Category: Reading Responses (Page 9 of 11)

Achen Response2

As Brehmer profoundly points out, “Portraiture is the only art form that exists out of a dependency on human exchange and models the struggles and pleasures of human relationships as a subtext to its surface desire to represent.” Indeed, portraits encapsulate a moment in time forever such as Picasso’s portrait of Getrude Stein.  Life is short for humankind, but any photograph or artwork may capture the special quality and aura during an important time period that defines the individual and his surroundings. It may not tell us the whole truth, but it is enough to engage the viewer to ponder deeply on his or her characteristics. What I also took from Brehmer’s Every Portrait Tells a Lie, is that time is a precious commodity, especially in the modern era. Students have to manage their time wisely for exams, occupations, and social life. Athletes and artists alike must spend a majority of their career perfecting their talents to strive for greatness. Time will never stop, but portraits allow us to look back and reflect upon the moments that we cherish.

Casper Goodrich by Sargent

In Sarah Churchwell’s How John Singer Sargent made a scene, many more interesting facts about Sargent were revealed. Some of the more striking qualities about him is that he liked to do many activities while he painted great works such as walking around for “four miles” from his model and easel, and playing the piano or tennis. He also tried to capture en plein air, the transient quality of “fugitive evening light” when he painted. I felt this is similar to how Frans Hals painted when he was drunk. It is really interesting how certain cues in the surroundings of an artist sparks even greater landscapes of creativity. What was unnerving about Sargent’s life was how society critiqued him after spending much thought and imagination into  his masterpieces. Sargent was also “married” in a sense to his artistic ability and painting, and it was depressing how he did not maintain any stable relationships. His personal life seemed to be very mysterious, and many of his private papers were destroyed. His own self-portrait seems to generate ambition and a headstrong demeanor.

The Other-side of John Singer Sargent (Reading Response 9/10)

There is no doubt in many people’s minds that John Singer Sargent was a very talented painter, but his paintings hold a greater story than what we can see through his works. Though he possessed a gift that only so many could be born with, he was very secretive and enjoyed his personal life to be private. In a way he was a bit “snobby” because he thrived to paint portraits of wealthy people, but his personality tended him to be extremely shy in public. It seems as if he did his artwork to get recognized for the highly technical skill that he had acquired, rather than doing his art for pure enjoyment and creativity. He was a performer in the art world and often did what people wanted him to do, portraits. As a result, it was hard for him to experiment with his artwork until later in his career.  His portraits allow us to take glimpse of how John Singer Sargent was feeling and how his subjects were feeling through various aspects of each of his paintings. For example, we can examine the color choice, expressions of the subject, the brush strokes and time at which he painted the portrait. We may see him as this person with masterful skill in painting and we tend to forget that John Singer Sargent is also a human with flaws.

mastering_the_art_of_technical_communication_hero

His life may seem as if it was painted with perfect brush strokes with the right amount of pressure and finesse, but was it really? For him to paint at such a high magnitude he must’ve lacked in some other area. As discussed in the article, John Singer Sargent wasn’t ever married and usually kept all his thoughts behind closed doors. There are tons of people in the world with many different “disabilities,” such as autism and dyslexia. Society has deemed these people to be “stupid”, but some of the most intelligent and successful have these “disabilities.” Why is that? These people were forced to live their lives in an unconventional manner and take on life in a different manner to cope with their problems. John Singer Sargent must’ve had “something” that made him tick, he lost the ability to communicate in public well, but in return he was able to paint like no other.

9be6a7ce96e1f1ae124e2a02ce8e8d48

It is safe to say that John Singer Sargent has lived a life with more accomplishments than most people will ever do in their lifetime. His works told stories that prophesied modern society, he declined the honor of knighthood, and his artwork’s style was ahead of his time (a “hipster”). John Singer Sargent under any definition will consist of paintings that were simplistically realistic to the eye, but held stories greater than 1000 words. His work may not seem to be super innovative, but he knew how to paint portraits better than anyone  else during his time.

“Every Portrait Tells A Lie” And “How John Singer Sargent Made A Scene”

There is no standing still because time is moving forward.” (Gregory Lake) This quote captures the crux of what Debra Brehmer is trying to relay; nothing is still or permanent, everything and everyone is always changing, so make the most of every second because it will never come back. Portraiture, especially through the use of photography, is an unusual art form in which a snapshot, frozen in time, is created to last forever. The atmosphere, the time, and the emotions present in a photograph can never be exactly repeated. Portraits attempt to distill these elements. We should look back from time to time to see how we have grown and what has changed but we need to remember to move forward because “time is moving forward.”

I can personally relate to the idea of making the most of every second through my athletic experiences. My coaches drilled the idea of forgetting the past, and forgetting the future, and just giving maximum effort and attention to every moment that is now. Athletics are a prime example of the unrelenting march of time. A fraction of a second is the difference between winning and losing. After the game, from experience, I can tell you that the losing side discusses everything they could have done different in those seconds that would have changed the ultimate outcome, the losing team wishes they can relive those precious few seconds. But time just keeps moving forward.

As an athlete I have learned the importance of maximizing every second, and as I transition to college and being a student full time, many of the same principles apply. The time spent watching netflix or sleeping in before a test cannot be changed no matter how madly you wish to go back to that time and make yourself study. The concept of time management is an essential key for everyone to master so that we can limit the regrets we have with how we spent our time. I am learning to never let a second go to waste, I am learning to use every second I have to my benefit. Instead of playing 2048 on the train to and from school, I am reading textbooks. Instead of watching netflix all night, I am, albeit resentfully, trying to get to sleep on time. Instead of dazing off in class and having to study twice as much to retain the material, I am focusing on the lesson.

I would like to add that I thought that art, and the discussion of art, and the reactions to art were a waste of time, but after seeing the degree to which my reflections to these artworks allow me to open up to myself, I am beginning to truly admire art. Sarah Churchwell stated that “art is the perfect empathy,” but it is an abstract paradoxical idea to grasp. The paradox in the notion that art is tool to understand and share the feelings of another is the idea that one painting, a singular image for all, can empathize diverse feelings for every viewer.

“Every Portrait Tells a Lie” & “How John Singer Sargent Made a Scene” Reading Response

The common saying goes: a picture is worth a thousand words. Whether those words tell a lie or not is a whole different question. Debra Brehmer’s essay, “Every Portrait Tells a Lie”, discusses this exact problem of portraiture. Brehmer expresses her feeling that portraits tell a lie due to the fact that they are in a “tug of war between the objective or subjective or between likeness and interpretation.” What Brehmer most has a problem with is the fact that what a portrait may seem to be in an artistic form, may be entirely different in reality. She compares this to a Christmas photograph taken of her and her bother; while within the frame the siblings looked as if they were happy go-lucky, the two tended to not get along.

Christmas Sibling Picture-within the lens

Christmas Sibling Picture-within the lens

Brehmer blames this lie on the theory that her father was motivated by a hopeful vision of a happy-family. This idea seems extremely relatable. There are countless times throughout my childhood where I must put a smile on for the camera. This goes without saying that majority of the time I already have a smile on my face, and there is no reason to pretend to be exuberant. However, many wretched experiences in life are replicated as happy times in distorted pictures.

Christmas Sibling Picture-out of the lens

Christmas Sibling Picture-out of the lens

Furthermore, Brehmer believes that portraiture is a bit of an impossibility. When an artist tries to accurately depict a subject, Brehmer believes that a portrait is set up for failure due to the impossibility of capturing a precise fleeting moment and portrayal.

However, it seems as if these two problems exposed by Brehmer reveal what it takes to be a genius of an artist. To reach such greatness, an artist must need a personal style, only subjective to one’s own interpretations; and a courageous, dauntless character who is only satisfied by his or her own perfection. Sara Churchwell depicts such an artist in her essay, “How John Singer Sargent Made a Scene.” Churchwell quotes Henry James as saying, “Sargent was remarkable for the extraordinarily immediate translation of his perception into a picture.” John Singer Sargent seems as if he possessed these crucial attributes. Sargent was made to be anachronistic of his era. Though this may seem sort of unpleasant in the moment, I see this as being a revolutionary, and an innovator of his time. Sargent saw things in his own way, and even depicted them that way too. This is why his realism became true modernism. His contemporaries may have seen things in their personal view, but they only presented them in a traditional manner; which shortly became erroneous realism as time obviously moves on.

Sargent “brought to an apparently conventional realism an experimental sensibility, exploring psychology, narrative and identity.” In effect, John was able to create scenes straight out of his own vision. His genius renditions were exalted by so many, but mainly not until after his years; that was the consequence of being such a sincere pioneer of his time.

Lily, Lily, Rose (1886)

Lily, Lily, Rose (1886)

Lily, Lily, Rose (1886), is a piece of Sargent’s which exemplifies his commitment and fervor for his pieces. He saw scenes in his own way, and recreated these scenes in whatever way it took for him to make them authentic. It is on record that Sargent used to walk around the scene he was creating countless times, just to capture the right vision. For this specific work, Sargent borrowed the technique of Monet, and spent two years working on one piece just to capture the precise lighting. It is this type of effort and passion which I admire most of Sargent. Not only does it take the innate mastery to envision and recreate, but also one must put the work in to perfect his or her own work.

Sarah Churchwell relates the true nature of Sargent, and how he was way before his time. Sargent was not only a gifted artist, but he was also an innovator, a diligent worker, an intellectual, and a genuine professional. Due to all these traits I believe Mr. Sargent was able to overcome the deceptions of common portraiture that Debra Brehmer describes of.

 

The Psychological of Art and “Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose”

 

 

“…the photographer or artist imposes their reality on the picture…” Debra Brehmer, in her article “Every Portrait Tells a Lie,”  compared taking a photo to painting a portrait. To serve as an example, she brings up an anecdote of how her father took a picture of her and her brother in front of the large Christmas tree.In his attempt to create an idealized image, which displays the reality that he wants, her father is essentially creating a lie. Her father, in attempt to create an idealized image, which displays the reality that he wants, is essentially creating a lie. Debra Brehmer doesn’t blame her father for it, but she seems to admire the humanistic wants and needs in which she states “Portraiture wants what cannot be had: Life to stop without being dead.” Camera-icon

 

The concept is not rare. Many people “pose” in pictures because they want to remember the good times, not the bad. They take pictures for memories, or more specifically, “good” memories.Of course, I can’t speak for those who find the need to take a selfie every hour as if their looks were changing by the hour and they must hold on to the precious moment of each change.

This concept is not only an artistic concept, but also a psychological concept. I say that based off of my own experience. I’ve always wondered why my family members always ask me to smile every time we take a picture. Most of the times, I don’t really feel like smiling.  I’ve never been a big fan of smiling at the Camera because that’s just weird. Why would I smile for no reason? It’s just so unnatural. Now, I see why my family members always tell me to smile during pictures: in order to portray the idea of a “happy family.”

 

John_Singer_Sargent_-_Carnation,_Lily,_Lily,_Rose_-_Google_Art_Project

 

The article “How John Singer Sargent made a scene” is a summary of the praise and criticisms he received.  It explores in detail of Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose which was painted in the late summer of 1885 and 1886. Sargent stated that the painting was meant to capture, air open air, “the transient quality of ‘fugitive evening light.'” The painting took him 2 years to finish and interestingly, he only painted for 25 minutes each night, according to the article. From the painting, I feel the calmness and tranquility of the night. The two children in white reminds of purity and innocence. The roses and lilies are blooming. Even from the picture, I can smell the fresh scent of forest air, which is lightly enriched by the scent of the flowers.

 

Citations:

Debra Brehmer, “Every Portrait Tells a Lie”

Sarah Churchwell, “How John Singer Sargent Made a Scene”

John Singer Sargent

John Singer Sargent was a profoundly young and self-defined artist. During his twenties, Sargent built and established a unique name for himself, working from his own thought and without much regard to the pressure of those around him. With perceptions and inspiration gathered from his many travels across the art-world, he combined his own realism and the impressionism of the time (Paris c. 1880s) to create incredible and seemingly under-appreciated portraits very consistent in their techniques and style.

Young Lady in Black (1879)

Young Lady in Black (1879)

The main aspect of Sargent’s work that caught my attention was the life and brightness that comprised each portrait. Every brushstroke has a purpose in bringing light and animation to the almost still photography stretched across his canvases. I find myself admiring much of the simplistic beauty that resonates across his work. Henry James, author of “Picture and Text,” puts it perfectly as he describes the Lady in Black: “Out of these few elements the artist has constructed a picture which it is impossible to forget, of which the most striking characteristic is its simplicity, and yet which overflows with perfection” (p.4). At such a young age, I am thoroughly impressed with his successes and aesthetic abilities.

One quote that really resonated with me while reading “Picture and Text,” was describing Sargent’s talent at impressing a wide audience with his style of work: “It is not only a portrait, but a picture, and it arouses even in the profane spectator something of the painter’s sense, the joy of engaging also, by sympathy, in the solution of the artistic problem” (p.3). Sargent conceived beauty capable of satisfying all eyes and preferences, something not even many of those older than him could do.

Not only does James consider his work to be a pleasure to most- if not all- audiences in some way or another, but he also describes Sargent’s portraits as timeless; they could last through generations without losing their effect. This is one of the many positives of painting with such authenticity as he did. “The picture has this sign of productions of the first order, that its style clearly would save it if everything else should change–our measure of its value of resemblance, its expression of character, the fashion of dress, the particular associations it evokes” (p.3).

A man made and remembered in his twenties, John Singer Sargent went beyond the bounds of his time to produce the cultured visions reflected in his portraits. It’s artists like him that will continue to inspire all audiences and artists alike through his passion and unmistakable talent. His story encourages one to follow their imagination, and, as Henry James points out, “remind[s] people that the faculty of taking a direct, independent, unborrowed impression is not altogether lost” (p.11).

John Singer Sargent: The Italian, French, American Man

Self Portrait

An artist’s childhood often has a way of protruding into his later works. This is clearly the case with “American artist” John Singer Sargent who was born to American parents in Europe. As a first generation Italian in and American household, he was exposed to a diverse field of art. Adding to his exposure, at the influenceable age of eighteen, Sargent moved to Paris to study art under the prevailing portraitist of late nineteenth century France, Carolus-Duran. According to Barbara Weinberg, under Duran, Sargent studied the works and techniques of Rembrandt, Sir Anthony van Dyck, and Velazquez, who’s impressions upon him are evident in the majority of Sargent’s works. Ultimately influenced by the American exposure of his mother, the Italian style of his childhood, and the French style of his early adulthood, Sargent emerged with a painting style unique to his circumstances.

The evolution of John Singer Sargent’s style clearly represents his process of finding an identity- a difficult take having been exposed to many cultures while growing up. Whereas some of his early works focus on the trending art movement of the time -impressionism- his later works diverge from the common convention of the time and instead focus on his original take on realism, a combination of the various art styles he studied.

Oyster Gatherers of Cancale

The Night Watch

One of Sargent’s earliest salon works, the Oyster Gatherers of Cançale, conforms to the impressionist movement of the time. While Sargent does employ the popular style in this work, he does so with his own unique take as he painted the image without sketching it first. I enjoy the dreamy color pallet and strong contrast of the peoples clothing against the bright background. Additionally the decrease in detail as the subjects shift from the foreground to the mid ground is admirable as it mirrors a persons vision in reality, giving a strong sense of depth and distance.

Sargent’s work El Jaleo clearly demonstrates influence from Rembrandt’s northern renaissance style. A key characteristic to Rembrandt’s paintings, particularly in The Night Watch,  was motion within the scene that is also evident in El Jaleo. According to Henry James’ “Picture and Text,” El Jaleo, while a representation of a scene in motion, is a “perversion of life,” that leaves the audience unsettled. I disagree fully with this interpretation of Sargent’s work. El Jaleo, is a interesting take on the multifaceted nature of art. It does not

El Jaleo

exist only in the form of painting, but also in music and dance among others. This work captures the art of song and dance within a painting revealing the complexity of art in every day life. The rustic nature of the building along with the guitars of the musicians and the castanets of the dancer, allow the audience to almost hear the music emanating from the painting. The ugliness that James describes is merely part of the representation of the scene and should be taken as that. The painting was not meant to be perfectly refined as it was a representation of everyday art and festivities as opposed to the lavish and religious Fumee D’Ambris Gris he felt better represented Sargent’s talent.

Ultimately, while drawing influence from the art he was exposed to while developing his career, Sargent clearly developed his own unique style, focusing on art as a lens through which to view everyday life.

Reading Response- John Singer Sargent/Picture and Text

Through this reading assignment, I was able to learn about the life and accomplishments of John Singer Sargent, a prominent and well-known artist. Born in Florence to American parents, Sargent proved to be a very determined and aspiring young man. Despite his “Baedeker education”, Sargent developed to be a talented individual; He played the piano and learned to speak multiple languages. By the age of 16, Sargent was enrolled in his first formal art training class, and a few months later, was taken to Paris to continue and pursue his talent. Through guidance of many prestigious artists, Sargent quickly grasped the art of painting, and by the age of 20, was already working on building his own artistic career.

What I found so inspiring about Sargent’s biography was how quickly his artistic career evolved, and how distinguished he became at such a young age. Much of his rapid progress was due to his supportive parents, who not only encouraged him to draw, but his father even moved him to Paris (which the article states that it “had become the world’s most powerful magnet for art students”). All that proved to be worthwhile, as Sargent is now to known to have created many acclaimed paintings, murals, and watercolors.

While reading “Picture and Text”, I quickly picked up on how fondly Henry James spoke of John Singer Sargent and of his artwork. He chooses a few of his favorite works of Sargant’s, and shares his thoughts on each piece. When I first opened this document, I went straight to look at the paintings to explore my own understanding of the paintings. The two paintings I was instantly drawn to were “Young Lady in Black” and “Incensing the Veil”.

For “Young Lady in Black” I was struck with (at least what I thought) the contradiction between the subject’s facial expression and the setting of the portrait. On first glimpse, the painting seemed to have an almost “proper” and “royal” aura to it, but her face seemed to depict otherwise. Though she wears a fine outfit and is seen holding a delicate flower, her facial expression (specifically her mouth) and her body position (the arm bent back, rested on her hip) exhibit slight impatience. I would agree most with James when he says that “the face is young, candid, and peculiar”.

Unknown

When I came upon the painting “Incensing the Veil”, I immediately questioned it. Who is the subject of the painting? What is she doing? Where is she? I wasn’t really able to answer these questions on my own, but I feel somewhat content knowing that James (who has a deep and rich understanding for the arts) is confused as well when he says, “I know not who this stately Mahometan may be, nor in what mysterious domestic or religious rite she may be engaged…”.

incensing-veil-171_34607

Both of these paintings caught my attention because the meaning (or my interpretation of it, at least) was not immediately evident. This intrigued me and drew me in to try and better understand the wonderful paintings that Sargent drew.

 

“John Singer Sargent” and “Picture and Text” Reading Response

There are a plethora of forms of visual art, and within each form there are categories and subcategories that are specialized by the styles and impressions of various artists. For example, John Singer Sargent greatly influenced the art of impressionism through his distinct and powerful technique. According to the essay “John Singer Sargent”, written by H. Barbara Weinberg, Sargent was born to American parentSargent,_John_SInger_(1856-1925)_-_Self-Portrait_1907_bs, however, was raised in Europe for the entirety of his childhood. Through the diversity of his specific schooling, Singer discovered an interest in art, and his parents chose to support him in his endeavors to pursue his passion.

Sargent first enrolled in formal art training in Florence, however, was then sent to Paris by his ambitious father. There he studied under the tutelage of Carolus-Duran.

The most information that can be discovered about Sargent as an artist, however, can only be seen through his medium of artwork and artistic style. This is discussed in the essay “Picture and Text”, by Henry James, where various pieces painted by Sargent are analyzed, and  how each of them help expose more about him as an artist is described.

Whilst reading through James’ analysis of Sargent’s portraits and paintings, the concept of impressionism and the description of how Sargent contributed to impressionism struck me. What made Sargent so influential was that his artwork was very specific to himself. Rather than mirroring structure that was taught to him, the way that he painted was distinctly his personality. James wrote that “it is difficult to imagine a young painter less in the dark about his own ideal…” (2). To me, the thought that through expression of one’s true self there is tremendous outcome and, ultimately, success, as seen through the Sargent’s artwork left me with a surprising feeling of inspiration.

Also in James’ essay, the depiction of the process that Sargent uses to express himself through impressionism, to me, added a dimension to the creative process as a whole. James’ wrote that as an artist, the most impressive results come from  when an artist looks “deep into his subject, undergoes it, absorbs it, discovers in it new things that were not on the surface” (11). Therefore, the goal is not to recreate the most realistic portrait, but to inhale the subject with every sense of the body, allow it to evolve within the limits of perception, and portray the resulting visual and emotion through a medium. This idea left me in a deeply pensive state as I wondered how my perception of a subject can evolve within my thoughts to develop dimensions of reality, emotion and personality.

My favorite pincensing-veil-171_34607ainting out of those that I experienced in James’ essay was Incensing the Veil”, an oil painting that depicts a woman in a white robe and veil, with incense at her feet. The setting is mostly white, disregarding the colors of the carpet that the woman is standing on. There is a silent beauty that emanates from the scene. In fact, in his essay, James uses this piece as an example of direct contrast to Sargent’s El Jaleo, a painting depicting a danger surrounded by musicians, that “sins… in the direction of ugliness” (6). The the muted color scheme of the painting embodies a sensation of modesty and pure beauty.

John Singer Sargent to this day maintains a reputation as an artist that influenced art culture through his individual style. The future of his work is greatly anticipated.

John Singer Sargent

John Singer Sargent had a very unorthodox, yet cosmopolitan upbringing; he learned three languages, and was exposed to subjects such as geography, arithmetic and reading. But although his father was his main professor throughout his early education, it was his mother’s proposal for him to draw that led Sargent to become of the world’s most renown artists. From his original training in Paris, to his permanent residence in England, to his intense popularity among the American public, John Singer Sargent immersed himself in a lifestyle that most artists today could only dream of.

Had it not been for his mother’s encouragement, we wouldn’t have been exposed to two of my favorite portraits by Sargent: Madame X and Lady with the Rose. The paintings have many similarities; Both were completed in 1884, the paintings’ main subject is a lady in a black dress, the paintings both host a dull background, and both women are dressed elegantly. But what makes the two paintings stand out are the stark differences in the stories they seem to tell.

At face value, Madame X reminds me of Marilyn Monroe: beautiful, playful, classic. She is facing away from the artist painting her, possibly to reflect an indecisive demeanor. Based on her body language, I would think she has a bubbly personality, someone who would giggle in an uncomfortable situation to lighten the mood. The woman seems to be wearing a very flirtatious dress for 1884, shoulders fully exposed. But oddly enough, it wasn’t what the woman was wearing that sparked controversy among the French public, it was Sargent’s “indifference to conventions of pose, modeling, and treatment of space,” as the article “John Singer Sargent” so eloquently put. She seems to enjoy being painted, standing in a very dramatic pose, contrary to France’s beliefs. The elegance of this woman is unparalleled by the woman in Lady with the Rose. However, the latter gives off a much more interesting personality.

Madame X(1884)

Madame X, 1884

On the opposite side of the spectrum, the woman pictured in Lady with the Rose gives off a no-nonsense glare into her painter’s soul. She reminds me of Whoopi Goldberg: straightforward, opinionated, unrelenting. She seems to have incredible strength and determination and has no time for nonsense. Her arm placed sternly on her hip makes it look like she’s saying “Are you finished yet? I’ve got things to do.” In “Picture and Text,” Henry James highlights the woman’s “arm somewhat extended, offer[ing] to view a single white flower.” The flower seems somewhat forced upon her, pinched between her fingers as if it were some sort of disease. I believe this flower represents her opposing views on the societal norms of how a female should behave in 1884. She seems to have no fear of repercussions in stating an opinion and she doesn’t need a man to keep her satisfied. She resembles a completely different character than the woman in Madame X, and to me, a much more interesting one.

Unknown

Lady with a Rose, 1884

Even besides these two portraits, after reading about and viewing his other works in “Picture and Text,” I admire Sargent’s ability to capture real and raw emotion within a canvas. His simplicity and candid expression make his work both enjoyable yet though-provoking. The article “John Singer Sargent” assures the reader that he had many, many American fans, and after browsing through his work for the first time, I can assure you that he has gained one more.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 New York Scenes

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑