untied States in 2008; however, it would be named Alfred Hitchcock’s The 39 Steps. The play put on display at Union Square Theatre simply goes by 39 Steps.

After sitting through the 100-minute play (excluding a 20-minute intermission), I realized what an adventure I had just experienced. The play itself is a comical, yet thrilling production that takes place in 1935 Great Britain. The protagonist, Richard Hannay, is a middle-aged man who begins the play introducing himself to the audience. From there, Hannay spends the play trying to decipher the “39 Steps,” and in doing so, also tries to foil a spy ring that has already infiltrated his home country. Throughout the many adventures Hannay endures, the audience is introduced to an endless number of characters, who play minor to crucial roles in the plot. Additionally, embedded within the plot are many references and allusions towards previous works of Hitchcock’s. This certainly keeps the audience deeply intrigued, and hysterically laughing at each instance. By the time one gets to the intermission, one will notice the audience members discussing the various Hitchcock references they ultimately caught onto. The several allusions are at times obscure, and at other times extremely apparent. Though many may argue that the 39 Steps is a theatrical production paying homage to Alfred Hitchcock, and all his accomplishments, in fact, 39 Steps is also a creative and inventive play, that produces humor and sensation—this is accomplished using only four cast members.

Yes, that is correct. Four cast members make up the entire set of performers. Director Maria Aitken, does this very astutely, and at times even utilizes it to her advantage. The finite set of players demands quick-changes, various accents, and a fast paced movement, sometimes all within a single scene. Aitken is able to execute this without ever confusing the audience. Though several scenes may get very hectic, the audience reacts in awe as everything has a sense of comical improvisation.

The one cast member who has a consistent and permanent role throughout is Robert Petkoff, who plays the role of Richard Hannay. Petkoff, who has acted in productions of Hamlet, Fiddler on the Roof, Romeo and Juliet, and many more, did the most gratifying job one could think of. Hannay endures adventure after adventure; he is all tied up in the most ridiculous and amusing circumstances, Petkoff strikes the perfect balance between a man of macho enthusiasm, and a leisure citizen– who is unfortunately caught in a pickle being chased by British and Scottish police, while trying to save the country from imminent danger.

The several female characters who play the foils, or at times allies and catalysts to Hannay, are played by Barrie Kreinik. Kreinik, who also has experience performing in Romeo and Juliet and Fiddler on the Roof, is a much less experienced player—and this is evidently present. Between her inaccurate and indecipherable accents, and her overemotionally overwhelming scenes, Kreinik consistently confuses and frustrates the audience. The scenes where she plays a major role seem to lack the laughter and amusement the audience is incessantly craving.

To make up for this shortfall, Billy Carter and Cameron Pow are cast as Clown #1 and Clown #2, respectively; and to say they are anything but incredible would be inaccurate. These two make 39 Steps what it is meant to be: a comedic adventure that keeps the audience laughing and in complete wonderment throughout. Carter and Pow transition through too many characters to count, and for each, their accent, emotion, movement, and timing are as near perfect as one can get. It is safe to say that each time these two hit the stage, the crowd is immersed in hysterical laughter, and at a certain point are expecting and predicting their greatness.

A big reason these two were so successful is due to Christine Goldman, the Prop Master, and Peter McKintosh, the Scenic and Costume Designer. Both did an incredible job at putting in place the tools needed to successfully cast the many animate and inanimate characters/objects the cast members play throughout.

Additionally, Mic Pool, sound designer, and Kevin Adams, Lighting Designer—who won Tony and Drama Desk Awards for his lighting of 39 Steps—create an environment that parallels the ever-changing scenery and situations throughout. Simultaneously, both these designers never distract the audience from the actual plot, playing the stage in an unobtrusive, yet faultless manner.

All in all, 39 Steps will take you through a comical thrill that has you at the edge of your seat, either waiting for who Carter or Pow will metamorphose into next, or the next upcoming allusion to one of Hitchcock’s previous works; just to name a few, the ones I noticed myself were The Birds, Vertigo, and Psycho. As other audience members proudly revealed, there are a multitude of others to be discovered.

Walking out onto 17th Street, I felt a lot more satisfied and less bemused than when I walked in. Well, except for those red clown noses. Maybe, it was just another reference to the works of Hitchcock. Or maybe it was a way to symbolize the humorous, entertaining, and dramatic ride one was just subject to. Whichever you choose, 39 Steps will certainly not disappoint.

Gustav Klimt- Portrait Essay

In 1862, Gustav Klimt, one of the most prominent Austrian symbolist painters, was born. Klimt primarily worked throughout Austria, but more specifically found great inspiration in Vienna. Klimt is especially known for his figurative works and the portraiture of women. Fortunately, I was able to observe firsthand one of Klimt’s works, Adele Blach Bauer II (1912), when visiting the Museum of Modern Art. In this painting, one can see the portrait of a real life woman standing as if a model female. While some may claim that Klimt’s depiction of women as restrained, traditional figures suggests that he accepted the limited role females held in society; However, his use of modesty and conformity in Adele Blach Bauer II expresses that he is actually critiquing society’s expectations of women. In addition, his lively use of luxury and beauty in Adele Blach Bauer I (1907) reveals the potential that Klimt believed women could reach, if not trapped by the expectations of the masses.

 

Standing at 6’ 3” by 3’ 11”, Adele Blach Bauer II is a magnificent oil portrait on a canvas. The portrait was commissioned by Ferdinand Bloch, a wealthy industrial tycoon who was almost twice Adele’s age at marriage. The work was staged in her own house in Vienna, Austria. After first viewing this piece up close, there are a few features which strike me immediately. The way the model is spaced and placed so submerged within the work itself gives off a sense of conformity. It seems as if Adele’s body is actually settled into the background of the piece. The background colors– bright pink, red, blue, and green–evoke a sense of liveliness and energy. The style of background represents the society that women lived in during the early twentieth century. Contrasting with the vitality of the background are the colors of Adele’s dress. The shadowy tan and blue colors of her dress represent a lack of energy and dynamism. It seems as though Klimt was conveying a typical introverted woman who is limited within the boundaries of her society. Furthermore, the posture and stillness of the woman creates a mood of tranquility and serenity. These features arguably represent the submission of all females to the patriarchal society, which dominated cultures across the globe.

 

Subsequently, when analyzing the details of the woman herself, I began to notice the obscure messages and attributes of Adele. The big, round black hat that covers Adele’s hair suggests opulence and wealth. I then noticed the complexity of different textures and colors on Adele’s dress, which was another hint at the state of affluence Adele lived in. During the post-industrial revolution in Europe, there was an economic boom, and the rich only got richer. Simultaneously, women’s positions on the social hierarchy descended more and more. Women were presumed to be inferior to their husbands, and of not much importance. Klimt’s elaboration on grandeur alludes to the elite class and their traditional ideals.

 

Despite all this, the confidence of Adele’s head posture, and the high, prominent platform that Klimt places her on indicates that this woman did have some progressive, dynamic qualities. The woman now takes on a character of superiority, intellectuality, and respectability. However, moving closer, I then examine the facial expression of the woman at hand. I now see a face of emotionless defeat. The woman seems unamused and tiresome. This must have been a direct reference to her role in daily life, during this predominantly male era. Such an expression expresses a sense of frustration, yet she seems to surrender to her subservient rulers. It is as if Adele is fed up with the viewer looking at her the way she is portrayed.

 

Ultimately, I then contrasted the work I saw directly with another work by Klimt. The predecessor to the aforementioned portrait is Adele Blach Bauer I. After briefly exploring this specific piece, I arrived at the conclusion that there are identical messages and themes; yet both pieces are conveyed in polar ways. While Adele Blach Bauer II was a portrait illustrating the common perception of women, Adele Blach Bauer I does the exact opposite. The first portrait of Adele was created in 1907 and shows a different identity of the model. Similarly, like the other portrait, Adele is modeling for Klimt in a typical portrayal. In this frame, Adele seems to be jumping out of the background with a sense of livelihood and energy. The dominance of gold coloring represents a greatness and richness of her character. The use of gold also suggests a newfound sense of power. The gold is ultimately a reference to royalty and positions of authority. Moreover, Klimt uses many different shapes when creating this entire work. With so much complexion and variation, Klimt is offering a view of a woman who has a diverse and multifaceted personality. It can be inferred that with this piece, Klimt presents the authenticity of women, rather than society’s model character. After contrasting these two pieces I see that the underlying theme is now stressed much more clearly—Klimt genuinely believed women were greater than what society considered them to be.

 

Klimt was not just a revolutionary when it came to the symbolism of art, but rather he was also a pioneer for the women’s rights movement. Klimt had the ability to approach issues from many different angles leaving the viewer with their own opinion and perception. By portraying differing works, one being the commonly accepted and one being the subversion of convention, Klimt was able to give women a voice in such a difficult setting. One could say that Klimt could have potentially set the stage for the already momentous feminist movement and the 19th amendment- granting women’s suffrage- which was ratified only 7 years after the completion of Adele Bach Bauer II. Klimt certainly exemplified the influence a great artist can have on his or her era, and the consequences which can follow. Klimt’s use of blatant criticism through contrasting perspectives, not only makes his work singular and unique, but also makes it tremendously relevant and consequential.

Adele Blach Bauer II- MoMA

Adele Blach Bauer II- MoMA

Mood Diary Through a World of Emojis

*Click on image to enlarge view*

Sargent Exhibit- Metropolitan Museum

Sargent Exhibit- Metropolitan Museum

Spring Awakening- Brooks Atkinson Theatre

Spring Awakening- Brooks Atkinson Theatre

New York Times: Art Section Blogs and Comments

New York Times: Art Section Blogs and Comments

Turnadot- Lincoln Center-- Metropolitan Opera House

Turnadot- Lincoln Center– Metropolitan Opera House

Abraham.In.Motion- Joyce Theatre

Abraham.In.Motion- Joyce Theatre

Alexander String Quartet- Engelman Recital Hall--Baruch Performing Arts Center

Alexander String Quartet- Engelman Recital Hall–Baruch Performing Arts Center

Modern Dance From a New Perspective

Being somewhat foreign to the art-form of dance, I was in complete awe after reading the Life+Times interview with Kyle Abraham, and after watching the excerpt of “The Getting” from the dance Watershed and When the Wolves Came In. Having seen quite a few recital performances of other art-forms, I always assumed that dance would be no different. However, I found myself completely dumbfounded and wrong.

Kyle Abrahams, who choreographed the performance we are attending this Thursday night, is not only an exceptional artist, but also a purposeful one. Dance used to remind me of very boring and strict, purposeless movements—basically representing nothing. Nevertheless, Abrahams has taught me to see dance from a new angle. The purpose and passion in which he creates these dances is truly astounding. Abraham feeds off “history and a contemporary aesthetic” in a way to create a performance with endless meanings.

Unknown

Seeing dance as a meaningful and worthwhile work has changed my representation and opinion on it completely. I now see that dance is much more than just a few steps and flexible movements; but rather it can be a story, a lesson, a commentary, or whatever it pleases to be.

Ultimately, though dance may have an underlying theme, I now see how an audience can interpret a dance performance for themselves. The dance itself is just presenting the information or subjects in a different form; the viewer has the supreme power to feel and interpret all that is going on in front of his or her eyes. The first thing that comes to my mind when realizing all this is how the media lacks this characteristic; and in doing so, does the complete opposite. I find that today we live in a world where every news network, magazine, website, or any publication, has its own bias and twist on things. The information may be presented, but ultimately there is some distortion or partiality. Dance defies this new trend, and creates a form of complete clarity and expression.

imagesimages-1

The excerpt of “The Getting” confirms my new appreciation for dance, and also shines a new light on the physicality and technique involved. In this specific case, I found the dancers to be completely light on their feet, and free flowing as if there was no set way of movement. Whether or not this was the actual message Kyle Abrahams was trying to portray, I found that the style and motion of the dancers symbolized freedom. Though I am almost certain that each move was strategically planned and choreographed, the entire excerpt seems as if it is totally boundless and a type of improvisation. The independence which I interpreted translated into a sense of liberty. It seems as if a dance like this is extremely prevalent today, as there is much debate and controversy across the globe over societal and individual liberties. In my opinion, Abrahams has an optimistic, or at least positive, outlook on greater freedoms, and all the rights that so many people fight for. I am excited to see what else is in store this Thursday night, and what other themes or lessons I can then walk away with.

Unknown-2Unknown-1

 

Turnadot Reading Response

Loyalty has many different meanings and associations for every single person. The first thing that comes to mind when I think of loyalty is a soldier. A soldier is one who believes in a cause he or she is fighting for, and is willing to risk their life for it. For some, loyalty may just seem like one who does not lie, cheat, or betray. Nevertheless, no matter how one defines loyalty, one must pledge complete allegiance to that person or that thing they declare loyalty towards.

Unknown

After reading the Libretto of Turnadot, the character that struck a chord in me instantly was Liu. Liu was an inferior slave to Calaf, and despite their extreme class dissonance, Liu fell madly in love with him. Liu is willing to go to extreme lengths over her love for Calaf, and this is most notably shown when she gives up her life and does not reveal his name. Immediately this scene provided me with two new found respects. For one, I found a new degree of loyalty, for which Liu had to her heart. And secondly, I realized that it is only possible in such an artistic form like opera, for such dramatic scenes to take place.

The role of Liu is the new standard of real loyalty that I now hold to. Though Liu went to extreme measures, I now see that she had such dedication, commitment, and love towards something (her heart), or even someone(Calaf). I could not stop myself from thinking about the soldiers that risk their lives everyday for the safety of the country which we live in.

Unknown-1 Liu’s loyalty is an even greater support for the “soldier” definition which I first associated loyalty with. After delving deeper into this matter, I realized how committed these people must feel towards this nation. I realized that I truly take for granted the life I live- especially in such an amazing country- and I start to think if there is anything which I hold so much loyalty towards; especially to a degree that is portrayed in this play. Liu, and her indirect association towards the soldiers that protect our country, has inspired me to bring about some type of awareness towards such commitment. Additionally, I learned that it is extremely crucial to take one’s loyal values into important considerations. At first glance, Lui must seem like some insignificant, inferior slave in a complex story; however, after she expresses such courageous and devoted qualities, my perception of her changed dramatically. One should always develop and maintain such reputable characteristics that both Liu and all soldiers have. It is needless to say that one does not have to go to the extremes that Liu went to—but one must still take the positive practical traits that Liu exemplified, and try to apply that to his or her own life.

Unknown-3

 

Furthermore, to me, opera always resonated a long play of people singing in extremely loud voices, and with no real purpose. However, after reading through Turnadot, and watching the aria of “Nessun Dorma”, I realized that there is a “method to the madness” of this unique art form. Opera creates an environment containing such dramatic and expressive narratives. The music and the content in the play are usually types that could not survive, or fit, in other art forms; but opera seems as if it was made for it. Though I still have much more to explore in this art form which is so new to me, I have found a new lesson to be learned: when confronted with something that may seem unusual and convoluted, I have realized that one should always approach it with complete openness. Approaching Liu too, with complete openness, may have led me to learn more about the favorable and worthwhile character she truly proves to be.

Forgery: Illegal or Artistic?

According to a report compiled by Arts Economics, the art market in 2012 reached 66 billion dollars internationally. This market, though extremely volatile and unpredictable, has endless potential, and has been on it ways up ever since the end of the recession a few years ago. Galleries, such as Christie’s, Sotheby’s, and many more, have received their fair share of the wealth created by the ever-increasing demand and interest in such a high-end market. There are many people out there, however, who doubt the sincerity and significance of such a complex and baffling industry.

Knoedler and Co. Art Gallery

Knoedler and Co. Art Gallery

In 2011, an extremely revered gallery, Knoedler and Co., closed due to the 32 reported illegal-dealings of paintings; which were later deemed to be forged. According to the article “Lawsuits in Knoedler Forgery Case Are Set for Trial” by Graham Bowley, the President of this gallery is about to appear in court for two separate lawsuits pertaining to multiple forgery cases at the firm. Ms. Freedman, who is the former President of Knoedler and Co., is currently being sued for the knowledge of these criminal acts, and for acting with “fraudulent intent.” Among the pieces which were forged and then sold, are famous works by Jackson Pollack, Willem De Kooning, Mark Rothko, and Robert Motherwell.

images2.-The-Art-Newspaper-Oct.-20131

 

The forged art items were sold directly to the gallery by Glafira Rosales, a Long Island art dealer. Federal officials concluded that Rosales used the legitimacy of the venerable gallery to create such authenticity of the paintings. Once the gallery took possession of these items, it was the responsibility of their own to confirm the validity of the works before selling them off. The lawyers for Ms. Freedman stated that Ms. Freedman put up her best effort to verify all the works, including having gallery staffers research about them. Additionally, Ms. Freedman said she “widely exhibited the paintings in places where their attribution could have been challenged.” Ms Freedman had even bought a few pieces herself. These short few statements regarding the forged works made me question the entire idea behind such a longstanding business.

Glafira Rosales in court

Glafira Rosales at court

When I think of great art, I think of something that has a positively lasting impression on me, rather than a direct impression on someone else. The entire art market is based off the credibility and the “eyes” of others. Regarding this case, if a certain work by Willem De Kooning did not strike me as phenomenal and remarkable, should it then be recognized as such a noteworthy and pricey piece of art? If Ms. Freedman’s accounts about the exhibition of all forged works is truthful, then it seems as if even the most renowned critics and aficionados cannot tell the difference between real works and fake works. It is here that I have the most trouble with this industry. If one is able to replicate a famous work of art, and the buyer cannot tell the difference between the real one and the fake one, then it is just puzzling as to why a buyer would pay significant sums of money for such a piece.

"Foregery"/Replications of the Mona Lisa

“Foregery”/Replications of the Mona Lisa

In my opinion, Pei Shen Qian, the mastermind and forger behind all these illegal and counterfeit pieces, is the true artist at hand. If one is able to replicate the works of such celebrated and popular artists, while many experts cannot find the smallest of differences, then that is art in itself. Imitation has proven to be a common technique in many forms of art, and painting should not be any different. It is understandable that people want the real piece that is worth value. Nonetheless, I still find the entire system to be incredibly flawed when commoners are able to fool the specialists; and in some cases get away with it—Qian has recently fled to China, and sure enough does not plan on returning anytime soon.

This scandal alone has given rise to ten civil suits in total. In an industry that is worth 66 billion dollars annually, and counting, it seems as if there is a possibility that many more instances like this will arise in the future. The question comes down to whether these activities are wholly illegal, or if they contain some artistic proficiency.

Spring Awakening Reading Response- Maxwell Sternberg

Authority is the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience. Authoritarians have giant responsibilities due to the power or control they have in their respective particular areas. The areas in which there is an authority is boundless. If one looks around the world we live in, whether it is in politics, education, family structures, working environments, sporting teams, societies, clubs, etc., it is clearly evident that authorities play a large role. It is a great debate what makes one a great authority, and if there is a set system or solution of how to be the ideal authority.

 

djdPicture1

After reading Spring Awakening, by Frank Wedekind, an underlying theme which struck me instantly was the difficulties and problems with authoritarian figures. Wedekind clearly went out of his way to satirize the different types of authority figures in his play.

Mrs. Bergmann, Mrs. Gabor, Martha’s parents, Ilse’s parents, Pastor Skinnytum, and the teachers, all have one common similarity: substandard leadership. Wedekind utilizes each character to show their different inadequacies.

jdjsk

With such a wide range of different authoritarians, and their blatant ill advised methods of ruling, it is obvious that Wedekind must have found the rulers of his time significantly frustrating; all the figures that show any sense of leadership prove to be misrepresenting their role by the end of the novel.

Wedekind’s dissatisfaction with the leaders of his time are completely relatable. To me it seems as if throughout the world, leaders are making complete fools of themselves. Nowadays, politics has turned into a giant game, and power is the reward for winning it. Ruling should not be about winners and losers, but rather, it should be about creating a fair and useful governance. Wedekind was clearly way ahead of his time predicting the horrible, and disastrous leaders that would affect the world in the coming years. Even nowadays, I feel as though Wedekind’s critiques still strongly apply. Whether we are talking about the totalitarian government in North Korea, or the unstable regime ruling Syria, this world is filled with incompetent authorities. Even in the country we live in, there seems to be a lack of leadership and ruling. Instead of worrying about the degree of power people should have or use, we should be worrying about the actual people that are filling these positions of power and if their system of ruling will have positive or negative impacts.

jsfsjfjhfgh

Obviously, authorities have huge impacts on the world, and the generations to come. It is time that we take a step back and take authority for what it truly is. Let us not be involved in the frivolous game that our current leaders play, and rather, let us look for genuine, practical authorities which will give beneficial guidance and assistance.

ryr

Believing in moderate leadership by authorities, openness to information and change, greater compassion, and more meaning to life, Wedekind felt he discovered just a few key components for better authority, and hopefully a better world to live in.

Maxwell Sternberg: Protest Mural Draws Its Own Protest

What makes art unique is two very crucial characteristics: the boundless degree of freedom, and the importance of self interpretation. Many feel that it is one’s natural right to produce any work of art due to these inherent features. However, this all gets a bit more complicated when one’s self interpretation is in direct conflict with another’s freedom to produce.

Currently, there is an international campaign gaining traction mainly in London and New York. This campaign, which is centered around mural based artworks, is a way for people to express protest over the jailing of a female Iranian illustrator, Atena Farghadani. Farghadani was convicted for depicting her local politicians as she perceived them- as animals.

Atena Farghadani

Atena Farghadani

This movement uses art as a way to communicate dissent over the restrictions and limitations of human liberties in Iran. So when Faith47, an acclaimed artist part of the campaign, approached Wylie Goodman about using one of her walls as a canvas for a new work, she gladly agreed. Ms. Goodman’s building stands tall in Red Hook, New York, her permanent residence. Unfortunately, the mural has been involved in protest, vandalism, and public unrest lately. Many of the local residents have expressed opposition to the mural in a wide variety of ways. After much consideration, Goodwin has capitulated, and decided to paint over the mural.

The mural, standing at 27 feet, depicts approximately half of a woman’s face, with her mouth nowhere to be found. The woman can easily be identified as Iranian due to the Niqab, or more commonly known as the Iranian head scarf.

Mural in Red Hook, NY, created by Faith47

Mural in Red Hook, NY, created by Faith47

To some, the apparent identification of an Iranian character is excessively disrespectful and inappropriate. They feel that the mural is reminiscent, and clearly associated with 9/11 terror attacks, which took place just a few miles away in 2001.

9/11 Rememberance

9/11 Rememberance

Upon my first reading of this situation, I was appalled by the irony. This remarkable campaign, along with this specific piece of work, is being protested due to self interpretation by many local residents. The evident paradox is that the campaign itself is concentrated on the belief that every person has innate rights, which includes the freedom to interpret various subjects however they see fit.

Rationally speaking, there are arguments to be made from both sides of the spectrum. To me though, it is clear cut which side has a logical approach, and which side does not. People certainly have the right to decide how they view any work of art. Nevertheless, it is my belief that to have a justified opinion, one must go ahead and do extra research and investigation on the subject at hand. If the residents did not just jump to their premature opinions, and rather did their own due diligence, then they would have discovered the truth behind the creation. They would have seen the painting as the spectacular, legitimate, extensive piece of art that it is. When a movement has such a positive, encouraging meaning behind it, there should be no grounds for objection or dispute. Beyond that, the residents of Red Hook, NY, were acting out of a sense of racism, and unjustified motivation. If we as a people are going to judge people based on the way they look, the people they are linked with, or the place they come from, then how are we any different than the ones who locked up Atena Farghadani in the first place. For us to live in a democracy with freedoms, there must be a balance between liberty and justification.

images-1

Thanks to Colin Moynihan, and his article “In Brooklyn, A Protest Mural Draws Its Own Protest,” I am now familiar with Faith47 and the movement to which she has partaken in. Even though Wylie Goodman could not handle the frequent vandalism and disapproval, she deserves great admiration and courage for taking the initiative to be part of such a great campaign. Hopefully in the future Faith47 can continue to spread the message of international solidarity on free speech; except from now on she should be able to operate with the natural human rights this movement fights for.

“Every Portrait Tells a Lie” & “How John Singer Sargent Made a Scene” Reading Response

The common saying goes: a picture is worth a thousand words. Whether those words tell a lie or not is a whole different question. Debra Brehmer’s essay, “Every Portrait Tells a Lie”, discusses this exact problem of portraiture. Brehmer expresses her feeling that portraits tell a lie due to the fact that they are in a “tug of war between the objective or subjective or between likeness and interpretation.” What Brehmer most has a problem with is the fact that what a portrait may seem to be in an artistic form, may be entirely different in reality. She compares this to a Christmas photograph taken of her and her bother; while within the frame the siblings looked as if they were happy go-lucky, the two tended to not get along.

Christmas Sibling Picture-within the lens

Christmas Sibling Picture-within the lens

Brehmer blames this lie on the theory that her father was motivated by a hopeful vision of a happy-family. This idea seems extremely relatable. There are countless times throughout my childhood where I must put a smile on for the camera. This goes without saying that majority of the time I already have a smile on my face, and there is no reason to pretend to be exuberant. However, many wretched experiences in life are replicated as happy times in distorted pictures.

Christmas Sibling Picture-out of the lens

Christmas Sibling Picture-out of the lens

Furthermore, Brehmer believes that portraiture is a bit of an impossibility. When an artist tries to accurately depict a subject, Brehmer believes that a portrait is set up for failure due to the impossibility of capturing a precise fleeting moment and portrayal.

However, it seems as if these two problems exposed by Brehmer reveal what it takes to be a genius of an artist. To reach such greatness, an artist must need a personal style, only subjective to one’s own interpretations; and a courageous, dauntless character who is only satisfied by his or her own perfection. Sara Churchwell depicts such an artist in her essay, “How John Singer Sargent Made a Scene.” Churchwell quotes Henry James as saying, “Sargent was remarkable for the extraordinarily immediate translation of his perception into a picture.” John Singer Sargent seems as if he possessed these crucial attributes. Sargent was made to be anachronistic of his era. Though this may seem sort of unpleasant in the moment, I see this as being a revolutionary, and an innovator of his time. Sargent saw things in his own way, and even depicted them that way too. This is why his realism became true modernism. His contemporaries may have seen things in their personal view, but they only presented them in a traditional manner; which shortly became erroneous realism as time obviously moves on.

Sargent “brought to an apparently conventional realism an experimental sensibility, exploring psychology, narrative and identity.” In effect, John was able to create scenes straight out of his own vision. His genius renditions were exalted by so many, but mainly not until after his years; that was the consequence of being such a sincere pioneer of his time.

Lily, Lily, Rose (1886)

Lily, Lily, Rose (1886)

Lily, Lily, Rose (1886), is a piece of Sargent’s which exemplifies his commitment and fervor for his pieces. He saw scenes in his own way, and recreated these scenes in whatever way it took for him to make them authentic. It is on record that Sargent used to walk around the scene he was creating countless times, just to capture the right vision. For this specific work, Sargent borrowed the technique of Monet, and spent two years working on one piece just to capture the precise lighting. It is this type of effort and passion which I admire most of Sargent. Not only does it take the innate mastery to envision and recreate, but also one must put the work in to perfect his or her own work.

Sarah Churchwell relates the true nature of Sargent, and how he was way before his time. Sargent was not only a gifted artist, but he was also an innovator, a diligent worker, an intellectual, and a genuine professional. Due to all these traits I believe Mr. Sargent was able to overcome the deceptions of common portraiture that Debra Brehmer describes of.

 

« Older posts

© 2024 New York Scenes

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑