Author: Chris Angelidis (Page 1 of 2)

Mediterranea Review

Over the past few years, the American media has been riddled with accounts of racial violence. As much as America would like to pride herself of being egalitarian, these recent atrocities reveal that in many cases, Blacks are still treated as second class citizens. The Western media rarely covers stories of Black mistreatment in other countries, and, as such, one is led to believe that this abuse occurs only within the U.S. This silence, however, reveals just how bad this problem is internationally, as each day hundreds of people become victims of racial violence and are left without a voice. Jonas Carpignano’s Mediterranea speaks for these victims when the media will not and questions the extent to which this racial injustice is an American problem, suggesting that it instead is a global one.

Mediterranea is an independent movie presented by Sundance Selects that opened on November 20th 2015 and is currently playing at the IFC Center in Greenwich Village. It is written, produced, and directed by Jonas Carpignano. The movie first premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in France and was a big hit. The film takes the audience through the lives of two African migrants, Ayiva and Abas, seeking a better life in Italy, who run into obstacles at every leg of their journey. These protagonists are played by Koudous Seihon and Alassane Sy, respectively. They are talked down to, they are lied to, they are robbed, they are evicted, and they are beaten. Even their fellow Blacks hurt them at various times during the movie. Indeed, these two young men just can’t seem to get a break.

In the IFC Center’s relatively large theatre one, the ambient sound effects of the movie resonate off of the hard brick walls and truly surround the audience. At one point, Ayiva and Abas find themselves caught in a thunderstorm while on a dinghy in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea. The visuals themselves are quite disturbing, but the sounds of the waves and the thunder powerfully convey the disparity of the migrants in that boat. With every wave, the boat comes closer and closer to capsizing. Audience members literally jump in their seats when the first bolt of lightning strikes with thunder echoing across the room. The characters’ screams are covered by the warlike sounds of the battle between the sky and the sea. Being that this is the migrants’ first encounter with Europe, the event foreshadows the challenges that await them on the other side.

In the film, Carpignano creates a contrast between how individuals treat the migrants and how groups treat them. Most every time Ayiva and Abas encounter a hardship, it is brought upon them by a group of people. This phenomenon is most clearly seen by the reappearing group of Italian youth. They are roughly the same age as Ayiva and his friends; however, they are constantly causing trouble for Ayiva’s group. The Italian group consistently takes advantage of the impoverished Black women in Ayiva’s group and pays them for sex. Having no regard for them as humans, the Italian youth sexually harasses them in front of their friends, provoking conflict. The majority of the times that Ayiva and Abas encounter kindness, it is from an individual. This trend can most clearly be see from Mama Africa, played by Norina Ventre, who created a home for migrants to live in while they get settled. Her name comes from her reputation among newcomers who view her as their European mother because they left their biological mother behind in Africa. She feeds Ayiva and Abas and helps them find work so that they can stand on their own two feet. The contrast in the two treatments reflects the danger of mob mentality and reveals that it is the root of racism and discrimination.

In a chilling scene towards the end of the film, a group of migrants protest the mistreatment of Blacks in a country that was supposed to be their paradise. They chillingly chant “stop shooting blacks” as they parade through the streets. Carrying stolen street signs that say stop and no parking, they manage to get the entire city’s attention. Angry protestors with metal pipes and molotovs destroy stores and cars. This scene bears a striking resemblance to the Ferguson riots that flooded the media last year, and, as such, Carpignano’s attempt to raise awareness for the global racism that still plagues Blacks today is successful.

Western films nowadays are often filled with Hollywood’s notorious happy endings. Be it a drama, a horror movie, a romance, or an action movie, in the end, there is always closure. Mediterranea is a refreshing deviation from this archetype as the movie cuts off in the middle of a party without any clear conclusion in the plot. This ending is rightfully unsettling as the racism these migrants face on a daily basis hasn’t come to an end. A happily ever after ending would be unrealistic and take away from Carpignano’s goal to raise awareness of the mistreatment of Blacks worldwide.

Overall, the film leaves audience members appalled by the underreported treatment of migrants in Europe as well as motivated to change it. Personally, having finished the movie, I resolved to join a non-for-profit organization geared at helping migrants with their search for a better life in Europe. This is exactly the kind of response Carpignano aimed to create for his viewers—to motivate them to help those who left everything behind in exchange for a better tomorrow.

Dali Portrait Essay

Salvador Dali was one of the world’s quintessential surrealist painters. A fan of Sigmund Freud’s work in psychology, Dali sought to tap into the creativity of the unconscious. By doing so, Dali created fantastic and somewhat irrational works that still perplex audiences today. Illumined Pleasures, painted in 1929, is a forerunner for one of his more well known works, The Persistence of Memory. The earlier work is currently on display in the MoMA. It features a distortion of reality with very abstract subjects. In this work, Illumined Pleasures, Dali explores the complexity of the human psyche through his representation of faces, use of sinister content, and employment of mixed media and reveals the core of his humanist philosophy.

The acts depicted in Dali’s 1929 work are caricatures of humanity. Dali displays the malignant side of humanity through scenes of fighting, murder, and sex, as well as the benign side of humanity through scenes of conformity, resting, and questioning. The contrast between the content of each image explores the human capability to perform both atrocious evils and magnificent deeds. Dali places the benign scenes of humanity behind screens as if to suggest that in order to act in a peaceful manner, humans must cage their primal urges. The scenes of lust, violence, and murder on the other hand are uncontained, suggesting that acts of sin are natural. The middle and largest screen portrays Dali’s own decapitated head, alluding to the death of one’s person caused by rejecting the malignant parts of humanity.  This characterization of mankind reveals that Dali views man as a complex being capable of both evil and good; however, to limit himself to either extreme is to kill his own humanity. Considering that Dali himself was an atheist when he created this work, Dali could also be criticizing the Christian rejection of sin.

Three faces tower over all the scenes in the work: one of a man, one of a beast, and one of a beast-man. Being that Dali was largely influenced by Freud’s writings, the faces in the sky can represent the trifold nature of the human psyche—the ego, the super ego, and the id. The faces’ location above every scene, gives them a godly presence as if they control everything happening below them. Thus, Dali suggests that the balance between the three aspects of the human psyche govern the consequent scenes. The superego urges the conformity in the bottom right screen, the ego advocates the pursuit of knowledge in the bottom left screen, and the id creates the chaos in the unscreened scenes. These faces reveal that Dali was a humanist, rejecting God’s power over man and instead suggesting that man governed himself.

Dali relies on a heavily contrasting color scheme as well as strong shadows to highlight each individual scene within the chaotic whole of the work. The ground and sky of the painting are both painted in solid colors, free of any unnecessary scenery. In creating a simple portrayal of the earth, Dali draws focus to the screens that litter the landscape. Dali views the human condition as being contaminated by mental chaos. While man is surrounded by order in the world around him, his internal processes distort that reality into disorder. Overall, the colors are uniform across the canvas; however, dark shadows behind the screens further draw attention to the depictions within their frames. Additionally, an unidentified person’s shadow lays present in the foreground of the work, presumably that of the viewer. By painting the viewer into the scene, Dali wanted the audience to experience the chaos of the scene on a more personal level. Rather than looking at an arbitrary collection of images, the viewer relates the content of the work to his own inner thoughts and psyche.

Dali’s use of a small canvas and mixed media mirrors the complex nature of the human psyche. The painting itself is a small work roughly one square foot in dimension. The miniature size of the canvas makes it difficult to understand what is going on in the hectic work. As a result of this compression, the canvas forces the viewer to come close in order to examine the painting and, as such, quite literally draws him into the scene. The work relies on oil paints as well as collage in order to create its scene. The contrast between these two mediums is immediately evident. The collage stands out against the paint surrounding it, distinguishing the screens from the natural background. This contrast gives the screens a more movie-like feel, distinguishing what humanity strives to be like from what it really is. Dali has a depressed outlook on mankind—no matter who a man thinks he is, he will always be a lustful and sinful murderer.

Overall, Dali’s Illumined Pleasures, explores the Freudian ideas on the workings of human consciousness. For Dali, being human is not about stifling the primitivity of the id as social norms and institutions dictate, but rather finding a humanist balance to live a more genuine version of oneself. A person living a fulfilled life is not just ruled by a superego. He has found the balance between the id and superego and, as such, becomes an autonomous individual ruled not by the world, nor by God, but by his own mental processes. Ultimately, the work leaves the viewer wondering: Can man contain his primal instincts or will doing so be suicide? In Dali’s case, the artist’s head is still rolling.

Green Notes

The balancing of passion and practically is quintessentially the key to finding personal satisfaction. Achieving this should be the personal mission for every individual in the course of his quest for identifying life’s meaning. It is concerning and altogether heartbreaking that many, if not most, individuals over complicate this simplistic and joyous system of philosophical thought. Perhaps, we are not the first to acknowledge this but regardless it is a matter of the highest importance.

Passion versus practicality is a timeless human struggle. Webster’s Dictionary defines passion as a strong feeling of enthusiasm or excitement for something or about doing something, and defines practicality as likely to succeed and reasonable to do or use. In life’s journey, we are repeatedly faced with the choice between doing what we believe is enjoyable and meaningful and accomplishing what we believe is responsible or viable. This is evident whether it be career choices, as we portray in our short film, or the core beliefs and values that we hold dear to our hearts. The common stigma is that in life when a man choses passion over practicality, he finds himself financially deficient. On the other hand, when a man choses practicality over passion he finds himself devoting his life to an occupation that he loathes.

The problem is that reason and passion are not mutually exclusive. We find true clarity, conviction, meaning, and happiness when these two elements overlap. A man cannot limit himself to one or the other. It is never too late to reevaluate the path of life that he chooses. If he chooses perceived passion over practicality, then he should find a way to make what he loves economically viable to help sustain himself. If he chooses perceived practicality over passion, then he should find a way to make their life choices fulfilling.

The idealist in one’s self wishes to live free and follow what the heart desires; while, the clear benefits of practicality can often burn holes in this vision while shining brighter on another, less attractive path. The great news is that, by blending what you love with what you can make materialistic gain off of, you find the best compromise is no compromise at all: find both in one.

Our work begs questioning on the choices we make when pursuing a career, and whether the things we enjoy on the side should solely be just that. As you watch our short film, our work will provide insight to evaluate the future choices that you plan on making as you go through your journey of life. Be prudent in your decision making and make choices out of rational discourse. However, at the same time, remember to leave room for your warm spirit to run wild and pursue what you enjoy.

Created by: Chris, Brandon, Ahmed, Anthony, Vincent

When it comes to talking about art, the first thing that comes to mind is usually either painting, drawing, or music. An often overlooked art form, dance, is just as valid a medium of expression as these other pallets and as such, deserves recognition. What is unique about dance is that often times it is a combination of two forms: music and movement. As such dance has  large room for interpretation, allowing for the artist to explore both a piece of music as well as a theme through their movements on stage.

20th century “Black American Dance” traces its roots to the Harlem Renaissance where a great number of African American’s migrated from the rural south to the cities of the north, specifically New York City. Concentrated in Harlem, these migrants brought with them the artistic traditions of African culture. In the dense city, this artistic tradition clashed with pre-existing music and dance forms and in the process, jazz was born. This new music featured dissonant harmonies, complex rhythms, and a unique orchestration. In short, it was revolutionary. The dance mirrored the music’s progressiveness with steps in-time to the complex rhythms as well by using new, flashy moves.

Modern Black Dance features a combination of martial arts moves, traditional dances from Haiti, Jamaica, Trinidad, and Martinique, as well as steps from traditional ballet. To put it simply, it is a mashup of a whole bunch of different styles into a new, unique style. Because of Modern Black Dance’s unusual personality, it is the perfect accompaniment for Jazz which has a personality that is just as innovative.

Kyle Abraham’s dance “The Gettin” uses modern dance to not only compliment jazz music, but also to explore its themes and to expand on them as well. In the background of this work, Max Roach’s album We Insist, which was written in tribute to the 100 year anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, can be heard playing. In choreographing a dance to this song, Abraham explores the progress African American’s have made in society over the past 150 years. While they have gone a long way since the slavery of the early 19th century, there is still ground to be made. Abraham uses dance as a political and social weapon, bringing the racial problems of today to his audience’s attention. This tactic is best seen in the scene where two black men are dancing together, a white man is sitting under a tree cutting a watermelon, and two black women just sit there watching. This artistic choice is complex and prompts the audience to think about its significance.

Ultimately Kyle Abraham’s dance can be seen as more than an art-form. It is also a social statement, a trip through history, and a call for change.

The Romance of Turandot

Imagine that you see the girl of your dreams for the first time. Staring across the moonlit sky, your eyes meet and it’s love at first sight. As your gazes cross, you instantly feel that spark. While this romance might sound like a typical Romeo and Juliet love story, its true nature is much more twisted than that. That one special moment in time where you held each other’s gaze mesmerizes you and you become a prisoner to her charm. The only way to free yourself is through her love.

The story of Turandot is one of obsession. Love becomes the sole driving force behind the characters’ actions, blinding them of all common sense and reasoning. A son gambles his and his father’s lives . A servant commits suicide to help make her beloved master’s wishes come true. Dozens of men kneel to their premature deaths in exchange for a chance at loving a princess. A princess, afraid of being hurt kills her suitors as to remain immune to love’s pain. Indeed the love in Turandot is more of a disease than an enjoyable emotion. It causes men to do terribly irresponsible things and feeds the atrocities within the kingdom. This unorthodox depiction of love exaggerates love’s ability to completely drive a person’s actions. Yet the happy ending in which the unloving princess Turandot falls in love with her noble suitor Calaf reveals that despite love’s illogical nature, love is still man’s ultimate fulfillment.

The music in the opera mirrors love’s complexity. Both pieces posted on the blog are quite grand and ostentatious. Questa Regia starts in a very somber manner. The dynamics of the piece aren’t too loud and as such, there is room for the song to grow to a climax. Towards the middle of the piece, the notes become slightly dissonant and I could imagine the lyrics referring to death, the ultimate wager in exchange for the princess’ hand in marriage. The ending was quite powerful and dreamy, making me imagine the glory in solving the riddles with an empire and a princess as reward. Nessun Dorma is a very passionate piece. It beautifully conveys the love driving Calaf to risk his life in the trial. The piece itself is very hopeful and makes me believe that Calaf truly wanted the princess above all else in the world.

Ultimately I was very content with the opera. I felt certain scenes were a bit overly dramatic, but I guess that comes with it being an opera. For example, the scene where Liu kills herself left me a bit perplexed. She could have denied her knowledge of Calaf’s name and lived, but her love for Calaf was such that living without him would be worse than death. Such an exaggerated image of love is unrealistic as Calaf only smiled at Liu once which developed into her obsession towards him. This dramatization is beautiful nonetheless and moves the audience. Ultimately, this opera left me with the idea that a life without love is a fate worse than death.

Mao’s Many Faces

Immigrating to a new country can often times be difficult, frustrating, and confusing. The language is foreign, the customs are strange, and even every-day products are different. Without sacrificing some of your previous cultural values and beliefs, it will be difficult to assimilate into the new society. As sad as this process may be, its hardships provide great artistic inspiration for artists such as Zhang Hongtu.

Recently featured in the New York Times’ art section,  Zhang Hongtu is opening a new exhibit in the Queens Museum. His artwork seeks to explore “Chinese traditions and East versus West stereotypes.” Growing up in China, Hongtu was deeply influenced by his Chinese heritage. As he grew older, he became increasingly disillusioned with the country’s government. The communist regime oppressed its people and censored their artistic expression. Art’s power as a political weapon scared the government and so even those without revolutionary ambitions were punished. Ultimately fed up by this limitation, Hongtu fled the country in 1982 and entered America.

In America, Hongtu faced a culture clash as well as many common stereotypes. These hinderances were nothing compared to the censorship in China and so he became very content in this country. With his newfound freedom, Hongtu set out on getting revenge against the leader who had silenced his voice in China: Mao Zedong. According to one biography, this mindset soon became an obsession as Hongtu repeatedly painted pop art of Mao while trying to capture the “ubiquitous and hypocrisy of Mao’s image.”

Perhaps his most famous work, Quaker Oats Mao, truly captures Hongtu’s satirical goal. In this work, Hongtu took an empty Quaker Oats container and painted Mao’s face onto it with a red backdrop. The red background as well as the green hat with a star is symbolic of communism. Quaker Oat’s is one of America’s largest companies. By painting a communist symbol on an American product, Hongtu creates a paradox. It is so absurd that at first glance, I couldn’t help but laugh a bit. Putting the political context aside for a moment, the work also represents a culture clash. Instead of the typical old white male, Hongtu’s Quaker Oats box features a Chinese male. This difference prompts the viewer to question what exactly makes an American, and whether or not that characterization is based upon race.

Some of his other works feature Chinese stereotypes as a means of mocking Mao. Yet Hongtu’s statement is not against Chinese culture, but rather the government he feels is destroying it. One of his albums features paintings that are recreations of traditional Chinese works. His efforts in this album reveals a profound pride for his culture as well as an appreciation for the past.

Overall, Hongtu’s story is one of vengeance. Mao censored Hongtu’s art and so Hongtu has spent the last fifty years mocking Mao. Taking this extreme dedication into account, I would hate to get on Hongtu’s bad side.

Spring Awakening: An Awakening of the Individual

Adolescence is the most awkward and confusing time in an individual’s lifespan. He departs from the innocence and ignorance of childhood and yet doesn’t acquire the full maturity and enlightenment of adulthood. He is caught in limbo. Puberty perverts his body and thoughts and the world he once knew is suddenly turned upside-down. Frank Wedekind’s Spring Awakening, explores the difficulty of this period, amplified by the conservative ideals of the 19th century.

Wedekind explores this conflict from the teenage perspective. We are meant to sympathize with the younger characters as they hurt one-another and make mistakes. While it is easy to blame the characters for the errors they make, Wedekind redirects the blame towards the adults in the play. By trying to shelter, cultivate, and protect their children, they ultimate create the means for their children’s demise.  The effect of this effort by the parents is magnified by the microcosmic setting of the play, with the entire play taking place within a single town and the forest surrounding it. In this environment, the pressures placed upon the children and their effects become very apparent.

Each child becomes a caricature of the different pressures and new emotions placed upon and experienced by adolescents as they embark on their transition into adulthood. Wendla’s story is based around abstinence, Moritz’s is based around academic achievement, Ernst’s is based around sexuality, and Melchior’s is based around sexual exploration. These caricatures are juxtaposed by Martha who is forced into submission by her abusive parents and by Ilse who escaped from the pressures of that society by going on to live a bohemian and promiscuous lifestyle.

The tragic outcomes of most of the stories reveal the impact of these harsh confines on the developing child. They amplify the anxiety and confusion already faced because of development. They draw Moritz to kill himself, Wendla to be unaware of her rape, and Melchior to abandon his society in search of a better alternative. While promoting virtuous christian values, the adults in this play ultimately trigger the tragedy that unfolds. The devil’s controversial appearance at the end of the play furthers this point as Melchior follows him into the uncertainty of secular individualism.

Overall, the Spring Awakening shocks the audience through its departure from common convention, harsh critique of society, and controversial subject matter. When I finished the play I was amazed at the topics the play provoked, some of which are controversial even today. Anti-homosexual sentiment is still prevalent in western society, abortion is still heavily argued, and rape is just as rejected as ever. While society informs its adolescents more of sex and puberty, the problems discussed by this play still exist and make the audience uncomfortable. One could only imagine how someone watching this play a hundred years ago would have felt.

To get a better understanding of the avant-garde movement, I recommend listening to Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring, as it is just as jarring and provocative musically as the Spring Awakening was in theatre:

« Older posts

© 2024 New York Scenes

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑